PDA

View Full Version : Better Tag Team # 1


Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:13 AM
Paul London & Brian Kendrick

<a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/paul london and brian kendrick/joshvdam/thBrianKendrickandPaulLondon.jpg?o=10" target="_blank"><img src="http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb40/joshvdam/thBrianKendrickandPaulLondon.jpg" border="0"></a>


vs.


Kofi Kingston & R-Truth

<a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/kofi kingston and r truth/Matheusthemasterofpower7/KofiKingstonR-Truth-2.jpg?o=2" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1250.photobucket.com/albums/hh534/Matheusthemasterofpower7/KofiKingstonR-Truth-2.jpg" border="0"></a>

SlickyTrickyDamon
09-15-2012, 07:52 AM
Londrick and it's not even close.

Nicky Fives
09-15-2012, 08:08 AM
not a huge fan of Kingston..... not even close for me.....

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:28 AM
Easy winner. I hate little jimmy.

Corporate CockSnogger
09-15-2012, 08:30 AM
I quite liked both London and Kendrick. I like R-Truth but not really into Kingston and haven't seen much of their run as a team so went with London and Kendrick.

Rammsteinmad
09-15-2012, 10:08 AM
London and Kendrick. They had a great run back in 2006 (I think that's when it was), but they also looked like a tag team, which R-Truth and Kingston, who I like, still reek of two singles guys thrown together.

WinterDecay
09-15-2012, 10:10 AM
The Hooligans all the way ...

Ultra Mantis
09-15-2012, 10:24 AM
Is this Juanctioned?

Graveler
09-15-2012, 10:33 AM
not even close

XCaliber
09-15-2012, 11:08 AM
Never liked the combo of R-Truth & Kofi so Londrick it is.

Anybody Thrilla
09-15-2012, 11:22 AM
I miss Air Boom.

Wolfpack423
09-15-2012, 11:34 AM
Yeah, I definitely think Paul London and Brian Kendrick were the better team. They had a great reign as WWE Tag Team Champions and they were a great high flying tandem. I also think the feud with MNM was one of the better tag team feuds. I think a match with Kofi Kingston and R-Truth would be a good match though.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 11:41 AM
This one's getting close.

Juan
09-15-2012, 12:14 PM
I thought you were just gonna pick up where I left off?

Emperor Smeat
09-15-2012, 02:13 PM
London and Kendrick

KaosDarksol
09-15-2012, 02:33 PM
London and Kendrick easily. Kofi and truth have overstayed their welcome as a team.

RiX1024
09-15-2012, 03:45 PM
Londrick Kendon gets my vote.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 04:29 PM
I thought you were just gonna pick up where I left off?

Nah, just figured I'd start all over.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 04:38 PM
Also a little surprise at the landslide victory, guess I underestimated Londrick's popularity.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 04:38 PM
Seriously thought Kingston and Truth would make it a little more competitive. They're becoming more of a "legit" tag team. I actually had to think about this for a second.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 04:47 PM
You aren't a legit tag team until you wear matching outfits.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 04:48 PM
Killer Bees, now THAT would give London/Kendrick some problems....B Brian Blair bitches...

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:05 PM
You aren't a legit tag team until you wear matching outfits.

The loophole to that rule is if you're both black.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:06 PM
Killer Bees, now THAT would give London/Kendrick some problems....B Brian Blair bitches...

Did someone say... A LOT OF WORDS THAT START WITH B???

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:17 PM
Did someone say... A LOT OF WORDS THAT START WITH B???

The guys name is B Brian Blair. I said a guys name, and then called a group of people bitches affectionately. I'm not sure what you're going for here sir.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:17 PM
The loophole to that rule is if you're both black.

This is not true

see: Harlem Heat, Doom.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:19 PM
This is not true

see: Harlem Heat, Doom.

Both legit tag teams. The matching tights were not necessary. On account of the blackness.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:22 PM
Please instruct me to said loophole. The fact that R-Truth and Kofi aren't considered a legit tag team is evidence enough that matching tights are required. Also, see Black Cena and Titus, a legit looking African American tag team, the Prime Time Playas.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:26 PM
R-truth and Kofi are certainly a legit tag team.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:27 PM
Jumpin' Jimmys

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:28 PM
False. They will go their separate ways as soon as they drop the tag belts to Daniel Bryan and Kane. Hell they don't even have a TEAM name. They are as legit as Kane and Rob Van Dam were.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:28 PM
Jumpin' Jimmys

Lol, fuck Little Jimmy

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:28 PM
Please instruct me to said loophole.

Section 12 article 7 in the legit tag team rulebook.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:31 PM
Hell they don't even have a TEAM name.

You mean like LONDON AND KENDRICK!?

Dun dun DUNNNNNN

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:32 PM
but they had MATCHING GEAR! You must have, one, the other, or BOTH! Color of skin is not considered the same gear, otherwise, all teams are legit.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:32 PM
Please instruct me to said loophole. The fact that R-Truth and Kofi aren't considered a legit tag team is evidence enough that matching tights are required.

http://www.freewebs.com/thexwf1/Outlaws.bmp

:wave:

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:34 PM
but they had MATCHING GEAR! You must have, one, the other, or BOTH! Color of skin is not considered the same gear, otherwise, all teams are legit.

Are you ignoring multicultural teams? That is quite racist.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:34 PM
http://www.freewebs.com/thexwf1/Outlaws.bmp

:wave:

Neon green and black. You're welcome :wave:

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:35 PM
Are you ignoring multicultural teams? That is quite racist.

Not if they're wearing the same gear and/or have a team name.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:36 PM
but they had MATCHING GEAR! You must have, one, the other, or BOTH!

http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/20800000/john-morrison-and-the-miz-john-morrison-20802025-500-312.jpg

:wave:

Corporate CockSnogger
09-15-2012, 05:37 PM
Billy Gunn transcends rules.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:39 PM
I'm unable to view that photo due to format I suppose. At work. What's it of so I may make up another reason as to why the two singles wrestlers aren't a team.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:39 PM
Billy Gunn transcends rules.

Iggy did it, nevermind.

Juan
09-15-2012, 05:40 PM
Nah, just figured I'd start all over.

Then why did you even bother to message me? lol

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:40 PM
Neon green and black. You're welcome :wave:

Oooh. Using the fact that I happened to pick one where Billy was wearing the green tights. Touche, sir...

http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/pictures/n/newageoutlaws/03.jpg

:wave:

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:41 PM
Matching t-shirts. Also had a name...the New Age Outlaws...one, the other, or both.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:41 PM
I'm unable to view that photo due to format I suppose. At work. What's it of so I may make up another reason as to why the two singles wrestlers aren't a team.

Miz and Morrison

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:42 PM
For example, I can consider Air Boom for reasons stated above.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:43 PM
Matching t-shirts. Also had a name...the New Age Outlaws...one, the other, or both.

So we're including shirts worn on the way to the ring as matching outfits huh? Alright...

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:43 PM
Miz and Morrison

I'll catch heat for this, but never really considered them much of a team either. That's not an excuse either. Just felt they threw Morrison with Miz after M & M.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:43 PM
So we're including shirts worn on the way to the ring as matching outfits huh? Alright...

No, they had a team name. The New Age Outlaws.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:44 PM
No, they had a team name. The New Age Outlaws.

Well, you argued the matching green so I was going with the "matching" thing.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:45 PM
I'll catch heat for this, but never really considered them much of a team either. That's not an excuse either. Just felt they threw Morrison with Miz after M & M.

:eek:

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:46 PM
So would you consider Jeri-Show more of a tag team than Miz and Morrison?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:47 PM
http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/16700000/Miz-Morrison-the-miz-michael-mizanin-16714493-330-339.jpgAlso....I counter your image, with an image.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:49 PM
I see complete darkness. I agree. Tag team.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:51 PM
It was an image of Miz and Morrsion in matching gear.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:52 PM
Did they wear matching gear at some point? But you just said you don't consider them a tag team...

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:53 PM
You know who else wore matching gear at some point...

http://www.wwe.com/f/wysiwyg/image/2012/08/SLAM12_PHOTO_1172.jpg

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:53 PM
I don't. They only did it once. Was just fucking around because it was the only one I could find at the moment.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:54 PM
But seriously. Would you consider Jeri-Show to be more of a tag team than Miz and Morrison and Truth and Kofi?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:54 PM
You know who else wore matching gear at some point...

http://www.wwe.com/f/wysiwyg/image/2012/08/SLAM12_PHOTO_1172.jpg

Those are two different blues.....Truth in denim blue, Kofi in more of a maya blue

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:55 PM
But seriously. Would you consider Jeri-Show to be more of a tag team than Miz and Morrison and Truth and Kofi?

