07-21-2014, 12:16 PM | #1 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
Rollins vs Ambrose
With that match not taking place on the "PPV" and WWE pushing their network. It seems that WWE feels that they do not need to have the match on the PPV they advertise it for. Do you think we will see more of this in the future? What are your thoughts on it?
|
07-21-2014, 12:18 PM | #2 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
FTR I was disappointed when I heard they were going to have it at BattleGround, I always thought it should take place at SummerSlam, but I would have steered away from a bait and switch.
|
07-21-2014, 12:19 PM | #3 |
the heartbreak king
Posts: 48,431
|
I hope not. While I get what they did las night and think it actually benefis the feud, it felt like something they should have accomplished during the course of a raw.
|
07-21-2014, 04:19 PM | #4 |
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,588
|
No. If they pull too many bait-and-switches, all its going to do is cause a lot of resentment and less people willing to order their ppvs or renew their Network subs.
|
07-21-2014, 04:26 PM | #5 |
3 Dicks Out For Trips
Posts: 29,658
|
Rollins was still limping around a bit last night. Think that 'injury' angle from RAW/Smackdown was legit, but it wasn't a major injury. More like a minor sprain or something. Seems like they didn't mind using all the backstage segments and stuff to keep the feud going while giving Rollins a little more time to heal up before they have the match, which will prob be at SS now I'm assuming.
|
07-21-2014, 08:16 PM | #6 |
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,084
|
Yes but it also made better booking sense to have the match at SS
|