07-01-2004, 04:14 PM | #41 | |
That Entenbrot, The Mask
Posts: 56,852
|
Quote:
|
|
07-01-2004, 08:44 PM | #42 | |
Eh, **** it!
Posts: 2,896
|
Quote:
Anyways, I went and saw it today anyways. Kick ass movie. |
|
07-01-2004, 08:46 PM | #43 |
The Classic Dylan Staples
Posts: 51,134
|
I saw it, I knew what was coming so I wasn't really impressed. Dissapointed with the end a little.
|
07-01-2004, 10:37 PM | #44 |
Butterscotch McWilkens
Posts: 586
|
Hopefully gonna see it soon.
|
07-01-2004, 10:58 PM | #45 |
Posts: 240
|
Saw it, it was alright.
Best thing in it was J.K Simmons, plays Vern on Oz. he made me crack up every time he was on screen. Other than that it was pretty disappointing. Also, there is a good cameo but it would be a spoiler to reveal it. |
07-02-2004, 06:10 PM | #46 |
That's how I roll!!!
Posts: 4,437
|
What an awesome movie. 10 X better than the original
|
07-02-2004, 08:32 PM | #47 |
feel the madness
Posts: 11,360
|
The original was okay, not as bad as everyone thinks though because just like with the first X-Men they had to lay some groundwork which is in and of itself pretty boring.
|
07-02-2004, 10:48 PM | #48 |
Eh, **** it!
Posts: 2,896
|
Quck question? (spoiler)
Highlight now: What was up with him losing his powers? They never really said why he was losing them. |
07-03-2004, 12:20 AM | #49 |
Slackette
Posts: 9,928
|
Saw it today. Kinda disappointed.
|
07-03-2004, 12:28 AM | #50 | |
SEX APPEAL
Posts: 13,830
|
Quote:
I think it was something to do with his mental doubting of himself and all that.
I did see it today, and it was a good movie, not fantastic. I told that to a female friend of mine, and she says, "Obviously you didn't get the depth of the movie." Bitch. |
|
07-03-2004, 12:30 AM | #51 |
Slackette
Posts: 9,928
|
Chicks.
|
07-03-2004, 12:33 AM | #52 |
my other rides your mom
Posts: 6,346
|
Parts disapointed me but overal was a good movie
|
07-03-2004, 12:35 AM | #53 | |
LIMITLESS
Posts: 32,273
|
Quote:
|
|
07-03-2004, 12:37 AM | #54 | |
SEX APPEAL
Posts: 13,830
|
Quote:
OV *hump* ER *hump* RAT *hump* ED *hard hump* SAY *hump* IT!
|
|
07-03-2004, 01:13 AM | #55 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
I loved it. Then again, I am a hardcore Spidey fan.
|
07-03-2004, 02:21 PM | #56 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
|
Saw it last night, and absolutely loved it. J.K. Simmons was, as always, brilliant, and Alfred Molina is the absolute man. They could not have cast Ock any better than Molina. And they way they laid the groundwork for SM3 was great. They tied up some important loose ends in this one, but they left just enough open to warrant a third movie without making it seem forced. Will absolutely be at SM3 opening day.
|
07-03-2004, 04:09 PM | #57 |
Suicide's on the menu
Posts: 914
|
After thinking the first Spider-Man was lame and crappy, I went to see this one because I was a little interested [plus, the reviews were great]. I loved every minute of it. The story was good, it was hilarious at time, and the fights between Spiderman and Doc Ock were unreal. This movie felt much more like an adaptation of the comic book. I recommend people to see this movie even if you didn't like the first one, because this one blows it away.
|
07-03-2004, 09:07 PM | #58 |
Elitist Member
Posts: 15,438
|
I really enjoyed it alot.