No I considered Jerishow more of an angle as they were only actually a team for about 6 months and were only put together because Edge was injured.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 05:56 PM
But seriously. Would you consider Jeri-Show to be more of a tag team than Miz and Morrison and Truth and Kofi?

Though I will say I considered Miz and Morrison more of a team than Truth and Kofi.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:57 PM
But Jeri-Show had a team name...

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 05:59 PM
They even matched a lot. Covering both of your requirements for a legit tag team.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 06:02 PM
Are yo....ere? #1-w....can y...hear....m...

Connection bad.......I'll ca....ou..later.....

*Dialtone*

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 06:04 PM
:yes:

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 06:05 PM
In all seriousness, if you go by my rules of tag teams you WOULD have to consider JeriShow a tag team.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 06:07 PM
Same for the 2-man power trip, or whatever Austin and Trips were calling themselves, though again, that was more angle than long term tag teaming.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 06:08 PM
Two Dudes with Attitudes

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 06:09 PM
kinda groooooovyyy...(sorry california dreams popped in my head when I read that)

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 06:10 PM
I am of the belief you need a team name/matching attire, one or the other to be a certified legit tag team and not two singles guys tossed together for little reason.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 06:11 PM
Point is, it's a subjective "feel" thing as opposed to something you throw two rules on. You either feel like Kofi and Truth have established themselves as a legit team or you don't. I don't buy the idea that they can randomly come up with a name as a team and suddenly everything changes because of how they're announced.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 06:12 PM
I am of the belief you need a team name/matching attire, one or the other to be a certified legit tag team and not two singles guys tossed together for little reason.

How about Cactus Jack and Chainsaw Charlie?

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 06:13 PM
Their names go together perfectly. Charlie was even named with the intention of teaming with Cactus. No team name though, no matching attire and they weren't exactly thrown together for no reason.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 06:19 PM
Then why did you even bother to message me? lol

I probably would've just started where you left off if you would've replied back. Alas you did not and therefore I made the decision to start off fresh.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 06:54 PM
How about Cactus Jack and Chainsaw Charlie?

Nope, didn't see it as a tag team.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:01 PM
Point is, it's a subjective "feel" thing as opposed to something you throw two rules on. You either feel like Kofi and Truth have established themselves as a legit team or you don't. I don't buy the idea that they can randomly come up with a name as a team and suddenly everything changes because of how they're announced.

Yeah I get your point, and can understand if you feel that way, but I grew up during the era where tag teams HAD at least one of those 2 rules when teams were formed. There's been such a watering down of what makes a "team" that it's jaded me in terms of what defines a team to me. There are exceptions to the rule, but in general I consider a tag team more often than not should possess one of those 2 specs.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:05 PM
I think we grew up watching the same era. And tag teams didn't always have at least one of those 2 rules. There may have been more tag teams that did but there were also still a lot who didn't.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:07 PM
Remember Owen Hart and Yokozuna? So fucking random. lol

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:16 PM
lol, they were random, and I fucking hated that. That was around the time they began getting away from the "team" concept. You had Smoking Gunns, New Rockers, New Blackjacks, etc and then fucking Yoko and Owen.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:18 PM
There are exceptions to the rule, but in general I consider a tag team more often than not should possess one of those 2 specs.
:wave:

They even made Greg Valentine dye his hair black and dress like a fucktard to team with HTM.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:19 PM
Yoko and Owen were random, but they were 2 time tag champs and defended their titles against multiple teams. Even though they were random do you consider them a tag team ?

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:19 PM
Even before that though, you also had former tag team champions Sparky Plugg and The 1-2-3 Kid.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:20 PM
Same era, mid 90's. 95/96. I zoned out during that era because it was atrocious lol. I was referring more to the 80's WWF.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:21 PM
How do you feel it effects the "legit tag team" label if the two guys have a common manager?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:21 PM
Even before that though, you also had former tag team champions Sparky Plugg and The 1-2-3 Kid.

Though for the record, I didn't consider them a team either and forgot they even held the belts.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:23 PM
How do you feel it effects the "legit tag team" label if the two guys have a common manager?

If they are part of a stable I don't usually consider them an official tag team. Who were you thinking of....million dollar corporation?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:23 PM
I'm enjoying this dialogue by the way.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:26 PM
If they are part of a stable I don't usually consider them an official tag team. Who were you thinking of....million dollar corporation?

Now if they were teaming PRIOR to joining the stable, could be a different story:D

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:30 PM
If they are part of a stable I don't usually consider them an official tag team. Who were you thinking of....million dollar corporation?

Or The Heenan Family

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:31 PM
Now if they were teaming PRIOR to joining the stable, could be a different story:D

Would you consider Owen and The Bulldog more of a tag team than Owen and Yokozuna?

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:32 PM
So would you consider The Colossal Connection ( Haku and Andre) a team then ?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:33 PM
Yes, see: official Tag Team name.

To elaborate: They were originally just members of the Heenan family, however, they formed a team and had a team name, hence, they became a tag team. Eventually Heenan would abandon Andre and Andre turned, ending the team.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:34 PM
Yes, see: official Tag Team name.

But you wouldn't consider Owen and Yoko a team ?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:35 PM
No. They did not have a team name. They were just Yoko and Owen who were teaming because Cornette managed them both.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:36 PM
The missing element? Team name.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:37 PM
They could have gone with Camp Cornette which was the stable name, but that would have to involve there not being a stable and Vader and Bulldog having to "kick rocks".

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:40 PM
Would you consider Owen and The Bulldog more of a tag team than Owen and Yokozuna?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:40 PM
Another example similar would be the Twin Towers, who consisted technically of a fat white "african" and an evil cop. They had that name and therefore were a team.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:40 PM
The missing element? Team name.

But then that would exclude a team like Doug Furnas and Phil Lafon or if I wanted to include an older team like Ricky Steamboat and jay Youngblood, who were 5 time champions

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:42 PM
But then that would exclude a team like Doug Furnas and Phil Lafon or if I wanted to include an older team like Ricky Steamboat and jay Youngblood, who were 5 time champions

No, furnas and lafon had matching tights. *See: Matching ring gear*

As far as Steamboat and Youngblood, I didn't watch that era so I can't recall if their shit matched or not.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:42 PM
Or even Steve Williams and Terry Gordy, although i guess they technically dressed the same.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:42 PM
Bulldog and Owen were the same as Yoko and Owen. Stable mates that teamed up.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:43 PM
Another example similar would be the Twin Towers, who consisted technically of a fat white "african" and an evil cop. They had that name and therefore were a team.

I'm not seeing the difference between this and JeriShow...

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:45 PM
No, furnas and lafon had matching tights. *See: Matching ring gear*

As far as Steamboat and Youngblood, I didn't watch that era so I can't recall if their shit matched or not.

Yeah, I figured most people on here didn't watch much before late 80's so I was only gonna include teams from that era and beyond.

Corporate CockSnogger
09-15-2012, 07:46 PM
Kane and X-Pac had no common links but I loved the fuck out of them together.

Corporate CockSnogger
09-15-2012, 07:47 PM
I guess Kane didn't really have a common link with any of his partners outside of Taker really. But I enjoyed him and X-Pac the most. They were a legit team in my eyes.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:48 PM
Kane and X-Pac had no common links but I loved the fuck out of them together.

That brings up a good question. Who was more of a team, Kane and X-Pac or Kane and RVD ?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:49 PM
In all seriousness, if you go by my rules of tag teams you WOULD have to consider JeriShow a tag team.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:50 PM
That brings up a good question. Who was more of a team, Kane and X-Pac or Kane and RVD ?

They were the same. They were both put together for storyline purposes with no real plan to keep them together as a long-term team. As Iggy mentioned, the Kane/X-Pac was the better story IMO.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:51 PM
I just realized Edge and Christian by itsmeJD's guidelines are not a legit tag team.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:53 PM
It's weird though. You made the rules of how you consider a team a legit team. Then you broke them because you don't consider JeriShow a team but you admit that your rules do actually make JeriShow a tag team despite not considering them a tag team. lol

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 07:53 PM
They were the same. They were both put together for storyline purposes with no real plan to keep them together as a long-term team. As Iggy mentioned, the Kane/X-Pac was the better story IMO.

I agree. Teams that were solely brought together for storyline purposes won't be included. Even though some of them have team names, like Jerishow, Rated RKO, Two Man Power Trip, Dudes with Attitude and so on.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:55 PM
Road Warrior gets it.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 07:57 PM
I just realized Edge and Christian by itsmeJD's guidelines are not a legit tag team.

This would definitely be an exception that doesn't abide by my rules. They were stablemates who teamed. At the start of the career they did have the trenchcoats and similar tight styles, but as they moved on the styles changed. The eventually looked nothing alike gear wise. Their wiki technically refers to them as E&C but even I don't recall that EVER being their team name.

WWF Fan may have found a loophole in my logic, because I definitely consider them a tag team.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 07:58 PM
I GET it.

Still... You've said you don't consider JeriShow a tag team but you also admitted that by your rules, they are a tag team. They're YOUR rules. Why make them to admittedly break them? lol

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:01 PM
If you only apply the two rules listed earlier they are a tag team. I do not take into account however, tag teams that were created for the purpose of an angle.

Also:
Win if you can, lose if you must, but ALWAYS cheat.
Rules were made to be broken.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:01 PM
WWF Fan may have found a loophole in my logic, because I definitely consider them a tag team.

Eeexcellent. *Rubs hands together.*

But really, that's what I meant earlier by "rules" being kinda silly since it really just comes down to a feeling. I don't know exactly why Edge and Christian are a legit tag team. I could dissect it but it surely wouldn't come down to something so simple as fitting under two or three guidelines.

Corporate CockSnogger
09-15-2012, 08:02 PM
I think all these thrown together teams should still be put up in the polls. Obviously minor alliances and such shouldn't really be considered, but if they were considered a tag team by WWE (edit:and all organisations as well for that matter), regardless of how we view them, they should be used.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:03 PM
I also definitely consider Owen and The Bulldog to have been more of a legit team than Owen and Yokozuna.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:04 PM
I think all these thrown together teams should still be put up in the polls. Obviously minor alliances and such shouldn't really be considered, but if they were considered a tag team by WWE, regardless of how we view them, they should be used.

I agree. For purposes of the poll, let anyone who teamed together on a remotely regular basis in.

Juan
09-15-2012, 08:04 PM
Is this Juanctioned?

No.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:04 PM
Ehh I guess I have to agree to an extent. I do believe the guidelines for the most part hold true, but more to older generations. Tag team wrestling is a farce nowadays.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:04 PM
I think all these thrown together teams should still be put up in the polls. Obviously minor alliances and such shouldn't really be considered, but if they were considered a tag team by WWE (edit:and all organisations as well for that matter), regardless of how we view them, they should be used.

They can, but they will be slaughtered.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 08:05 PM
Eeexcellent. *Rubs hands together.*

But really, that's what I meant earlier by "rules" being kinda silly since it really just comes down to a feeling. I don't know exactly why Edge and Christian are a legit tag team. I could dissect it but it surely wouldn't come down to something so simple as fitting under two or three guidelines.

They're probably considered legit because of the length of time they teamed together and that they were multiple time tag champs.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:06 PM
They're probably considered legit because of the length of time they teamed together and that they were multiple time tag champs.

Or they were basically together as a team for a large portion of their careers....in comparison to other make shift, no name teams.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:06 PM
Longevity I've also underestimated in what I determine to be a tag team.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 08:06 PM
Or they were basically together as a team for a large portion of their careers....in comparison to other make shift, no name teams.

:y:

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:10 PM
They're probably considered legit because of the length of time they teamed together and that they were multiple time tag champs.

I considered them a tag team heading into WrestleMania 2000 and they'd only been teaming together for just over a year.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 08:11 PM
I considered them a tag team heading into WrestleMania 2000 and they'd only been teaming together for just over a year.

Yeah but they weren't established singles stars before then, as with all the other teams mentioned.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:12 PM
They can, but they will be slaughtered.

I bet The Rock 'n' Sock Connection could make some noise.

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:12 PM
Yup

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:13 PM
I bet The Rock 'n' Sock Connection could make some noise.

Only because of the Rock sheep that feel he's the second coming of Christ.

Corporate CockSnogger
09-15-2012, 08:20 PM
Rated RKO, Head Cheese, Two Man Power Trip, Mega Powers, Brothers of Destruction are just a small sample of "two guys thrown together" teams that will likely get a bunch of votes.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:20 PM
Yeah but they weren't established singles stars before then, as with all the other teams mentioned.

