01-02-2010, 08:54 PM | #121 |
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
|
Paul Rudd is the next Bill Murray. I said it.
|
01-02-2010, 09:00 PM | #122 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Jason Segel would also be fine with me
|
01-03-2010, 03:14 AM | #123 |
I'ma gonna win
Posts: 1,743
|
|
01-03-2010, 04:31 PM | #124 |
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
|
FACT: Bill Murray was the next Walter Matthau.
FACT: Paul Rudd is the next Bill Murray. |
01-03-2010, 04:40 PM | #125 |
Jamiroquai Bodega
Posts: 18,627
|
jason segal would be perfect
|
01-13-2010, 01:27 PM | #126 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62369
Okay, so this is really starting to take shape heading into the summer |
01-13-2010, 11:39 PM | #127 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
C'MON PEOPLE
|
01-14-2010, 08:26 AM | #128 |
Southern Hospitality
Posts: 9,437
|
There is not words that could express my excitement
|
03-28-2010, 04:17 PM | #129 |
Posts: 6,269
|
If it's going to be some lame, "passing the torch" movie about the older ghostbusters mentoring new ghostbusters like the rumors say, then I give a big to the whole thing.
However, if it's going to be like "Space Cowboys" where the old ghostbusters return to save the day, then I'm all for it |
03-29-2010, 03:18 PM | #130 |
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
|
|
03-29-2010, 04:09 PM | #131 |
That's How Baseball Go
Posts: 85
|
As long as whoever they bring in possess 2 Key Traits.....
THEY GOTTA HAVE THE TOOLS, THEY GOTTA HAVE THE TALENT! Last edited by ORANGE-LOCKE; 03-29-2010 at 04:11 PM. |
03-29-2010, 07:11 PM | #132 |
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
|
The issue is, if Sony Pictures say "we don't want you Ivan", Reitman has the power to say "no more Ghostbusters for you". Like a movie nazi.
|
03-29-2010, 07:13 PM | #133 |
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
|
|
03-29-2010, 07:43 PM | #134 |
Posts: 6,269
|
I'm with Reitman.
|
03-30-2010, 01:36 AM | #135 |
Shadow Conspircy leader
Posts: 18,579
|
|
04-04-2010, 09:48 PM | #136 |
Posts: 6,269
|
|
04-04-2010, 10:31 PM | #137 |
Selectively Social
Posts: 16,336
|
god this movie is gonna be so horrible
|
04-05-2010, 06:11 AM | #138 | |
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,362
|
Quote:
|
|
04-05-2010, 06:15 AM | #139 |
Posts: 6,269
|
The original source is Bloody Disguising. They've proven to be a good source. Plus, don't know if you saw the clip of Bill on Letterman, or heck, read/listened to any of his interviews in regards of Ghostbusters 3, but he's really not into it.
|
04-06-2010, 03:09 AM | #140 |
Posts: 3,755
|
Honestly, if Reitman isn't helming, they should probably cancel it out all together. The franchise has a nice legacy, and getting a new director could lead to a clunker that could leave the franchise ending on a sour note.
I would love a 3rd and final installment, but Sony has to treat this as a big deal and put the quality of the film first. |
04-07-2010, 02:41 PM | #141 |
I'ma gonna win
Posts: 1,743
|
It's pretty well known that Bill Murray hates playing Peter Venkman, yet they act surprised when he isn't excited to do the role again?
|
04-07-2010, 02:46 PM | #142 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Yea, but he was excited about playing the role again. He suddenly had a big turn around and got enthusiastic about doing a third Ghostbusters. In numerous interviews, reports, and an appearance on Good Morning America, he expressed how eager he was to do it. That's why the project finally started moving forward again after years on the backburner.
He even reprised the role for a video game, of all things. Now, all of a sudden, this is being reported. I'm beginning to wonder if he's bipolar |
04-08-2010, 12:16 AM | #143 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
Why does he hate it so much in the first place? It's not some crazy character or anything.
|
04-08-2010, 12:23 AM | #144 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,868
|
Because it would please people on the internet, and everybody hates people on the internet.
|
04-08-2010, 05:43 AM | #145 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
If he was willing to do TWO Garfield films, he should reprise the role of Venkman.
The reason the movie never got made in the 90s was him. He was able to block production, and didn't cooperate at all. He wanted nothing to do with it, so they gave up. At the time, I think he was going through his "serious actor" phase and didn't want anything to do with silly things like Ghostbusters and his old SNL/National Lampoon's buddies. He was in with the Wes Anderson crowd. But in recent years he started to do more kids movies and cameos, and eventually Ghostbusters 3 came back to life. I have been following the development of this movie since a time where my only internet access was Web TV at my grandparent's house. |
04-08-2010, 06:08 AM | #146 |
Posts: 6,269
|
Check out what he said at the end of this interview a few weeks ago -
I know it's a joke, but he told that same story in another interview, and in all seriousness, it was probably those people who gave him the "Get over it Pal" look when he was singing the Ghostbusters theme that caused him to change his mind again. And others like that. Rich snobs. And it just hit something in him, and made him worry that, that is how he will come across if he did another Ghostbusters, and he doesn't want that image. Shoot, those people who looked at him probably had never even seen the Ghostbusters films, and were just being snobby pricks. On the otherhand, if the whole movie is just suppose to be some lame "pass the torch" flick, then I agree with Bill about not doing it. I rather it be the old-school ghostbusters coming back, and kicking some ass. Last edited by Zeeboe; 04-08-2010 at 06:11 AM. |
04-08-2010, 06:19 AM | #147 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
I would argue that he should get over doing guest spots in movies like City of Ember and make a movie that the masses want
|
04-08-2010, 06:38 AM | #148 |
Posts: 6,269
|
The thing is, if the movie bombs, those people will turn on Bill.
|
04-08-2010, 07:31 AM | #149 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Ghostbusters 3 will not bomb. Even if it was blasted critically, it would still have a massive box office
|
04-08-2010, 02:34 PM | #150 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
Yeah what? Ghostbusters would make a ton of money. And Murray has way too much credibility for his reputation to get hurt by being in a movie that fails, critically.
|
04-08-2010, 03:35 PM | #151 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
He was in Garfield 2: A Tale of Two Kitties. Ghostbusters 3 could be the worst movie ever made, and he will still be a legend because he's Bill Murray.
Nobody in their right mind is going to look down on him, or the other members of the cast, for coming back to do this movie and give it a try. People have always loved Ghostbusters, and it's really been underdone. It's not like they're beating a dead horse or bleeding it dry. |
04-08-2010, 04:31 PM | #152 |
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,362
|
Hope they don't fuck with the formula, new writers usally means people that want to change shit thats been established just for the sake of changing it. Hopefully ecto goes back to what it was in the original and they don't fuck with the look of the proton packs or trap. Be interesting to see if they could somehow bring back Stay Puft, probably the best known "evil" character of the franchise.
|
04-08-2010, 04:42 PM | #153 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
That would probably be Slimer, who would more than likely be a guarunteed cameo
|
04-08-2010, 04:54 PM | #154 | |
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
|
Quote:
Also, while I've said they should keep the streams exactly as they were in the original, I'd expect there to be more than a few upgrades to the equipment, including streamlining the look. This, of course, assumes that they've been active for the last 20 years. For all we know the story could be that they went out in the mid-90s and have to get the old equipment out of storage because of a crisis. SPOILER: show Last edited by Xero; 04-08-2010 at 05:06 PM. |
|
04-08-2010, 04:56 PM | #155 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
I don't think they should change the ecto. It's a 1950s Cadillac ambulance. It's just as out of date now as it was in 1984. I think it's so iconic that is should stay
|
04-08-2010, 04:57 PM | #156 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Everybody can relax, we found the car...
|
04-08-2010, 05:00 PM | #157 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
|
04-08-2010, 05:02 PM | #158 |
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
|
Is the Ecto 1A/B the Ecto 1 upgraded or an entirely different car in canon? Because they have 1B in the game, which looks pretty similar to 1A from GB2.
If it's Ecto-1, logically they should never go back. Last edited by Xero; 04-08-2010 at 05:06 PM. |
04-08-2010, 05:17 PM | #159 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,868
|
They should make a cartoon movie from the game for those of us who don't have or play games.
|
04-08-2010, 05:19 PM | #160 |
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
|
They should just CGI the whole game.
But really, you could just look up the cut scenes plus play throughs of the major boss battles on YouTube. It'd be basically the same. Last edited by Xero; 04-08-2010 at 05:24 PM. |