BCWWF
10-03-2006, 09:24 PM
I just posted this in the other thread, but this is a bigger topic than that. I was told of this playoff format last year by a friend of mine, and in my opinion it is the best possible format. It includes all of the Div. 1A conference champions as well as the five next best teams.
Format:
16 teams - four weeks long, still ending in beginning of January.
9 D-1A conference champions recieve automatic bids: ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Big East, Pac-10, SEC, as well as C-USA, MAC, Mountain West, Sun Belt and WAC.
5 teams recieve automatic bids
All rankings done based on the AP Poll (or some other legit one)
So, based on the current AP rankings and some assumed conference champions, this is what the tournament would look like right now.
First Round:
1. Ohio State (Big Ten champ)
16. Middle Tennessee (Sun Belt champ)
8. Louisville (at large 3)
9. LSU (at large 4)
4. West Virginia (Big East champ)
13. Utah (Mountain West champ)
5. Florida (at large 1)
12. Boise State (WAC champ)
3. USC (Pac-10 champ)
14. Houston (C-USA champ)
6. Michigan (at large 2)
11. Clemson (ACC champ)
7. Texas (Big 12 champ)
10. Georgia (at large 5)
2. Auburn (SEC Champ)
15. Kent State (MAC champ)
*Some conference champions are assumed, and might be very off, especially in the small conferences. Seeding is done by rankings.
ROUND 2
1. Ohio State
9. LSU
4. West Virginia
5. Florida
3. USC
6. Michigan
7. Texas
2. Auburn
Round 3
Orange Bowl
1. Ohio State
5. Florida
Sugar Bowl
3. USC
2. Auburn
Finals
Rose Bowl (National Championship)
1. Ohio State
3. USC
Fiesta Bowl (consolation third place game)
5. Florida
2. Auburn
Champions:
1. Ohio State
2. USC
3. Auburn
4. Florida
Then, to please the other people, some real emphasis can be placed on the top tier bowl games.
Capitol One Bowl: Notre Dame (replacing SEC) vs. Iowa
Cotton Bowl: Oklahoma vs. Tennessee
Peach Bowl: Florida State vs. Oregon (replacing SEC)
Gator Bowl: Georgia Tech vs. Rutgers
--------------------
Reasons why I think it works:
1. Based on the AP Poll, the No. 1 thru No. 10 teams are all included. No. 16, No. 20 would also be in based on winning their conference.
2. As of right now, there is nothing to play for in the five non-BCS conferences. Even if they go undefeated, they are unlikely to play in the best BCS bowl. Not only would this method help build up the smaller programs, but it would also give a team like Boise State or Utah a legitimate chance for the national title.
3. There would be some blowouts, specifically No. 1-16, 2-15, 3-14 and 4-13, but I think that is the price you pay. If you switched to eight games with only the BCS conference champions, you would be leaving out Louisville to get the ACC champion in there. If you went to 16 teams but left out the smaller conference champions, it would defeat the purpose. You still have teams with no chance of making the national title game while you are continuing to preach that the only reason you have the five non-BCS conferences is to collect paychecks for losing.
4. If Texas can play Houston and count it as a Div. 1A win, why should Houston's conference be completely disregarded after week 4?
Reasons for controversy:
1. Notre Dame would not be in it under this setup. If there was some bullshit Independent team clause, that would mean No. 12 Notre Dame would be in and No. 10 Georgia out. That is not fair to me, and because Notre Dame has just as much opportunity to be an at-large bid as anybody else, they should have to earn it. If Notre Dame plays a season good enough to win a conference, they will be top 10 already.
2. No. 11 Oregon would want in. Well too bad, finishing second in the Pac-10 doesn't help you here.
3. Obviously Middle Tennessee isn't on the same caliber as Ohio State, but to make it fair and give them an opportunity means more to me than seeing Oklahoma losing to Ohio State. I would rather see Oklahoma playing Tennessee in a better game TBH.
I am getting lazy of explaining things, but just what is your input on this format?
Format:
16 teams - four weeks long, still ending in beginning of January.
9 D-1A conference champions recieve automatic bids: ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Big East, Pac-10, SEC, as well as C-USA, MAC, Mountain West, Sun Belt and WAC.
5 teams recieve automatic bids
All rankings done based on the AP Poll (or some other legit one)
So, based on the current AP rankings and some assumed conference champions, this is what the tournament would look like right now.
First Round:
1. Ohio State (Big Ten champ)
16. Middle Tennessee (Sun Belt champ)
8. Louisville (at large 3)
9. LSU (at large 4)
4. West Virginia (Big East champ)
13. Utah (Mountain West champ)
5. Florida (at large 1)
12. Boise State (WAC champ)
3. USC (Pac-10 champ)
14. Houston (C-USA champ)
6. Michigan (at large 2)
11. Clemson (ACC champ)
7. Texas (Big 12 champ)
10. Georgia (at large 5)
2. Auburn (SEC Champ)
15. Kent State (MAC champ)
*Some conference champions are assumed, and might be very off, especially in the small conferences. Seeding is done by rankings.
ROUND 2
1. Ohio State
9. LSU
4. West Virginia
5. Florida
3. USC
6. Michigan
7. Texas
2. Auburn
Round 3
Orange Bowl
1. Ohio State
5. Florida
Sugar Bowl
3. USC
2. Auburn
Finals
Rose Bowl (National Championship)
1. Ohio State
3. USC
Fiesta Bowl (consolation third place game)
5. Florida
2. Auburn
Champions:
1. Ohio State
2. USC
3. Auburn
4. Florida
Then, to please the other people, some real emphasis can be placed on the top tier bowl games.
Capitol One Bowl: Notre Dame (replacing SEC) vs. Iowa
Cotton Bowl: Oklahoma vs. Tennessee
Peach Bowl: Florida State vs. Oregon (replacing SEC)
Gator Bowl: Georgia Tech vs. Rutgers
--------------------
Reasons why I think it works:
1. Based on the AP Poll, the No. 1 thru No. 10 teams are all included. No. 16, No. 20 would also be in based on winning their conference.
2. As of right now, there is nothing to play for in the five non-BCS conferences. Even if they go undefeated, they are unlikely to play in the best BCS bowl. Not only would this method help build up the smaller programs, but it would also give a team like Boise State or Utah a legitimate chance for the national title.
3. There would be some blowouts, specifically No. 1-16, 2-15, 3-14 and 4-13, but I think that is the price you pay. If you switched to eight games with only the BCS conference champions, you would be leaving out Louisville to get the ACC champion in there. If you went to 16 teams but left out the smaller conference champions, it would defeat the purpose. You still have teams with no chance of making the national title game while you are continuing to preach that the only reason you have the five non-BCS conferences is to collect paychecks for losing.
4. If Texas can play Houston and count it as a Div. 1A win, why should Houston's conference be completely disregarded after week 4?
Reasons for controversy:
1. Notre Dame would not be in it under this setup. If there was some bullshit Independent team clause, that would mean No. 12 Notre Dame would be in and No. 10 Georgia out. That is not fair to me, and because Notre Dame has just as much opportunity to be an at-large bid as anybody else, they should have to earn it. If Notre Dame plays a season good enough to win a conference, they will be top 10 already.
2. No. 11 Oregon would want in. Well too bad, finishing second in the Pac-10 doesn't help you here.
3. Obviously Middle Tennessee isn't on the same caliber as Ohio State, but to make it fair and give them an opportunity means more to me than seeing Oklahoma losing to Ohio State. I would rather see Oklahoma playing Tennessee in a better game TBH.
I am getting lazy of explaining things, but just what is your input on this format?