TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum
Reload this Page Should the "big gold belt" be reactivated?
Register Members List

View Poll Results: Should the "big gold belt" be reactivated?
Yes 5 17.86%
No 12 42.86%
I'm fine with superstars in the upper echelon holding secondary titles 9 32.14%
Maybe another title? (Explain yourself) 2 7.14%
Voters: 28. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-25-2015, 01:29 AM   #1
GD
 
Posts: 58,590
GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Should the "big gold belt" be reactivated?
With Brock Lesnar being reserved as a "special attraction" and WWE having monthly pay-per-view events, would it make sense to reactivate the big gold belt and have a new primary world champion to add value to the current product?

Feel free to share your opinions
GD is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.

Forums Home - TPWW - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®