|
View Poll Results: What Would You Rather Watch- WCW's Russo Era Or WWE's Current Product? | |||
WCW's Russo Era | 10 | 32.26% | |
WWE's Current Product | 21 | 67.74% | |
Voters: 31. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-05-2014, 02:51 PM | #1 |
Posts: 665
|
What Would You Rather Watch- WCW's Russo Era Or WWE's Current Product?
The tidez of war are turning,,,,, more sheep are being slaughtered,,,, people are finally realizing the truth,,, RUSSO IS GOD,,,, http://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31 TNARICK™ "The Legend" & R.I.C.K. Entertainment Provide you with the best forum signatures, topics, and polls available on the net. Reality Is Controlled Knowledge RUSSO 4 LIFE |
09-05-2014, 04:40 PM | #2 |
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
|
Current. Russos era had ZERO good matches.
|
09-05-2014, 04:41 PM | #3 |
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
|
At least with the garbage booking today the in ring product is top notch.
WORK RATE AND SHIT Russos era had a main event where the best worker was Jeff Jarrett.. Steiner, Steiner, Nash, Goldberg, Hogan, Flair, Jarrett, Macho, Sid Page and booker could have good matches but vy god it was awful in ring talent |
09-05-2014, 05:11 PM | #4 |
Posts: 665
|
View Poll Results: What Would You Rather Watch- WCW's Russo Era Or WWE's Current Product?
WCW's Russo Era 32 65.31% WWE's Current Product 17 34.69% Voters: 49. You have already voted on this poll |
09-05-2014, 05:16 PM | #5 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
I'd probably go with today's stuff as there's at least a slight chance it could get better. With Russo's WCW, well, we know how that ended.
|
09-05-2014, 05:29 PM | #6 |
EATER OF HOT POCKETS
Posts: 14,340
|
WWE's current booking is just underwhelming and disappointing. It's not the appalling filth that was Russo's WCW.
|
09-05-2014, 05:40 PM | #7 | |
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
next. |
|
09-05-2014, 07:24 PM | #8 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
I'm gonna say the current product only because I like the talent and the use of part-timers.
If you had said BOOKING, I don't know. I think I prefer bad ideas to no ideas at all. So I might be inclined to go with Russo. |
09-05-2014, 07:34 PM | #9 |
Fire up Chips!
Posts: 27,456
|
WWE today bc I don't have brain damage
|
09-05-2014, 07:44 PM | #10 |
it's really real meat
Posts: 7,366
|
I remember Randy Savage and DDP having an epic match one thunder one time. it lasted 3 minutes and ended in dq after a couple run ins
|
09-06-2014, 12:28 AM | #11 |
As over as Crystal Pepsi
Posts: 21,639
|
You were able to make a thread that didn't involve cutting and pasting from Russo's blog?
Neat. |
09-06-2014, 01:10 PM | #12 |
Alive
Posts: 13,683
|
Russo's WCW would've given us gold to talk about every week on TLP, regardless of how good or awful it was. It's a struggle to find anything to talk about in WWE's current programming sometimes.
|
09-07-2014, 03:59 AM | #13 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
|
Looks like the sheep have spoken TNA Prick. Might be time to pack it in and call it a life.
|
09-07-2014, 04:01 AM | #14 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
|
How do you feel being the only one to agree with TNA Rick. Bow your head in shame.
|
09-07-2014, 07:53 AM | #15 |
EATER OF HOT POCKETS
Posts: 14,340
|
|
09-07-2014, 08:52 AM | #16 |
Narc stole my star
Posts: 6,110
|
WCW was fun to watch.
WWE is too bland IMO, espesh when Lesnar ain't there. |
09-07-2014, 12:02 PM | #17 |
Posts: 206
|
I voted for Russo's WCW. It was the shits, but like previous posters have mentioned, it was compelling shit. Gave you something to talk about, unlike now, where it is so boring.
|
09-07-2014, 02:20 PM | #18 |
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,084
|
I dunno Last Raw was 3 hours of nothing....on the other hand WCW had Jeff Jarrett....They both suck. But this Mondays raw might be good.
|
09-07-2014, 03:59 PM | #19 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
|
7 retards.
|
09-07-2014, 04:06 PM | #20 |
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,084
|
hey be nice
|
09-07-2014, 04:21 PM | #21 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
|
|
09-07-2014, 08:24 PM | #22 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
I'd post a plethora of videos showing WWE's terrible booking but most of it isn't even notable enough to warrant Youtube videos. And therein lies the difference. Noteworthy 15 years later vs Shit you completely forget a week later.
|
09-08-2014, 11:34 PM | #23 |
EATER OF HOT POCKETS
Posts: 14,340
|
Again, "noteworthy?" The Gobbledygooker was noteworthy, Katie Vick was noteworthy, David Arquette as WCW champion was noteworthy. Doesn't mean they were good or should have happened.
|
09-08-2014, 11:46 PM | #24 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
I think I would take any one of those over literally nothing of note happening whatsoever.
|