View Single Post
Old 10-05-2011, 02:56 PM   #1046
Droford
 
Posts: 52,478
Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FearedSanctity View Post
Because he had a fucking ridiculous defense to piggyback off of, as evidenced by the stats you post.

For the first two years:
50.8 and 39.4 ratings? Fucking disgusting.
145.6 YPG and 111.5 YPG? Horrible.
1 TD and 6 INT? Ryan Leaf like.

He definitely did step it up the 3rd year, but to argue his greatness merely because he was QB at the time the Ravens D was winning the games? Come on bro
I think its funny you missed Peytons 31.2 QBR in 2002 in that lovely 41-0 loss to the Jets where he threw for 137 yards and 2 Ints...

I'll give you regular season stats

First few things I notice are how comparable they are in completion % and QB rating, and also how many more INTs Manning has thrown..obviously peyton's got the yards and TDs...

2008 Baltimore 16 16 11 428 257 60% 2,971 6.9 70 14 12 80.3
2009 Baltimore 16 16 9 499 315 63.1% 3,613 7.2 72 21 12 88.9
2010 Baltimore 16 16 12 489 306 62.6% 3,622 7.4 67 25 10 93.6

vs
1998 IND 16 16 3 326 575 56.7 3,739 6.5 26 28 71.2
1999 IND 16 16 13 331 533 62.1 4,135 7.8 26 15 90.7





2000 IND 16 16 10 357 571 62.5 4,413 7.7 33 15 94.7
Droford is offline