Thread: Is everyone still mad at the WWE for naming their RAW title as the WWE Universal Championship?
View Single Post
Old 08-05-2016, 07:34 PM   #51
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishbone View Post
You've got two though. Calling them both the World Heavyweight Champion is just stupid. It's like how you've got a World Heavyweight Champion in every promotion in the world. How can they all be the World Champion? There's only one world. Having more than one just makes them all look cheap. If you're the champion of your promotion then that should be your title, not "champion of the world."
This is why such a soft brand split is dumb and potentially alienating to new viewers. When they had the WWE Title and World Title, at least you got the sense that one was the company's championship and the other was some sort of externally acquired championship. But then they unified them, produced a stale product and now they have to do something for attention again. This could have all been averted if they had just put focus into making SmackDown not shit.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote