And the Michael Bay Transformers movies make hundreds of millions of dollars. "Popular" does not equate to "good."

Praising one guy's slow motion promo style while bashing the exact same thing about another guy is fucking retarded.

What an absurd notion!

And there are definitely people who find whatever movie you probably swear is amazing to be a pile of shit. So clearly you're wrong there.

I feel like CSL came up with this idea like 2 pages ago.

Those people are idiots with bad taste. So clearly you're wrong, period.

THEY'RE BOTH DOING IT BECAUSE IT FITS THEIR CHARACTER. YOU EITHER FIND IT ANNOYING OR YOU DON'T.

Jesus. lol

Randy Orton might be the lamest cause for an argument ever.

We could very well enjoy the same movies. If we do, those who disagree with us are idiots with bad taste.

Unfortunately we differ on Randy Orton and you fall on the "idiots with bad taste" side.

Like we're using bandwidth arguing about Randy Orton.

It's a fucking Tables, Ladders and Podcast troll party in here.

Y'know, I'm in agreement. I don't even seriously dislike the guy as much as Jabba or AL; I just don't see the appeal, nor do I accept "it's popular therefore it's good" as a valid argument.

Well, yeah, it's our show; naturally we're gonna be active in it and defend the points we make.

You're being kind of silly. Why would we not interact in our own thread? And nobody is trolling.

It's not actually a good argument. But it worked in response to Jabba's "You're wrong" argument.

I mean... "No, you're wrong" could have worked too I guess.

You're wrong.

Hey, not bad.

No, YOU suck at assessing facts.

Man, I'm liking this strategy.

NOWWW PUTTTT THATTTT PAPERRR BAGGGG ONNNN YOURRR HEADDDDD.

To me he's very boring and predictable in the ring. The slow pace for a guy like him is just torture to the audience. Also, as stated, his promo work is pretty abysmal compared to others in the company.

I don't hate him or anything, it's just when people are huge marks for him I have a "What, really?" moment.

Not nearly as flawless and informative as the "but you're wrong" response.

Flawless.

Well, if people say he's good then I'm in. I didn't know that.

Now let's explain.

You see: The reasoning behind "what makes Orton a terrible professional wrestler" has been offered.

Unfortunately, the reasoning behind what makes Orton a great professional wrestler has also been offered.

It's strange. Those two ideas seem to contradict themselves. It's almost like it's less of a "YOU'RE SO WRONG! NUH UH! ALL YOU'RE SAYING IS 'HE'S GOOD!'" issue and more of a you refuse to find any points on the latter opinion valid. As I've done with the former.

But yeah, resorting to "You're wrong! You're just not listening!" and ignoring the other side's reasoning is a great way to make yourself feel like your reasoning is somehow more valid.

And this is the part where you just ignore the upcoming quotes and pretend what you just said is true to try to validate your point to yourself...

Orton is also a known huge fucking asshole as well. He got Amy Weber, Palmer Cannon, and Ken Kennedy fired because he's a child. On top of that, he's fairly unreliable, as he's had a couple wellness violations. When I add these things to him not entertaining me, it becomes clear (to me at least) that this guy should not be invested in too much further.