07-07-2010, 01:10 PM | #81 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
I just saw that the first batch of reviews are coming in for this and they're all very positive.
I think it has 100% on rottentomatoes atm, if only out of 10 or so reviews |
07-07-2010, 02:34 PM | #82 |
It's High Noon!
Posts: 15,703
|
Can't wait to see this during the weekend.
|
07-07-2010, 02:37 PM | #83 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Same here
|
07-07-2010, 02:59 PM | #84 |
It's High Noon!
Posts: 15,703
|
|
07-07-2010, 03:40 PM | #85 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Predator movies usually don't see that many survivors
|
07-07-2010, 03:47 PM | #86 |
It's High Noon!
Posts: 15,703
|
|
07-07-2010, 03:55 PM | #87 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
The rule of all slasher or monster movies tends to be that one male and one female survive
|
07-07-2010, 07:23 PM | #88 |
Posts: 1,920
|
Loving the trailers and art direction of the film. I am glad movie studios have not given up on the Predator franchise yet. I personally hated the first AVP but I loved the second one. Even resembled a couple of the old comics. This one seems to have a comic book feel from the Predator comics from the 90's. Can't wait.
|
07-08-2010, 07:16 PM | #89 |
dirty irani
Posts: 11,955
|
Saw it tonight, was impressed with it overall but their was far too many references to the first film.
|
07-08-2010, 08:00 PM | #90 |
LUV CABBAGE/H8 JEWS
Posts: 42,497
|
I bet Danny Trejo gets his arm ripped off or something.
|
07-09-2010, 02:46 AM | #91 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
I just got back from this. I enjoyed myself. I thought it was well done for the most part, but it got a tad messy and fell apart in some areas in the final act.
Still, it was a good time and a much more faithful and interesting sequel than any of the other efforts, really. Some thoughts: SPOILER: show |
07-09-2010, 06:33 AM | #92 |
LUV CABBAGE/H8 JEWS
Posts: 42,497
|
Who is the main character in the movie anyway?
|
07-09-2010, 09:05 AM | #93 |
The Sellsword
Posts: 307
|
The main character is Adrian Brody.
I watched this last night- An absolutely sweet film. After watching all the AVP crap I fear the worst, but this is so much like the original in many ways. Its a solid film. Some of the dialogue is total cheese, in an action movie cliché kinda way, but if you can deal with that- You'll have fun. The Yakuza guy in it was the baddest mother fucker. |
07-09-2010, 12:48 PM | #94 |
LUV CABBAGE/H8 JEWS
Posts: 42,497
|
I just can't imagine Adrien Brody as a bad-ass.
Heard he gained 25 pounds of muscle, but still. |
07-09-2010, 01:42 PM | #95 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
|
|
07-09-2010, 08:05 PM | #96 |
dirty irani
Posts: 11,955
|
|
07-09-2010, 08:12 PM | #97 |
TPWW Fire Pro Champ
Posts: 33,992
|
Brody can do anything. Biopic, comedy, classic remake, war flick.
Pick a role, he'll probably nail it down pat. |
07-10-2010, 01:25 AM | #98 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
I think Brody is great. I love how he went from The Pianist, to King Kong, to this though. I feel like King Kong was the appropriate segway
|
07-10-2010, 01:27 AM | #99 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
I know they were trying to get Arnold to reprise his role as Dutch for this, and he was originally a part of the script early on.
I wonder where he would have fit in. If the story was pretty much the same, my guess would be that the Laurence Fishburne role was designed for him. It would have worked. |
07-10-2010, 02:33 AM | #100 |
dirty irani
Posts: 11,955
|
When the film was originally to be made in the 90's Dutch was in the script but then it never wen ahead.
|
07-10-2010, 02:41 AM | #101 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
|
Yes but they were also trying to get him for a small role this time around
|
07-11-2010, 06:15 PM | #104 |
feel the madness
Posts: 11,360
|
Meh, this was okay.
|
07-11-2010, 07:14 PM | #105 | |
TPWW Fire Pro Champ
Posts: 33,992
|
Quote:
That's how I would have done it. |
|
07-14-2010, 07:47 AM | #106 | |
Posts: 1,398
|
Quote:
SPOILER: show |
|
09-29-2010, 06:41 PM | #108 |
LUV CABBAGE/H8 JEWS
Posts: 42,497
|
Adrien Brody's character is hilarious. His voice, his lines.
Give him sunglasses and that's a fuckin' Horatio Caine. |
09-29-2010, 08:51 PM | #109 |
Posts: 10,638
|
His casting was one of only a few things I didn't like about the film.
|
08-24-2012, 06:03 PM | #110 |
Posts: 6,269
|
I saw this film in 2010, loved it, and recently rewatched it, and I have some thoughts:
The two biggest reasons why I enjoyed this film was because first, every human character was so intriguing that they could totally have their own spin-off film that focuses on them which is something I rarely say or type about an entire cast. Second, the alien Predators were not the *only* predators in this film, which I thought was a cool twist. Truly, the title of this film could be applied to both the alien characters AND the human characters. For the most part, I love and appreciate the villains in films more then the heroes and I think the villains are more entertaining. Reasons being is because villains are totally unpredictable! You never know what they are going to say or do next. And because most villains are selfish characters, they will do ANYTHING to accomplish whatever their goal is, and not care what it takes. So when you have a film with a bunch of very well written villains together, played by good actors, mixed in with cool anti-hero characters who are also well written and wonderfully acted, it's bound to be an entertaining and fun film. |
08-25-2012, 06:50 AM | #111 |
Posts: 1,290
|
I liked it in 2010, thought it was okay.
Rewatched it recently and I thought it was a pretty badly made film. At no point do I really care for any of the characters, mostly just stock fodder with bad dialogue. It's just a rehashing of the first film, right down to the same score. Predator 2 is a masterpiece in comparison. |
08-25-2012, 07:12 AM | #112 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
Reusing the score was deliberate, and sort of normal.
|
08-25-2012, 01:24 PM | #113 |
Posts: 6,269
|
And see, some people's dislike for the characters is what makes it appealing to me. Because all the characters are either villains or anti-heroes, some viewers who love heroes are going to be uneasy because there is not going to be any characters that they can relate to, or vicariously live through, and they are just going to feel miserable and uneasy and will feel stuck with who they will think are unlikeable, unpredictable and violent people.
Truly, there are no good guys in this film. i.e. No characters with morals. It's just a group of violent, crazy, and selfish human predators working together and trying to escape from alien predators. This is one of those types of films that would really suck to be trapped in! Think HBO's "Oz" meets "Predator". I didn't really care for Predator 2. I feel it was only made because the first one had a made a lot of money, so the studio quickly rushed to make a sequel, and just whipped something up, knowing just the words "Predator 2" on a movie poster would attract a crowd. Predator 2 just doesn't have that "Do you ever get the feeling you're being watched?" vibe that both the original "Predator" and "Predators" has. Also, one of the appeals of both "Predator" and "Predators" is that the humans were on the Predator's turf, which added to the horror, whereas "Predator 2" took place on human turf, which took the horror away some in my view because we the viewers feel like we are on safe ground, and just knowing all it would take is the U.S. army to kill the Predator makes me feel a bit too comfortable as I watch "Predator 2" and what makes a scary film scary is I prefer to feel all on edge and uneasy. Here's a parable I just came up with to describe why I love "Predators" - I never go deer hunting because I feel deers are helpless and innocent creatures, and stand no chance against those who hunt them so I would feel bad killing a deer. However, if I had the proper training, I would MAYBE be open to the idea of hunting bears, tigers, wolves, crocodiles, snakes, rhinoceros, cape buffalo's and other dangerous animals who also hunt and kill other animals and humans. Why would I be maybe open to hunting these animals? Because I know they are dangerous and would not think twice about hunting me, killing me and maybe eating me afterwards. Hunting those types of animals is a true sport because when you do that, those animals are not the only ones who's lives are at risk. Yours is true. i.e. If you hunt those types of animals, you are also being hunted by them. That is essentially what "Predators" is about - It's human predators going up against alien predators. |
08-25-2012, 03:31 PM | #114 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
While I too love the movie, I can promise people's issues with the characters and dialogue have nothing to with them being 'anti-heroes' or whatever "people want purity" shit you're pushing. The trend of recent action heroes shows that people very much lean toward dark shit these days, which is kinda annoying, and why I find Avengers (and Captain America in particular) so refreshing.
