Thread: Do you think we'll ever get a triple crown champion in wwe?
View Single Post
Old 10-23-2009, 03:44 PM   #15
Fignuts
Hey Mister!
 
Fignuts's Avatar
 
Posts: 54,947
Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ermaximus View Post
I say at WM, the main event should just be the champs of all 3 shows fighting it out for the undisputed supreme WWE Title. 1 champ to rule over all 3 shows.
This is what I was thinking to be the most obvious path to the triple crown happening. You wouldn't be able to keep all three titles on him for more than a month or so, hopwever, because you need to give the other shows something to do.

I'd actually make the winner defend all three titles in three seperate matches at backlash. So it would have to someone with good conditioning.
Fignuts is offline   Reply With Quote