How about Jericho and Benoit?

itsmeJD
09-15-2012, 08:21 PM
Well for the record the original comment was in jest...shoulda thrown some shifty-eyes on there. I don't always agree with the TP-Dub votes.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:21 PM
Rated RKO, Head Cheese, Two Man Power Trip, Mega Powers, Brothers of Destruction are just a small sample of "two guys thrown together" teams that will likely get a bunch of votes.

How about Jericho and Benoit?

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 08:25 PM
How about Jericho and Benoit?

I feel like Benoit and Jericho were both already established stars. Benoit had already been WCW World Champion and Jericho was already over as a singles star, the team also had no longevity.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:29 PM
I feel like Benoit and Jericho were both already established stars.

Well, obviously. They had a pretty memorable little run though. And they'd definitely get some votes.

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 08:34 PM
Well, obviously. They had a pretty memorable little run though. And they'd definitely get some votes.

I agree, but again I feel they were solely brought together to challenge the TMPT. There was really no plan to develop them as a team, therefore they probably won't be included.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:36 PM
Are you including Kane and X-Pac and Kane and RVD?

Road Warrior
09-15-2012, 08:39 PM
Are you including Kane and X-Pac and Kane and RVD?

? Haven't made that decision yet. If I did include one of the two it would be Kane and X-Pac. There's a lot of teams I'll have to make that decision on, especially in WCW.

#1-norm-fan
09-15-2012, 08:46 PM
I would like to request Ricky Steamboat and Shane Douglas' presence in this. They will likely get destroyed but they were awesome.

KIRA
09-15-2012, 09:41 PM
I was a fan of Kingston but after his main event push died my enthusiasm slowly dwindled (I still have foolish hope) but any way Londrick wins for me Kofi and R-truth just come across as two totally separate personalities neither complements the other and being black guys is the only thing they have in common.

WinterDecay
09-16-2012, 01:59 AM
I would just like to point out the the Mounties and Strike Force both had matching gear and a team name .... and both sucked.

So it would seem by contrapositive logic, that one does not need matching gear or a team name in order to be an entertaining tag team.

With that said, creative could at least start doing their jobs and try to come up with team names for these guys.

I recall from London and Kendrick's shoot that they wanted the team name to be the Hooligans. But this was after they started smoking ... so who knows.

#1-norm-fan
09-16-2012, 02:53 AM
Londrick would have been just fine.

#1-norm-fan
09-16-2012, 02:54 AM
With that said, creative could at least start doing their jobs...

I've come to find that this is just too much to ask.

Road Warrior
09-16-2012, 03:32 AM
I would just like to point out the the Mounties and Strike Force both had matching gear and a team name .... and both sucked.

So it would seem by contrapositive logic, that one does not need matching gear or a team name in order to be an entertaining tag team.

With that said, creative could at least start doing their jobs and try to come up with team names for these guys.

I recall from London and Kendrick's shoot that they wanted the team name to be the Hooligans. But this was after they started smoking ... so who knows.

Who are The Mounties ?

Juan
09-16-2012, 04:10 AM
I probably would've just started where you left off if you would've replied back. Alas you did not and therefore I made the decision to start off fresh.

Please start BTT from where it left off.

Mercenary
09-16-2012, 04:21 AM
Who are The Mounties ?

....

http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/slides/photos/001/907/704/Quebecers_display_image.jpg?1329007280


The Quebecers were a heel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heel_%28professional_wrestling%29) professional wrestling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_wrestling) tag team (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_team) in the World Wrestling Federation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wrestling_Entertainment) from 1993 to 1994 and again in 1998 that consisted of Jacques Rougeau (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Rougeau) and Pierre (Carl Ouellet) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Ouellet). They also worked as the Amazing French Canadians in World Championship Wrestling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Championship_Wrestling) from 1996 to 1997.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9CY2XtuxoEI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

#1-norm-fan
09-16-2012, 04:34 AM
I think what he's trying to say is "The Mounties" is what he called "The Quebecers".

Road Warrior
09-16-2012, 05:12 AM
I know who the Quebecers are, I've just never heard them called The Mounties.

Road Warrior
09-16-2012, 05:17 AM
Please start BTT from where it left off.

Nope, like I said, maybe if you would of replied we could of come to some kind of agreement and discussed what BTT was going to be, but as it is, it's mine now. Besides you seem to have your hands full with match of the week.

Road Warrior
09-16-2012, 05:36 AM
Please start BTT from where it left off.