|
08-25-2012, 04:29 PM | #115 |
Posts: 6,269
|
It's just odd that some people would love "Predator", but not "Predators" when the overall theme of both films is very much alike. That theme being the Predator only kills creatures that it knows are just as dangerous as itself, which is exactly why the Predator never killed Anna in the first film because she had no weapon and as Dutch said to her, there was "no sport" in killing her, (much like to me there is no sport in killing a helpless deer, but there is sport in killing a dangerous bear)
There is still a big difference between the two films and that difference being that the main group of characters in "Predator" were all heroes. They may have been ultra-bad-asses, but they were all unselfish people who worked together and looked out for one another. The characters in "Predators" were the opposite. The development of morality is something that is completely necessary for societies to function. The fact is, every single person out there is dependent on thousands of other people for the products and services and things that we rely upon every single day. At the beginning of civilization, it started off with small groups such as tribes taking care of each other and it slowly coalesced and turned into a nation. If we didn't band together that way, the human race wouldn't have survived. In the case with the human characters in "Predators", they only worked together for that very reason I stated above. i.e. They only helped each other only when they had to, and were really helping each other for their own selfish means, but anyone one of them would have been happy to kill the other to gain an advantage or if they became a parasite. I mean, Adrien Brody's character "Royce" is suppose to be the "hero" of the film and twice, he uses his fellow humans as bait. Dutch would never do something like that. When Poncho hurt himself, Dutch helped him. Royce would have left him, or used him to lure the Predators. The fact that Royce is suppose to be the head "good guy" and would do something like tells you what kind of people the characters all are. Royce was just the lesser of many evil's, and the other characters were so violent and crazy, Royce just seems like a good guy, but in any other film, he'd be a villain. He's just a little bit like Paul Reiser's character "Carter Burke" in "Aliens" with the way he just leaves people in trouble or uses them. But again, the fact that all these characters in "Predator" are bad people is what makes it entertaining and different. Here's another example to describe the film - Even though I love some super hero films, going into them, I pretty much subconsciously know the super hero is going to win in the end, and that's cool, but whenever I watch films such as "Freddy vs. Jason, "The Devil's Rejects", or "Predators", because almost all the characters are either villains or anti-heroes, I pretty much don't know who's going to win or what crazy things the characters are going to do in order to win and that unpredictability and suspense is apart of the appeal. I understand though why some people wouldn't enjoy that type of stress in a film and didn't like that a Predator film went down that route since the other ones never did, and would prefer a classic "good vs. evil" film and kinda depend on that subconscious and comfortable reminder that no matter how bad things are in a film, the main hero is a guy we like and he is going to take care of things in the end. But with a film such as "Predators", you're not going to have that warm and fuzzy feeling. And some people will love that, but others will hate it. I personally think it was a good idea that they did something different instead of rehashing that same old thing where the Predator comes in, kills everyone, but then the hero stops it and we all live happily ever after again. |
08-25-2012, 05:31 PM | #116 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
People are people dude.
|
08-25-2012, 05:39 PM | #117 |
Posts: 6,269
|
Meaning?
|
08-25-2012, 06:26 PM | #118 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
|
They're gonna dig things you don't. Crazy coming from me but an essay isn't worth it.
|
08-25-2012, 07:23 PM | #119 |
Posts: 6,269
|
I know, and I understand. I just (clearly) enjoy deep thoughts and chats, and there is a film forum I go on to do just that.
|
08-25-2012, 08:16 PM | #120 |
Posts: 6,727
|
The success of the first predator has little to do with character and nothing to do with themes or what you are describing as themes. Predator's success was largely filmic, particularly the way it created suspense. A lot of that suspense came from how little we knew about the Predator.
Predators had nothing in terms of suspense, it's a hard thing to duplicate especially in the hands of another filmmaker. Instead it was a fanfic level script and a bunch of unmemorable action sequences. Personally I see Predator sequels as necessary as the Jaws sequels. |