PDA

View Full Version : The Blooperint


Afterlife
07-31-2008, 02:04 PM
So, while I was in Dayton, I managed to catch an AM edition of TNA because everyone else was asleep. Anyway, I saw "The Blueprint" Matt Morgan, and noticed he's still using that horribly awkward finisher. He did it to 2 different guys, and it looked just as shitty and useless as it did during his ruh-ruh-run in Dubba-dubba-WWE.

I guess I'm just making hurtful commentary on a stupid move. Discuss.

screech
07-31-2008, 03:12 PM
I don't mind the finisher, I can't stand the name though (Hellivator or however the hell it's spelled). I was always a fan, so I'm just glad Morgan is actually being used now compared to his WWE run.

If he doesn't stick with the current move, I could see him doing a chokeslam, or taking Tomko's finisher now that he's done with TNA. Or he could always try doing the F-5 again, seeing as that worked out so well for him.

What would you suggest in its place, Afterlife?

Afterlife
07-31-2008, 06:07 PM
Anything believable.

Destor
07-31-2008, 06:13 PM
The move is terrible, yeah. It has no impact at all. Hate it.

Afterlife
07-31-2008, 06:38 PM
It just looks like the recipiant is doing all the work.

Lux
07-31-2008, 07:22 PM
Anyone who's finisher is named the Hellivator needs to hit the drawing board again

Afterlife
07-31-2008, 07:29 PM
lol, I actually like that name. But, I like wordplay. I wanted to call Morrison's finisher "The Door Jam".

Lux
07-31-2008, 07:33 PM
Moonlight Drive is the best thing i'ev heard and seen on TV, Hellivator is horrible, what does it have to do with him at all?

Lux
07-31-2008, 07:33 PM
It'd be a far and i mean far stretch to say it could be linked to him being the "blueprint" which he shouldn't be

Xero
07-31-2008, 07:41 PM
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pkZCsXE90Oo&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pkZCsXE90Oo&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Assuming it's that, I like the concept of the move but I think it would look more effective if instead of going into the Rock Bottom it goes into a spear.

Destor
07-31-2008, 07:55 PM
Absolutly no impact.

Afterlife
07-31-2008, 08:41 PM
Yes, that's the move. THe move that requires the recipiant to do all the work.

Shadow
08-01-2008, 01:43 AM
Like a Canadian Destoryer?

Dave Youell
08-01-2008, 05:45 AM
It would have more impact if he held a leg, like a fishermans plex, then did it. Meaning that the other guy wouldn’t look like he almost landing on his feet when he takes it.

screech
08-01-2008, 01:26 PM
The one he did on Tomko was awful. It looked better when he did it to that other guy, but not much.

Destor
08-01-2008, 01:27 PM
I disagree, there was actual impact on the Tomko one.

screech
08-01-2008, 01:44 PM
Yes, but it still looked like shit.

owenbrown
08-01-2008, 02:59 PM
Anyone who's finisher is named the Hellivator needs to hit the drawing board again


This is TNA we're speaking of, remember? They don't need a drawing board, they need someone to take their crayons away.

thedamndest
08-01-2008, 03:46 PM
Morgan "The Organ" would be a way cooler name.

Afterlife
08-01-2008, 03:57 PM
"The Morganizer". He'll rearrange your face.

U-Warrior
08-01-2008, 04:18 PM
Yes, that's the move. THe move that requires the recipiant to do all the work.

Who cares? There are tons of moves like that in wrestling. Even the stunner requires more work from the recipient, to make it look good. Austin just falls on his ass.

Afterlife
08-01-2008, 05:02 PM
I can believe a stunner. It's simple, it's quick, it looks like it hurts.

The "Hellivator" is the Jackalope of wrestling moves.

Lux
08-01-2008, 11:02 PM
This is TNA we're speaking of, remember? They don't need a drawing board, they need someone to take their crayons away.

:lol: