03-28-2012, 03:52 PM | #41 |
Posts: 1,487
|
|
03-28-2012, 03:56 PM | #42 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
We know you are gay for guys with tattoos.
|
03-28-2012, 04:27 PM | #43 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
|
03-28-2012, 04:52 PM | #44 |
On-nO Asscii to Asscii
Posts: 10,214
|
MW3 is great, and if you don't think so maybe you should just go sell your copy.
The best thing about those changes to me is no more aim assist with sniper rifles. Begone, quickscoping faggots, begone. |
03-28-2012, 05:51 PM | #45 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
MW3 is terrible compared to Black Ops. The only good things about MW3 is the killstreak system and the survival mode.
|
03-28-2012, 06:06 PM | #46 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
I am a little disappointed Infected won't be returning tho.
|
03-28-2012, 06:12 PM | #47 |
Angel Headed Hipster
Posts: 37,942
|
Any source on all that besides "the internet"?
|
03-28-2012, 06:32 PM | #48 | |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
Quote:
It is, the only thing I can think of besides what you said is my favorite gun is in MW3. Then again, the PSG1 was pretty badass. |
|
03-28-2012, 07:05 PM | #49 |
History's Greatest, Mr. E
Posts: 42,425
|
|
03-28-2012, 07:06 PM | #50 |
History's Greatest, Mr. E
Posts: 42,425
|
If they take aim assist out then there will be no need to quickscope-- haven't we been down this road?
|
03-29-2012, 08:18 AM | #51 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
There are likely going to be people who will still try it. Blops made an effort to hinder it, yet people still did it. Yes, aim assist still helped.
Id really like to see if any of them are good enough to do it without aim assist. |
03-29-2012, 10:46 AM | #52 |
Selectively Social
Posts: 16,336
|
|
03-29-2012, 10:47 AM | #53 |
Posts: 1,487
|
|
03-29-2012, 09:01 PM | #54 |
'12 Tipsters Champ!
Posts: 2,359
|
Anything on Zombies? One of the things I love in the Treyarch franchise.
|
03-29-2012, 11:10 PM | #55 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
I was thinking about this today and I really enjoyed BlackOps. The only thing they are doing is making it better. Honestly excited.
|
03-29-2012, 11:56 PM | #56 | ||
History's Greatest, Mr. E
Posts: 42,425
|
No, there are likely going to be people who do not try it seeing as how the feature that made it possible for an instant lock-on kill is going to be completely taken out. Those who do try are idiots.
Quote:
Quote:
If they do, then it's most likely an instance of just having fun and screwing around. No one would attempt a quickscope for an advantage if it has been taken out of the game. |
||
03-29-2012, 11:58 PM | #57 |
History's Greatest, Mr. E
Posts: 42,425
|
This is all depending on if this information is true and what exactly the mechanics are of "No aim assist for any sniper rifle." Could still be something in the engine that makes the aiming lock on, or some other exploit. Could be telling the truth and they fixed it or it could be all bullshit. We'll have to see.
|
03-30-2012, 09:47 AM | #58 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
Of course. I am not seeing anything that isn't a possibility or outside the realm of one so in taking this at face value.
Blops had it where SoH didn't allow faster ADS in Sniper Rifles. That's what I meant as hinder. Not sure it did much though. Lastly, the people who quickscoped before likely have a decent idea where the center of their screen is by now. Of course aim assist was the primary reason why people used it. Id like to see if they are skilled enough from doing it with aim assist to do it without. |
03-30-2012, 11:07 AM | #59 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
head explodes
|
03-30-2012, 11:09 AM | #60 | |
Southern Hospitality
Posts: 9,437
|
Quote:
|
|
03-30-2012, 04:01 PM | #61 |
On-nO Asscii to Asscii
Posts: 10,214
|
I didn't mind last stand so much in Blops, because if you put someone into last stand and someone else finished them off you still got credit for the kill.
|
03-30-2012, 04:31 PM | #62 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
That is irritating in MW3. Ill snipe and try to pump that second shot in someone but some bastard will steal it on me
|
03-30-2012, 05:42 PM | #63 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
I don't understand why IW didn't carry over that and the number of captures/defends on the domination scoreboard.
|
03-30-2012, 07:42 PM | #64 |
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,588
|
Might be related to the former IW bosses "hating" Treyarch and not wanting to use anything they've work on. Also really hated them for being able to modify an engine they said was impossible to do.
