|
View Poll Results: Would you like to see Cena break Flair'a 16x world title record? | |||
Definitely | 8 | 24.24% | |
Probably | 2 | 6.06% | |
Matching the record would be best | 1 | 3.03% | |
Cena should probably stay at 15 | 2 | 6.06% | |
Cena should definitely stay at 15 | 7 | 21.21% | |
Irrelevant | 13 | 39.39% | |
Voters: 33. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-12-2016, 10:53 PM | #1 |
I have standards.
Posts: 445
|
Would you like to see Cena break Flair's 16x world champion record?
Felt like a poll.
|
10-12-2016, 11:14 PM | #2 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
|
It's all so convoluted with the fifty five versions of "world" titles and the 19 PPVs a year that breaking the record now doesn't really mean dick. I mean, Rollins is already a two time champ, ya know?
|
10-12-2016, 11:38 PM | #3 |
b/c 5 is better than 4
Posts: 9,721
|
My opinion does not matter as it seems like an inevitability that the record gets broken.
|
10-13-2016, 12:51 AM | #4 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,887
|
Think it is inevitable to be broken as title wins become more and more meaningless.... how many times does Reigns have it already.......... so sure, why not have Cena do it.....
|
10-13-2016, 01:32 AM | #5 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
|
Stay at 15 forrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeverrrrrrrrr.
|
10-13-2016, 01:56 AM | #6 |
LIMITLESS
Posts: 32,273
|
I would like Cena to stay at 15 until he apologizes for his shirt that denigrates STD's Irish ancestors.
|
10-13-2016, 05:49 AM | #7 |
TPWW's #3 Peep
Posts: 20,891
|
To be fair, some of Flair's reigns were pretty forgettable too.
But yeah, title wins happen all the time, it's gotta happen eventually. Cena more than deserves the honor. |
10-13-2016, 08:03 AM | #8 |
Best Poster
Posts: 56,904
|
I don't know why people care so much about this
|
10-13-2016, 08:18 AM | #9 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
Should stay at 15, a few of his title wins happened when he won the secondary championship when there were 2 world titles.
|
10-13-2016, 08:22 AM | #10 |
MVP Mark
Posts: 16,448
|
Want hin to break it badly. He carried the company through a terrible era and now that he is fading away you can see the ratings bombing hard. He may very well be the last mega superstar if WWE continues on their current path.
Plus, it will sell a ton of dvds so I think it will happen. |
10-13-2016, 08:33 AM | #11 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
|
10-13-2016, 08:40 AM | #12 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,167
|
It's irrelevant at this point. It's obviously going to happen.
|
10-13-2016, 09:03 AM | #13 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
|
10-13-2016, 10:58 AM | #14 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
How many of Cena's reigns came when both belts were active on one show?
|
10-13-2016, 11:20 AM | #15 |
Large Marge sent me
Posts: 32,246
|
It's a booked accomplishment. I don't care as long as the product I'm watching is entertaining.
Agree with Gertner. |
10-13-2016, 11:29 AM | #16 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
|
"Vince McMahon's imaginary brass rings"
|
10-13-2016, 11:36 AM | #17 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
|
10-13-2016, 11:57 AM | #18 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
He should tie and pass it. He's the man. Records are made to be broken.
|
10-13-2016, 12:34 PM | #19 |
Let me talk to ya
Posts: 11,749
|
Yeah I'd like to see it. Its going to happen so why not. He should tie it but I think they should wait until Wrestlemania. Have him hold it for a bit, drop it, and then win it back at Summerslam to break the record. I think the best option would be to let Styles keep the title and Cena win the Rumble to set that match up for Maina.
|
10-13-2016, 01:09 PM | #20 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,042
|
No
|
10-13-2016, 02:52 PM | #21 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
|
|
10-13-2016, 03:03 PM | #22 |
Posts: 3,664
|
|
10-13-2016, 03:08 PM | #23 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
|
10-13-2016, 03:36 PM | #24 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
|
10-13-2016, 04:25 PM | #25 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,042
|
|
10-13-2016, 04:46 PM | #26 |
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,588
|
Rather not although its probably inevitable considering the new brand split era and the WWE still not being able to move on from his era.
At this point, he doesn't really need to tie or break the record since his career is already legendary enough without it. Same for when there were talks about him being the one to break Taker's streak. |
10-13-2016, 05:54 PM | #27 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
|
Cena breaking the streak would have made more sense than Lesnar if it was something that just HAD to be done.
|
10-13-2016, 06:35 PM | #28 |
Posts: 3,664
|
|
10-13-2016, 06:39 PM | #29 |
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,588
|
Knowing the WWE, they probably would still have found a way to mess up giving the rub from beating Cena like they did with Lesnar. Taker should never have been the first guy to beat Lesnar clean after the streak was killed.
|
10-13-2016, 06:43 PM | #30 |
I have standards.
Posts: 445
|
I'm the only "probably" so far. That being said... I don't think Cena wants to break the title record. I think he wants to be remembered just as someone who gave more to wrestling than he took from it... which is exactly why I think he should be the one to whom you compare the next mega-champion.
|
10-14-2016, 05:22 AM | #31 |
Posts: 60,932
|
I'm with Gertner and Frank Drebin on this. I really don't care about this. If he's the right guy to carry the belt, then let him carry the belt. If he's not, then don't. Styles is doing well right now, so I wouldn't take it off him just to increase Cena's number. But I wouldn't keep Cena away from the belt just to protect an old record either.
I care more that there is a second belt in one company. |
10-14-2016, 09:18 AM | #32 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
More people view WWE content today than in any point in their history. I don't think that's BECAUSE of Cena, I give all glory to Vince, but your "facts" are just not based in reality. |
|
10-14-2016, 10:12 AM | #33 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,428
|
BAH GAWD THE PRODIGAL SON RETURNS
|
10-14-2016, 10:52 AM | #34 |
Posts: 10,642
|
CyNick, legit question. Surely you don't don't think Vince could've plucked anyone and made them the man in the 80s?
You don't think it was a combo of Vince having the foresight and vision to see Hogan and his company thriving while Hogan had the charisma and talent to take the ball and run? You don't think it was a joint success? |
10-14-2016, 10:55 AM | #35 |
Posts: 10,642
|
As for Cena, who cares? To me, winning a bunch of times doesn't hold any value. He wrestled in an era much different than Flair where title wins are more common. As long as he's entertaining, which I think he is at his peak of being right now, that's all that matters. Just give me my money's worth and I don't care about how many titles you win.
|
10-14-2016, 01:10 PM | #36 |
Roll +Sharp
Posts: 518
|
I'd like to answer this question, but unfortunately I can't see John Cena at all.
|
10-14-2016, 01:15 PM | #37 | |
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,042
|
Quote:
|
|
10-14-2016, 04:11 PM | #38 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
But I think Vince was the more important part of the equation. No way to prove this, but I believe Vince would have had more success without Hogan than Hogan would have without Vince. But of course, the unique set of skills they each brought to the table resulted in magic. |
|
10-14-2016, 04:18 PM | #39 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
As for revenue, do you knew what WWEs revenue was in 1987? |
|
10-14-2016, 04:21 PM | #40 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
|