Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickyTrickyDamon
I would say yes because both sides seemed to follow the terms of the agreement as if it was legal.
|
If it is deemed to be a "pledge" agreement and Corgan was licensed in TN as a pledge lender, then yes. If he was not licensed then, no, he's not entitled to any of his money back, nor Dixie's 92.5% interest in TNA.
If it is deemed a "general assignment" agreement, then he is entitled to his investment money back plus interest or he has the option of taking up to 36% interest in TNA instead of his money back.