View Single Post
Old 06-15-2016, 10:08 AM   #334
XL
Feeling Oof-y
 
XL's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,136
XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyman View Post
Guys,

I had a question about when X-Men I took place? (storyline wise). I realize that the movie took place in 2000 but if I recall correctly, the movie said something to the effect of, "in the not-so-distant future," (meaning, that perhaps the 'story' of X-Men may have taken place sometime between 2010-2015?).

Anyone know?

The reason why I ask is this: The next X-men movie (non-Wolverine Swan Song) is slated to take place in the 1990's. However - if the new 'cast' still looks noticeably younger than the cast that acted in the original X-Men, I think it will just make the whole thing look unrealistic?

However - if the next movie (storylines) takes place in say....1990, while X-Men I's storyline took place circa 2010-2015, then it makes things a bit more realistic in terms of how the characters looked/aged.
You're worried about the X-Men franchise looking realistic!?

Anywho, I believe the general rule is after the events of DOFP, we now have 2 timelines; one which has continued with Apocolpyse, the other is the original trilogy. So the Storm/Jean/Cyclops/etc. in the latest movie doesn't become the Equivalent from the original X-Men movie, i.e. Storm was born later/earlier in one time time compared to the other.

Doesn't explain how Havoc can be 20 years older than his brother and not appeared to have aged since the 1960s.
XL is offline   Reply With Quote