I'm thinking that the story for the third one will be Spiderman getting the symbiote and then we see his change due to it, plus the Eddie Brock build up. Then it ends with him beating Harry to an inch of his life before realising what its doing to him and then spliting from it. Or it'll be a green goblin/lizard combo |
07-03-2004, 09:54 PM | #59 |
I Hate Bottles
Posts: 4,362
|
I saw it last night and was pretty disappointed. It wasn't terrible or anything, I just left the theatre feeling let down. I was really tired, that probably lowered my ability to enjoy the movie or something. Anyway, I'd give it like a 7 out of 10.
|
07-03-2004, 11:07 PM | #60 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
To me, it appears the spiderman movies will always end with you wanting more. As it should, if done sucessfully.
|
07-04-2004, 02:14 AM | #61 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
|
|
07-04-2004, 02:17 AM | #62 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
And yeah, he was torn as to what he wanted in life, and couldn't focus. Notice how his powers seemed to return fully when his two worlds collided. |
|
07-04-2004, 02:25 AM | #63 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Anyhow...It felt very comic book-y, without being a total departure from the first movie. I think I liked the pace of this movie a lot more than the first one. It felt more like Spider-Man.
they did a lot better making the Toby scenes mesh with the CGI scenes. I mean, it wasn't perfect, but who cares? I mostly found it to be distracting when the quality of the first one shifted from Lord of the Rings to Mighty Morphin power Rangers. The fight scenes were amazing. It was over the top without feeling totally cartoony. I'm just annoyed at how often Spider-Man got unmasked and some other small things. I don't like the way they seem to be following Batman in terms of the villains meeting their ends. I do like how they kept it flowing. I liked the set up for SM3, with a feeling of continuity, etc. Good movie. Greatest? I don't know. Overhyped? Definitely. But what isn't these days? |
07-04-2004, 02:33 AM | #64 | |
SEX APPEAL
Posts: 13,830
|
Quote:
"OH NO! I got hit by a few sparks and my mask is a bit charred, better take it off in this crowded subway!"
|
|
07-04-2004, 04:01 PM | #65 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
|
|
07-05-2004, 04:55 AM | #66 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just saw it tonight. It was pretty fucking terrible. Some of the dialogue made me want to kill somebody.
It really was painful to sit through. The action sequences were great, but the story... awful. It really was a piece of shit. I don't understand why everyone is loving it. I guess you had to read the comic book to appreciate it. Also, why the fuck did Kirsten Dunst leave her fiancée at the altar? That is a pretty dickhead thing to do. Maybe she could have made her decision a little earlier. |
07-05-2004, 04:57 AM | #67 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
Ebert called it the greatest super hero movie he's ever seen. And he praised the dialogue.
|
07-05-2004, 04:59 AM | #68 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What the fuck. The dialogue was TERRIBLE. I slapped my forehead at least twenty times during the movie. I was like what the fuck is this bullshit. GIMME A BREAK.
|
07-05-2004, 05:05 AM | #69 | |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
Quote:
|
|
07-05-2004, 05:23 AM | #70 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ebert is on crack lately. Also, he is a fat pig with the physique of a slave trader.
|
07-05-2004, 05:27 AM | #71 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
I noticed tonight that his chin doesn't come to a point. His face is completely rectangular.
|
07-05-2004, 12:38 PM | #72 |
Ninja Mod, Esquire
Posts: 12,676
|
Wow.. I think Ebert's taking some bribes.
|
07-05-2004, 03:03 PM | #73 |
Suicide's on the menu
Posts: 914
|
It's made $128.8 million in its first four days, which is the second-best four-day gross of all-time behind The Matrix: Reloaded.
|
07-05-2004, 08:05 PM | #74 | |
Suicide's on the menu
Posts: 914
|
Quote:
|
|
07-07-2004, 08:58 PM | #76 |
Butterscotch McWilkens
Posts: 586
|
I just came back form seeing it. It was pretty cool I guess. It was better than the first one. I expected it to be better though because of all the reviews.
|
07-08-2004, 12:39 AM | #77 | |
Crash Bang
Posts: 21,391
|
Quote:
|
|
07-08-2004, 12:40 AM | #78 |
Crash Bang
Posts: 21,391
|
There were many things in that movie that had no point. Like when he talked to that girl who gave him chocolate cake. Like WTF was that?
Pretty good movie. I wouldn't call it terrible, but I wouldn't call it the best superhero film I've ever seen. |
07-08-2004, 12:46 AM | #79 | |
LIMITLESS
Posts: 32,273
|
Quote:
|
|
07-08-2004, 12:52 AM | #80 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
There were a bunch of Hobgoblins too (at least 3, plus the Doppleganger "Demogoblin" and a false lead [Ned Leeds]). Hobby actually was created by a guy who stumbled across some of Norman Osbourne's old stashes. |
|