12-14-2003, 12:04 PM | #1 |
SEX APPEAL
Posts: 13,830
|
Do you have to be negative to be a wrestling authority?
I've been reading lots of wrestling websites and I've noticed that people with positive views of wrestling aren't nearly as respected as those who talk about everything wrong with the product and how who they like is not getting pushed.
Take Scott Keith for example. He's one of the most widely known wrestling recappers on the web. He gets tons of hits on his stuff, he's written books, etc. Yet all he seems to do is criticize what he thinks they SHOULD be doing and all that. Now to my question, do you think you have to be negative to be a well respected wrestling authority? |
12-14-2003, 12:09 PM | #2 |
Shocker
Posts: 3,124
|
Opposition and critism always sells better than agreement. People don't want to buy books simply stating how great wrestling is.
|
12-14-2003, 12:37 PM | #3 |
Shocker
Posts: 3,124
|
You can criticize aspects of the show and still like it. You can also not enjoy the show at the moment, however hope for it to improve again.
Because you don't like a wrestler doesn't mean you don't like the WWE. And saying "I don't like Mark Henry because his matches are boring, and he has no charisma" is a valid reason not to like him. What would be the point of a wrestling discussion forum if we could do nothing but blindly praise the WWE? |
12-14-2003, 02:17 PM | #4 | |
SEX APPEAL
Posts: 13,830
|
Quote:
You make my disposition sad.
|
|
12-14-2003, 02:22 PM | #5 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
|
|
12-15-2003, 12:58 AM | #6 | |
Posts: 18,357
|
Quote:
Now, true, those who complain about EVERYTHING are annoying. But *NEWSFLASH* not everyone is like that! If you don't want to read so much negativity, don't come here! |
|