Thread: Another Star Wars trilogy?
View Single Post
Old 10-28-2010, 07:42 PM   #38
Fignuts
Hey Mister!
 
Fignuts's Avatar
 
Posts: 54,947
Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeritron View Post
The reason I think watching them in order of release is superior, is because that's the order they were written and I think intentional or not there is a lot of stuff in the prequels that is meant to be appreciate by those who have already seen the originals.
There are also cool things about watching it in the sequential order, but I think there's a sense of the originals already being common knowledge in the prequels.
Yoda's name isn't even mentioned until Episode 2. I think that happens with other characters too.
Plus you lose things like "Luke, I am your father", among others. I don't think I'd ever want to know the little green creature acting ridiculous towards Luke was Yoda. That's better as a suprise.
There is no doubt. Vader and Yoda's reveals are ruined if you watch them chronologically.
Fignuts is offline   Reply With Quote