<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DLPri3n8E2s?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DLPri3n8E2s?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

Bocephus Black
09-16-2012, 09:40 AM
Bocephus Black be backin tha Bolsheviks baby. They da best!

The Condor
09-16-2012, 10:31 AM
Ken Shamrock and Big Bossman were part of a stable and held the titles for a few months, does that qualify?

Double D
09-16-2012, 11:07 AM
Disco Inferno and Alex Wright for the win here. Or how about Norton and Steiner, they were kind of an NWO tag team, right? I also hate the thrown together tag teams, and especially the "Token Black Guy Team vs. Token Latino Guy Team for the titles!"...voted for London and Kendrick, they had a sweet valet/manager in Ashley Massaro too if I remember correctly. Always liked "The" Brian Kendrick, appreciated his cocky-rockstar-esque strut and whatnot. On a side note, anyone else think he looks strikingly like Kurt Cobain?

Double D
09-16-2012, 11:09 AM
Who are the two who voted Kingston and Truth? Would enjoy hearing their argument, from a curiosity standpoint I suppose.

XCaliber
09-16-2012, 12:17 PM
The Quebecers > R-Truth and Kofi based solely on their entrance theme alone heh.

LewisTheTruest
09-16-2012, 02:08 PM
Londrick. Don't see any recent teams making the cut due to current state of the divison. This comp'll be interesting

Destor
09-16-2012, 04:03 PM
lol...the "define wrestler" argument is now "define tag team." let me make it simple: if they ever tagged together theyre a tag team. doesnt mean they were a good one.

#1-norm-fan
09-16-2012, 11:55 PM
lol...the "define wrestler" argument is now "define tag team." let me make it simple: if they ever tagged together theyre a tag team.

If I don't see Sheamus and "Mean" Gene Okerlund in this thing, I'll be pissed.

Supreme Olajuwon
09-17-2012, 12:22 AM
Even if this Better Tag Team is not Juan approved, I think you should still incorporate the previous Better Tag Team history into it.

Juan
09-17-2012, 12:27 AM
Nope, like I said, maybe if you would of replied we could of come to some kind of agreement and discussed what BTT was going to be, but as it is, it's mine now. Besides you seem to have your hands full with match of the week.

Don't be a dick.

#1-norm-fan
09-17-2012, 12:42 AM
it's mine now.

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/images/300x/4253518.jpg

Supreme Olajuwon
09-17-2012, 01:29 AM
I thought this was supposed to wait until Best Wrestler was finished anyway. What's the rush?

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 01:43 AM
No rush really, just had the idea for a while and there didn't seem to be a lot going on in the forums lately, that's all.

Juan
09-17-2012, 01:43 AM
I thought this was supposed to wait until Best Wrestler was finished anyway. What's the rush?

Exactly.

Juan
09-17-2012, 01:45 AM
No rush really, just had the idea for a while and there didn't seem to be a lot going on in the forums lately, that's all.

Even if this Better Tag Team is not Juan approved, I think you should still incorporate the previous Better Tag Team history into it.

Please start BTT from where it left off.

Supreme Olajuwon
09-17-2012, 01:48 AM
I mean why give Juan a deadline at all if there's no rush? And why when he did respond are you now like "sorry dude it's mine now ahahahahahahaha"

seems kinda dickish to me

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 01:56 AM
Really ? Do you think by starting back up now it's somehow infringing on Best Wrestler ? Not really sure what the problem is, as the only one's who seem to be complaining about it are you and Juan. As far as the it's mine now comment, it was made as joke because I really don't take this stuff that seriously.

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:01 AM
I really don't take this stuff that seriously.

Then why not start it from where it left off?

You saying "no, you didn't reply in time" kinda pokes holes in your "I don't take this stuff seriously" story.

Supreme Olajuwon
09-17-2012, 02:01 AM
I don't give a shit what you do. I'm just asking a question based on previous conversations had about starting this up again. And because it looked like you were being a dick to Juan for no real reason, I decided to speak up. Since Juan expressed interest in doing this again, wouldn't it make sense for you guys to work together?

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:05 AM
Since Juan expressed interest in doing this again, wouldn't it make sense for you guys to work together?

Yes, of course, but I didn't respond in the allotted time, you see.

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 02:07 AM
Then why not start it from where it left off?

You saying "no, you didn't reply in time" kinda pokes holes in your "I don't take this stuff seriously" story.

