View Single Post
Old 09-06-2017, 04:26 PM   #22
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Cena vs Laraunaitis was a main event storyline with the heel authority figure's job on the line. It was miles ahead of two women fighting a match that's "super important because we're saying it is".

And I don't remember the amount of interference in Seth vs Owens but I don't see how that's relevant. It was the match between two main eventers for the main event title. It was the main event. The women's match was not built to make sense as a main event. It was built as good as most women's matches. It was midcard appeal thrown into the main event scene to force a "revolution".

In a world where WWE isn't trying to force this "women's revolution" thing and they still have PPV to sell, it has ZERO chance of headlining a PPV.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote