12-22-2015, 07:47 PM | #601 | |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
Quote:
Of course these Meltzer sheep will have you believe WWE had no plans for Cesaro just as they had for all those months prior to the injury and him jobbing to Big Show was a simple squash to put Show over for his Lesnar feeding. But the planned storyline that I just pulled out of my ass can't be proven wrong, so... CHECKMATE, MELTZER SHEEP! |
|
12-22-2015, 07:49 PM | #602 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
In all seriousness, that Daniel Bryan rationalization might be wrestling forum post of the year for all the wrong reasons. lol
Right up there with STD's "My ancestors didn't die to become John Cena t-shirts." or whatever it was. |
12-23-2015, 08:17 AM | #603 |
In His hands...
Posts: 25,168
|
Re-posting for greatness
|
12-23-2015, 10:14 AM | #604 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
But that's just me playing fantasy booker. I've said multiple times I don't know what the plans were. Just like nobody knows. I've said many times that it was possible Brysn WASNT going to win the title at Mania, but rather shortly thereafter. I also don't think Batista was ever going to be the champ coming out of Mania because they went right into the Evolution-Shield thing. And that served to establish Evolution and launched the Rollins heel turn, which was a focal point of storylines for the next 18 months. That seemed planned out, and wouldn't fit it Batista was the champ. To me the larger issue isn't whether Bryan was going to get the title at 30 or not (I do believe that was planned before Rumble). The issue is was WWE grooming him for the top spot. Who knows maybe they had an idea to do Batista v Bryan after Mania, and have Bryan win at that point. Regardless of what show it happened at, the company was behind it. It wasn't some grassroots campaign that got him pushed like they tell you it was on TV. |
|
12-23-2015, 10:22 AM | #605 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
When people state things as absolute fact - like just take this Bryan discussion. The real answer is nobody knows. I don't know the whole story, you don't know it, Meltzer doesn't know it, the janitor who stands by the toilet while the writing assistant is on the phone and stooges stuff off to the Sheetz doesn't know it. Likely only 4 or 5 people know it and they don't talk. But people on here will take fifth hand information and present it as fact. Or will take a guy saying something in kayfabe and pass it as reality. If you are being that cocksure about it, sure you should provide evidence. I have never stated my position as being a known fact. I just went by what I saw on TV. Bryan was pushed harder than anyone other than Cena week after week. And this was well before The Rumble. |
|
12-23-2015, 10:38 AM | #606 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
I challenge you to notice something with these debates. The people on here who CLAIM to be against my position that WWE is for the most part really great have the most detailed knowledge of storylines. #1fan or whatever that gimmick is, is probably the worst offender. He'll try to use these obscure details of storylines to "prove" WWE is terrible at writing. I'll open myself up here, but I don't watch every hour of WWE TV. I barely get the chance to watch all of RAW. I rarely watch Smackdown in its entirety and I don't watch anything else. But when I watch, 9 times out of 10 I say that was a good laugh and I let my fellow fans here know I enjoyed the show. The odd thing is the people who CLAIM to hate every aspect of the show, seem to watch in the most detail. So you're left with two options to explain this behaviour. Either they are lying, which I believe to be most likely, at the very least exaggerating their dislike of the show to align with the groupthink mentality of the IWC. Or they wish to punish themselves and watch something they don't enjoy week after week. I could see doing this for a month, maybe a year. But some people will reference terrible stuff from 15 years ago. Meaning they have been not enjoying the show longer than they enjoyed it. Weird behaviour if you ask me. I guess there is a third option, where people claim they hated the product, stopped watching, now just read about the product and then spend hours in their life posting in great detail about something they don't enjoy and don't watch and therefore can't formulate a worthwhile opinion on the product. Of course that would be utterly pathetic, so I don't think many fall into that category. |
|
12-23-2015, 10:41 AM | #607 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
|
12-23-2015, 11:01 AM | #608 |
In His hands...
Posts: 25,168
|
I was going more for the wank pheasant thing. Also, generally speaking, LOL = something being funny. Not sure where you think the fella is expressing his anger.
Lastly, Sheetz is a place that some gay guys go to when they wanna bang each other at 3AM on any given morning. No one, except Afterlife, gets his wrestling news from Sheetz. |
12-23-2015, 11:02 AM | #609 |
Posts: 3,755
|
I don't get what that has to with anything.
|
12-23-2015, 11:11 AM | #610 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
I'm fully supportive of your lifestyle choices. Don't need to know what you do at 3AM. |
|
12-23-2015, 11:34 AM | #611 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
|
12-23-2015, 11:56 AM | #612 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
But Bryan was interacting with the authority week after week calling him a B+ player. But then behind the scenes he's going over Cena clean, winning the title, only to get screwed by The Authority. If they didn't plan for him to headline he would be booked like someone like Ryback is today. |
|
12-23-2015, 12:19 PM | #613 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
He wasn't interacting with the authority at that time, he was 100% focused on Bray Wyatt.
|
12-23-2015, 01:42 PM | #614 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
|
12-23-2015, 01:54 PM | #615 |
Posts: 3,755
|
Because he wasn't. His feud with Wyatt started in October 27 and ran through that year's Rumble, which took place on January 26th. 4 months away from the main event in an unrelated feud while Cena and Big Show were working the main event picture.
So he received a quick push near the end of the summer, got a couple of rematches out of it, and was moved back down to feud with Wyatt. |
12-23-2015, 02:07 PM | #616 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
So he beats Cena clean for the title. Beats Orton. Main events several PPVs in a row. Is the main adversary of The Authority and that's "just a quick push". Those kool aid parties where you guys get your material must be a riot. |
|
12-23-2015, 02:09 PM | #617 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
Steve Austin wasnt fighting for the title in late 98 early 99. He was doing random stuff. Then they set the table for him at Mania. |
|
12-23-2015, 02:15 PM | #618 | |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
Quote:
During that time span the following following wrestlers were being pushed harder than Daniel Bryan John Cena Randy Orton CM Punk Roman Reigns Bray Wyatt |
|
12-23-2015, 02:22 PM | #619 |
Posts: 3,755
|
He won the title at one ppv were he lost it immediately after. That was started in August 18. He was out of the main event in October. You call that long term? Which feud lasted longer? The three matches in two months or the story line that played out through the end of January?
Per usual you make some false claim you failed to verify and now you're dancing around in circles. "Daniel Bryan v was pushed in the summer and fall" "He spent the fall and winter feuding with Wyatt" "Lol dispute factual evidence and avoid my initial claim" |
12-23-2015, 02:27 PM | #620 | |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,427
|
Quote:
|
|
12-23-2015, 02:30 PM | #621 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
Also after he lost to Orton in HIAC Orton once again beat him on Smackdown.
|
12-23-2015, 03:09 PM | #622 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,427
|
Also considering you are posting on a wrestling discussion forum and your critique is that someone highly critical of the product shouldn't be watching so much of it is pretty baseless, considering people like fan habe a passion and interest in wrestling.
And someone like me who doesn't watch much anymore isn't allowed an opinion because I don't watch enough. I can tell you that what I do watch and the results I see are not up to my set of standards. It So pretty much there is a finite amount you are allowed to watch to be able to have an opinion. And even then that opinion has to be your opinion or else we are Meltzer sheep. It can't be too much it can't be too little. Only the amount that the cynick watches. Step up your game, anus boy. Stop allowing weird personal bias get in the way of real discourse. |
12-23-2015, 03:22 PM | #623 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,427
|
Like I dont understand essentially criticizing people for watching too much wrestling when you yourself are posting on a forum dedicated to wrestling nerds.
You yourself are enough of a fan to defend the product til the death. How does that make you any less ridiculous than you are trying to make others out to be you Fucking weirdo lol |
12-23-2015, 04:05 PM | #624 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
The whole "You can't hate it if you follow it!" thing is the apologist way of defending the product against people who think it's shit when there is no other defense.
Dale hit the nail on the head. I have a love and passion for the wrestling business. When things are really bad, I'm gonna mention it. I tend to just look up results and watch clips of anything that seems watchable nowadays. I'm not gonna completely abandon it because I like the business and want to keep following it and hoping that it picks back up at some point. If you wanna do a point-counterpoint, we can do that all day. When you fail at that and fall back on "Well if it's so bad, why do you care!?" you're pretty much showing everyone how little of an actual defense you have to hold on to. It's a reach. |
12-23-2015, 04:26 PM | #625 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
Some people really like wrestling, so they watch when its on.
Some people really like Star Wars, so they watch the prequels. |
12-23-2015, 05:06 PM | #626 | |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,427
|
Quote:
But instead we're stuck with him feeding his own weird agenda. You want to see some great convos? Check out most arguments with Gertner when he wanted to talk wrestling. He hated most of the internet heroes and yet there were some great threads talking about the product with him. Sure he can be bombastic with the rest of them, but he clearly knew more about what he was talking about than Nick. |
|
12-23-2015, 07:18 PM | #627 |
Posts: 3,755
|
Gertner has the greatest heel trait in that what he speaks is true whether you like it or not. He spoke factually.
|
01-08-2016, 02:19 PM | #628 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
I can appreciate that. Sounds like I have a lot in common with this Gertner fellow.
I see ratings are back up now that football is over. The most watched show on cable on Monday by a large margin. |
01-08-2016, 04:37 PM | #629 |
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,084
|
Yes by 1%
|
01-08-2016, 04:38 PM | #630 |
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,084
|
Down 10% from last year
|
01-08-2016, 05:59 PM | #631 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
TV is down across the board.
Can only really compare to what's on today. I believe RAW had around 20% more viewers than the second most watched show on Monday. That's solid. And this is with a decimated roster. |
01-08-2016, 06:07 PM | #632 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,427
|
You don't hold a candle to gertner
|
01-08-2016, 06:31 PM | #633 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
|
01-08-2016, 06:44 PM | #634 |
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,084
|
Yeah but they advertised a title match with a special guest ref, it should have went up more than 1% imo
|
01-09-2016, 02:03 AM | #635 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Quote:
I would say having the most watched thing on cable on Monday is a success. They also have the most watched thing on cable on Thursday. Likely lots of champagne popping going on at USA. More evidence of WWE's power to draw in viewers on a regular basis. Really unmatched in the TV industry. |
|
01-10-2016, 04:53 PM | #636 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,427
|
|
01-10-2016, 04:56 PM | #637 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,427
|
I was talking to the COO of the company I work for as he is a friend of the family. And he was telling me that our company had a really MEH year when it came to making money.
He said "Yeah we always make money and we do okay, but we want to reach our goals and do really well" Just because you're barely doing okay is no reason to celebrate. They're literally the ONLY wrestling show that is known to the main stream and their results are MEH at best. No champagne is being popped you big doofus. |
01-10-2016, 09:54 PM | #638 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
When you didnt have shows on multiple days of the week that are drawing the largest audience on cable, and now you do, thats a reason to celebrate.
But I'm sure your CEO friend has never had a year where he was #1 at something in his industry, so probably not the right person to get an opinion from. |
01-10-2016, 09:57 PM | #639 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,427
|
Mm hmmm
|
01-15-2016, 07:49 PM | #640 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
I love when Dale loses a debate
|