What difference does it make ? And you can tell I how seriously I take it by the fact that I've been a member of the forums for going on 6 years and have under 400 posts.

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:10 AM
What difference does it make ?

I dunno, I'd like to think that the "work" thedamndest and I put into these things wasn't completely for nothing.

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 02:11 AM
I don't give a shit what you do. I'm just asking a question based on previous conversations had about starting this up again. And because it looked like you were being a dick to Juan for no real reason, I decided to speak up. Since Juan expressed interest in doing this again, wouldn't it make sense for you guys to work together?

It would make sense to work together if someone like creating a poll every 3 days was a two man job, but it's really not. How much input do you think is needed in deciding something that doesn't take a lot of thought process.

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:11 AM
It's a simple request. I don't see what the big deal is. You can keep doing them yourself

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:13 AM
Basically, it's like I said... don't be a dick.

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 02:13 AM
I dunno, I'd like to think that the "work" thedamndest and I put into these things wasn't completely for nothing.

Fair enough, if it's really a big deal then okay I'll go back and start it over from where you left off.

Supreme Olajuwon
09-17-2012, 02:17 AM
It would make sense to work together if someone like creating a poll every 3 days was a two man job, but it's really not. How much input do you think is needed in deciding something that doesn't take a lot of thought process.

Because it's not about the workload, it's about sharing and not being a dick.

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:22 AM
I think the last Better Tag Team left off on #89 and had the Hardy's going into #90 in the Hall of Fame round.

Supreme Olajuwon
09-17-2012, 02:23 AM
I think we should all discuss this over a nice mango berry smoothie.

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 02:25 AM
I think the last Better Tag Team left off on #89 and had the Hardy's going into #90 in the Hall of Fame round.

Okay I'll check it out. I f you would like to work together on this thing then that's okay, your input would be welcomed. I'll even apologize for the it's mine now comment, it was meant as a joke.

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:26 AM
I think we should all discuss this over a nice mango berry smoothie.

I can break in my new CM Punk flask

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:27 AM
Okay I'll check it out. I f you would like to work together on this thing then that's okay, your input would be welcomed. I'll even apologize for the it's mine now comment, it was meant as a joke.

No worries man.

I'll be here if you need input, but this baby is yours now.

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 02:27 AM
I think we should all discuss this over a nice mango berry smoothie.

:yes:

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 02:29 AM
No worries man.

I'll be here if you need input, but this baby is yours now.

You sure ? Like I said, didn't mean to be a dick and I'm always open to hearing someone else's opinion.

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:31 AM
Yeah I'm sure. We can work together if you ever need some help picking a good opponent or if you need me to post one if you're not around or something, but like I said, it's all you now.

Supreme Olajuwon
09-17-2012, 02:34 AM
Woo progress!

Road Warrior
09-17-2012, 02:36 AM
Actually now that I think of it, here's a question already. I can't remember but how long do you keep a team out of rotation once they lose a round ?

Juan
09-17-2012, 02:47 AM
It's 50 rounds if I remember correctly, same as Better Wrestler.

CSL
09-17-2012, 05:54 AM
pussies, I wanted to see a war, maybe Better Tag Team and Better Tag Team: Wolfpac running concurrently or something

Ruien
09-17-2012, 08:43 AM
You guys need to give Road Warrior a break. Dude is making a poll that has not been done in like a year. Let him do his own thing.

CSL
09-17-2012, 09:16 AM
you say after it's all been quite amicably settled

Pintint
09-17-2012, 12:42 PM
Kofi/Truth because of Lil'Jimmy.

itsmeJD
09-17-2012, 01:24 PM
Kofi/Truth because of Lil'Jimmy.

I officially hate you.

#1-norm-fan
09-17-2012, 03:22 PM
I officially hate you.

You hate an invisible boy.

(Lil' Jimmy, not Pintint.)

Destor
09-17-2012, 07:54 PM
If I don't see Sheamus and "Mean" Gene Okerlund in this thing, I'll be pissed.

shitty random tag teams are still tag teams.

Destor
09-17-2012, 07:55 PM
also i think this who owns BTTT debate is really funny. dont see me undercutting supreme...

CSL
09-17-2012, 10:16 PM
going to turn heel and post the final the second the semi finishes whilst wearing all black

Destor
09-17-2012, 11:44 PM
LOL