Same reason why no Zombies in MW games and their refusal to fix the multiplayer while Treyarch games had stuff hated from a MW game fixed up a bit for their games. |
04-02-2012, 12:14 PM | #65 |
Southern Hospitality
Posts: 9,437
|
|
04-02-2012, 03:07 PM | #66 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
Only if they had the pro version. And honestly, people hate last stand enough, saw a handful of people get revived in Black Ops' entire run.
|
04-02-2012, 06:56 PM | #67 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
|
04-02-2012, 07:03 PM | #68 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
Nah, fuck that, not reviving last stand tards in Domination.
|
04-02-2012, 07:07 PM | #69 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
|
04-02-2012, 09:45 PM | #70 |
I'ma gonna win
Posts: 1,743
|
I don't see why you wouldn't revive a team mate in any mode.
Seems silly. |
04-02-2012, 09:47 PM | #71 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
|
04-02-2012, 10:31 PM | #72 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
Kills don't win Domination, so it doesn't matter. I've done amazing in Domination games, easily doubling the next guy in points/kills and still been on the losing team because I'm the only one on my team capping and defending flags.
|
04-02-2012, 10:59 PM | #73 |
Posts: 19,294
|
Kills don't win domination, but how does letting your teammate die and have to go through a respawn timer and likely run across the map, help your team at all?
That's retarded logic. Oh hey, my teammate is downed and we're trying to get to the objective.. so I'm just gonna let him die so he has to run all the way back here and take more time getting to the objective; not to mention, I'll run into battle with one less person there to help. Edit: Actually, kills -do- win domination. Assuming your team is pushing toward an objective and not just -completely- retarded, the team that can outkill the other typically wins. Allowing your teammates to die because you're selfish and don't want to take the time to revive them, is stupid and makes no sense. |
04-03-2012, 09:09 AM | #74 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
Kills get Killstreaks, Killstreaks cause problems. Best plan? Don't get killed or let others get killed.
|
04-03-2012, 10:33 AM | #75 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The BL in Black Ops should stand for Brock Lesnar and the game should involve punching people in the face
|
04-03-2012, 03:38 PM | #76 |
Retired Prolly.
Posts: 11,296
|
Req, posting in a thread about a game series he hates, again.
9/10 times if someone capping a point with you has last stand, the guy that put him in last stand is gonna kill him. Or since I play ground war, 1 of the 50 grenades thrown at the flag is gonna kill him. And if he's helping me cap and I actually have a chance to, I'll revive him. But you can still cap in last stand, and I'd rather not be defenseless for those few seconds reviving him and we both die and don't get the flag. But I'm not gonna go out of my way to revive the guy in last stand that's camping in a building or no where near any of the flags and is not capping or defending shit. My team getting the flags and keeping them is more important then the other team getting 1 kill. My point stands tho, kills don't matter in Domination. I've seen youtube commentators have amazing k/d ratios in Domination, ones that I'd love to have in a TDM, but they lose the match. Not sure I was gonna post this, but fuck it, first and only "req post" from me. |
04-03-2012, 06:30 PM | #77 |
Posts: 19,294
|
I notice you, more than anyone else, seem to bring that up as if 'me' posting something is somehow a magic shield that protects you from the stupidity of your own logic. Black Ops was my favorite of the CoD series. My complaints have been almost exclusively about EA and Infinity Ward. I didn't purchase MW3 as proof of my disdain for that series. Blops received a few complaints about features, but I feel the time I spent playing it was worth the money. Black Ops 2 actually has potential to be a decent game, if only because it is a Treyarch game.
With that pointless distraction out of the way... :rol l: You obviously fail to understand basic FPS tactics. Minch pretty much said it already. I don't know why you wouldn't revive someone in -any- game mode. There is no con that outweights the many pros. Preventing killstreaks, respawn times, and distance from spawn to objectives. Not even accounting for how helpful it is to have a second person alive to help you, potentially get more kills, continue THEIR killstreak, or even be there to take a bullet instead of you in a time when it would really matter. |
04-03-2012, 06:34 PM | #78 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
Also, want to add the most obvious thing ever here.
If you do it for him, you could be the guy with your back on the ground next time. |
04-04-2012, 01:42 AM | #79 |
On-nO Asscii to Asscii
Posts: 10,214
|
For the record this is a stupid argument, but hey, may as well point out why this is stupid.
The killstreak argument generally goes out the window though when you're talking about reviving someone. When if ever does someone get put in last stand and a team mate revives him before the attacker is dead? If anything the killstreak argument would work against what you're both saying, because when you try to revive someone there's a good chance you're both going to die if the attacker is still alive. Dead attacker = ended kill streak. |
04-04-2012, 10:27 AM | #80 |
Posts: 19,294
|
So that one thing negates everything else?
|