Thread: The Undertaker retired after WrestleMania 32?
View Single Post
Old 10-22-2016, 08:57 PM   #60
Fignuts
Hey Mister!
 
Fignuts's Avatar
 
Posts: 54,947
Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick View Post
See post above. Wyatt not an ICON.
I agree that at this point, an icon is the only type of wrestler that could believably end Taker's career, but a few years ago, I could have bought Wyatt as the guy, if his momentum had kept building.

Going into Wrestlemania 30, Wyatt was the strongest heel in the company outside of Brock, and the gap wasn't that wide. If he would have won the feud against Cena and been protected throughout the following year, that match would have felt iconic. It would have had the same magic that Jericho vs Micheals had.

But it's all hindsight. TAker lost to Brock, and wyatt was booked to lose so much that he lost that intimidating aura, and their match really didn't have any real hype at all going in.
Fignuts is offline   Reply With Quote