Thread: What was the point in HHH capturing the title?
View Single Post
Old 01-29-2016, 09:59 PM   #53
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I actually liked that idea for Bray Wyatt vs. Roman Reigns vs. Brock Lesnar at WrestleMania. Nice stuff, and something I actually hadn't thought of. The only other option that interests me is something fucking up the main event portion between Dean Ambrose and Roman Reigns leading to a Triple Threat against Triple H at WrestleMania for the title. They need someone actually likable in the title picture.

Triple H vs. Roman Reigns could have worked at WrestleMania, but not for the belt. Triple H isn't playing the heel character he arguably should for the feud. The whole context of the story doesn't really make sense. Reigns should have turned heel at Survivor Series and Brock should have won the Rumble.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote