02-16-2009, 09:18 AM | #161 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Looking at his part even now in the pic.
|
02-16-2009, 09:59 AM | #162 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
Well look at any of the sites you got that pic from. They don't list Demolisher as a part of devastator, and he's got his own toy.
|
02-16-2009, 10:45 AM | #163 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
You're crazy, man. Crazy.
|
02-16-2009, 04:39 PM | #164 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Extended Trailer HD:
|
02-18-2009, 07:44 PM | #165 |
Whoaball!
Posts: 457
|
|
02-18-2009, 07:56 PM | #166 |
Posts: 19,294
|
LOL It looks like he has a cock and balls
|
02-18-2009, 09:08 PM | #167 |
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,362
|
This is gona be confusing for people that aren't into the cartoons, we had "devestator" (brawl) in the first one geting fucked up now in the sequel we have something by the same name but looking totally different.
Thats assuming of course they actually keep the name devestator. I dont get how that wheel thing was only one of the constructicons, if thats just one (and it looked to be 1.5-2.5x the size of prime) id hate to see how large the fully assembled devestator is. The decepticons badly need mroe screen time to develop their characters more, i think that would be more interesting than listening to labeouf say "nonononononononononnnonononononno" like he does in every fucking movie he's ever been in. Last edited by Gerard; 02-18-2009 at 09:19 PM. |
02-18-2009, 09:25 PM | #168 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
PROTIP: Those casual audience you talk about won't remember there was a robot named Devestator in a minor role in the last one. They'll see the familiar old robots battling new and bigger robots. They'll eat it up and there's nothing confusing in a Michael Bay movie about fighting robots.
|
02-19-2009, 02:21 AM | #169 |
Shadow Conspircy leader
Posts: 18,579
|
What Jeritron said.
|
02-19-2009, 08:17 AM | #170 | ||
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-19-2009, 12:28 PM | #171 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
|
>
|
02-19-2009, 12:32 PM | #172 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
|
|
02-19-2009, 02:29 PM | #173 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
That trailer is awesome.
|
02-19-2009, 02:30 PM | #174 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Yea
|
02-19-2009, 02:53 PM | #175 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
|
02-19-2009, 02:55 PM | #176 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
|
CAUSE I'M A TRANSFORMERS TRADITIONALIST AND THIS ISN'T WHAT I'M ABOUT. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
I hate the look of the robots. |
02-19-2009, 03:00 PM | #177 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
BDC, you stagger me. You'll brood around the wrestling forum complaining about the logic behind wrestling 101 faces/heels, but disregard logic in making a transformer for a movie into a jet instead of a tape recorder.
|
02-19-2009, 03:00 PM | #178 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
<3 I guess
|
02-19-2009, 03:01 PM | #179 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
|
02-19-2009, 03:01 PM | #180 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
|
02-19-2009, 03:02 PM | #181 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
I guess you can take comfort by devising a way to construe this as non-canon
|
02-19-2009, 03:08 PM | #182 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
|
02-19-2009, 03:10 PM | #183 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Are arm cannons canon?
|
02-19-2009, 03:11 PM | #184 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Common sense even, Bay never set out to rewrite the mythology.
None of these directors ever do, it's just certain people make them out to be. When in doubt, go back to source material - problem solved. I don't like the Evangelion revamp (hate it even), but guess what; original box set awaits my viewing pleasure. I win. Same outcome if Weta fucks up the live-action production. Nobody's ruining anybody's childhoods. |
02-19-2009, 03:13 PM | #185 | |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
|
Quote:
I can deal with Megatron being some sort of flying thing, but come on, Soundwave, does that sound like the name of a robot jet? |
|
02-19-2009, 03:14 PM | #186 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
|
|
02-19-2009, 03:15 PM | #187 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Why not? And please with all those names. As far as I know only one of those is in the movies. And does it sound like the name of a robot jet? Yes. It does. Seeing as jets break the sound barrier and what not. Sounds just as much like a jet as any of the other names sound like what they are.
|
02-19-2009, 03:16 PM | #188 | |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Quote:
|
|
02-19-2009, 03:26 PM | #189 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Perfect. Slightly off topic but the themes match. I'm pretty much with this guy 90% of the way, but I do think there were good game-movies.
I have this thread coming up that actually goes into how I think videogame/comic/geek-fare movies have been reviewed incorrectly for the last 10 years, but I'm still working out that piece. |
02-19-2009, 03:32 PM | #190 |
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,362
|
|
02-19-2009, 03:43 PM | #191 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Bay wins. |
02-19-2009, 03:46 PM | #192 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
|
Actaully the devistor toy, the only really problem I have is the face. I hate its face. The colors don't bother me at all.
|
02-19-2009, 03:50 PM | #193 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Better than Barricade bug-face.
|
02-20-2009, 01:42 PM | #194 |
Whoaball!
Posts: 457
|
I still don't see why anyone can really get "excited" for this movie.
|
02-20-2009, 01:47 PM | #195 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
It's giant transforming robots beating the shit out of one another.
If you can't get excited by that, then you need prozac. |
02-20-2009, 02:43 PM | #196 |
Whoaball!
Posts: 457
|
Mayhaps. I just don't see "Wooo! A shitty movie!" as a natural battlecry.
|
02-22-2009, 12:54 PM | #197 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Alan... The Rapist.
|
02-22-2009, 01:50 PM | #198 | |
"Ask him!"
Posts: 10,072
|
Quote:
Everything can't be "The Wrestler," you know? |
|
02-23-2009, 10:31 PM | #199 |
Bo Knows
Posts: 2,786
|
|
02-25-2009, 05:37 PM | #200 | |
Whoaball!
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
And besides, "The Wrestler" -- which I haven't seen -- IS entertainment. Any movie that's good is entertaining. That is to say, it doesn't have to be mindless drivel to be entertaining: it has to make you happy that you watched. And a sloppy sequel to a sloppy movie doesn't strike me as entertainment. If that's what you call enticing, then that's great. But bad is still bad. |
|