Why isnt Heyman on RAW???

[Joe Kerr]

:rant: This pisses me off if your not going to abide by the rules then dont make the damn story line. If they were going to keep Paul on Smackdown then they shouldve excluded him from the draft. This pisses the RAD-man off beyond beleif!!! :mad:

[MVP]

WWE is notorious for ignoring all logic, do I need to give examples?

Anyway I think Paul Heyman is fine on Smackdown because he's one of the most renowned figures on the roster, and Smackdown needs guys like him on the roster to maintain a lot of the show's dignity since WWE continues to keep the crusierweights on Velocity.

[Fryza]

The storyline to my knowledge was he quit after being drafted, and then was re-hired by Angle is be a substitute while he was away. Since Angle re-hired him, he'd then be on SmackDown anyway.

[Boondock Saint]

Yeah, Fryza has it. Althugh I thought that was for "one night only" so I don't know what his "on-air" position is supposed to be now.

But even if he wasn't "re-hired" by Angle, he did quit when he was drafted to RAW so by coming back, that wouldn't mean he is forced to return to RAW. It's not as if he was drafted to RAW, then got injured or whatever, then randomly showed up on Smackdown.

[Boondock Saint]

Buuuuut, if anyone can just "quit", I suppose that raises the question of why, if Booker T hates being on SD, he doesn't quit and go to RAW?

WWE logic hurts my head.

[Joe Kerr]

LOL true



but if you remember Heyman after he was GM for a day was a paying fan who was escorted by security when he Grabbed Mysterios leg two weeks ago.

[Shaggy]

I totally forgot that he was drafted to Raw. Untill you said that I didnt even think about it. I guess they should of followed through and brought him over to Raw. Or atleast said something like they were able to get something good if they traded him back.

[Longshot]

Heyman is one of the few characters that is actually making smackdown watchable so why would they move him to RAW?

If you move people like Heyman, Undertaker, RVD, and Cena to RAW you might as well cancel smackdown. :wavesad:

[Joe Kerr]

Heyman is one of the few characters that is actually making smackdown watchable so why would they move him to RAW?

If you move people like Heyman, Undertaker, RVD, and Cena to RAW you might as well cancel smackdown. :wavesad:


The complaint I was making is they went through the draft to switch up the rosters. If they had no intentions of moving Heyman then they shouldve left him out of the story line. Maybe give RAW someone else that isnt really being used maybe give RAW Funaki or Paul London.

[Longshot]

The draft was months ago get over it.

I'm not sure what Paul London would do on RAW...he's not even making it onto TV on the "B" show, so why would he get on TV for RAW?

As for Funaki, you cant take Smackdown! number 1 annoucer away. :(

[darkpower]

To try to make sense of WWE's logic:

They did that to get Heyman out of the GM storyline because they wanted to give Angle a non-wrestling role because of Angle's injuries.

From what I understand, they had it so Booker T didn't like going to SD, but Angle tried to make things worthwhile for him by being on his side.

Heyman got drafted to RAW, then quit soon afterwards (about a MINUTE after). Then Angle did choose Heyman as a sub GM because of his scripted injury from Big Show. Then he came back as a "VIP,", then as a fan who bought a ticket, and now someone that the Dudley's have as their "agent", so to speak. He's had different ways of being a part of the show each week.