01-22-2015, 03:31 PM | #41 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
...In that case you could still have Brock vs Bryan at WM....
Royce Gracie used to beat big guys in UFC. |
01-22-2015, 03:42 PM | #42 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,896
|
I would love to see Brock/Bryan for the title but will still be intrigued if its just a non title match.
I do think Brock should "make" someone when he loses the title, with him being the streak breaker and dominating Cena at SummerSlam. I really don't see anyone who is ready to beat Brock yet though. |
01-22-2015, 03:42 PM | #43 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,860
|
Would have been down for a Shield triple threat, but Ambrose has been booked so weakly that he doesn't really seem to fit in with the main event picture anymore.
|
01-22-2015, 03:58 PM | #44 |
king of sucks
Posts: 4,412
|
rember orton could come in and win it
|
01-22-2015, 07:58 PM | #45 | |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
Quote:
The ultimate underdog vs the ultimate obstacle is the best story out of all the options available, imo. |
|
01-22-2015, 08:02 PM | #46 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
Honestly though, I have never understood that viewpoint. On the list of unrealistic shit in wrestling, a small guy beating a big guy seems like it would be really tame compared to everything else.
|
01-22-2015, 08:04 PM | #47 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
|
I wonder if he felt the same way when Michaels beat Vader. Or when Taz beat Bam Bam. Or Bret over Yoko. Or any of the billion times in wrestling history that a little guy beat the monster.
|
01-22-2015, 08:22 PM | #48 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
I mean it would be one thing if Bryan was overpowering Lesnar, and winning tests of strength and shit. But that obviously wouldn't happen. They're both good enough workers that they could find a way to make it work just like when Eddie beat Brock.
Which was a fucking awesome match, btw. |
01-22-2015, 08:41 PM | #49 | |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
|
Quote:
I'd go with Roman Reigns winning the rumble as the worst possible scenario. The guy simply isn't ready to main-event right now and I think the WWE would be 'throwing him to the wolves' if they went this route. Daniel Bryan winning for a second straight year would be nice, but he's a health risk right now and so I'm not sure if the WWE goes this route. Ambrose, Ziggler, and Cesaro would have been great choices had they been made to look more credible over this past year, but things turned out differently (Ambrose's push actually was pretty good from what I understand, but he was made to look continuously inferior to Wyatt and Rollins). Perhaps the WWE's best play would be in having a face Randy Orton winning the rumble and then facing Rollins at Mania'. Capitalize on Orton's return face pop, and then launch him to the top again. |
|
01-22-2015, 09:02 PM | #50 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
Ziggler would have been my choice, if they had built off his Survivor Series victory, but instead he's just kind of been there.
|
01-22-2015, 09:07 PM | #51 | |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
|
Quote:
I'll agree with this. However - if we can go back to the RAW after last year's Wrestlemania and do it all over again, then my choice would have been Cesaro. Have him keep Swagger's theme music, have him stay face, have him keep doing that airplane move, and slowly build him up. How the WWE missed this golden opportunity is beyond me. I also think the WWE should have milked the Shield/Wyatt rivalry for a lot longer. After destroying Evolution, Shield/Wyatt should have feuded for a few months a la Nation/DX 1998. |
|
01-22-2015, 09:21 PM | #52 | |
MVP Mark
Posts: 16,447
|
Quote:
I can't really see a Orton and Brock program being that good but this would probably be the best way to go if Orton wins. Orton vs Rollins does not scream main event and no one wants another Orton vs Cena feud again. |
|
01-22-2015, 09:26 PM | #53 | |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
|
Quote:
This would be my #1 choice as well, but I'm just not completely sold on Bryan's health. What happens if he gets injured again between Royal Rumble and Wrestlemania? Although I guess you could make that argument for ANY wrestler (i.e. "what if they get injured"). Bryan vs. Lesnar would be great, but I can't help but wonder if Bryan is on borrowed time as far as his injuries go. It might be better to invest in someone else to get a win over Lesnar at Mania (i.e. Orton). |
|
01-22-2015, 09:31 PM | #54 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
Fandango vs Lesnar. Do it.
|
01-22-2015, 09:33 PM | #55 |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
|
|
01-22-2015, 09:34 PM | #56 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
I went through a nostalgic "I love Todd Pettengill" phase. I guess I could bring him back.
|
01-22-2015, 09:35 PM | #57 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
Todd Pettengill vs Brock Lesnar. Do it.
|
01-22-2015, 10:41 PM | #58 | |
3 Dicks Out For Trips
Posts: 29,658
|
Quote:
I don't group all big men together; theres ones like Lesnar and Lashley who are ripped up freaks, then theres 'giants' like Big Show, Andre, Kevin Nash, then there is a group for people like Yoko and Earthquake and Viscera, etc. Too many differences in size and build to just say big man for all of them. Also, I didn't used to feel like this; several years ago when they had Rey Mysterio going over Big Show things changed. I saw that and was like no.....just no. It kind of brought me back to my days being a WCW mark and there being legit divisions for different size guys. Daniel Bryan would have been amazing in the cruiser division. |
|
01-22-2015, 11:51 PM | #59 |
Taller than Adam Cole
Posts: 10,873
|
Look up Dream 9's SuperHulk Tournament. In particular, Minowa vs. Bob Sapp.
|
01-22-2015, 11:52 PM | #60 |
Taller than Adam Cole
Posts: 10,873
|
Jey and Jimmy Uso draw numbers one and two. They enter the ring, have a stare down, then take turns having fans chant "Sooooooooooo" at each side of the ring for 90 seconds.
|
01-23-2015, 06:23 AM | #61 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
I actually feel like the need for realism is what's making wrestling worse. Sure a guy like Daniel Bryan could beat a guy like Brock Lesnar in real life. I don't care. I don't give a fuck about real life when I'm watching wrestling. If I did, I'd watch UFC. If Daniel Bryan was the size he is but had a larger than life character, then I'd be all for him as the main guy. As it stands, there's too much "regular joe" stuff going on and it's getting too far into "fake version of UFC" territory. There's a reason Bob Backlund needed to go and Hogan needed to come in. Wrestling as a legitimate sport was dead. It's still dead. It's not coming back. They need to stop trying.
|
01-23-2015, 08:42 AM | #62 |
Posts: 357
|
|
01-23-2015, 08:49 AM | #63 | |
Posts: 357
|
Quote:
In any case I am quite certain Sting v Triple H (with the stipulation of total control of the WWE) is going to close out the show given at how much would be riding on the match and the fact it would generate a huge amount of buzz being Sting's WWE in-ring and WM debut and perhaps finale. Furthermore I feel winning the Royal Rumble and the title match at WM has lost it's shine with the exception of WM 29 and WM 30. In recent times the focus has been on big draw matches like Rock v Cena 1, Rock v Hogan and post WM 22, the streak. The title match seemed to be a sideshow and as last year proved, you don't have to even be in the Royal Rumble match to get the opportunity to headline and win the title. |
|
01-23-2015, 02:04 PM | #64 |
Celestia's Left Hand
Posts: 17,359
|
As far as believability unlike Rey Bryan has a style that could compete with Brock his frenzied offense and ground game would be a nice complement to Brock raw power scary speed and wrestling background ....I really wanna see that match I need to see it.
|
01-23-2015, 02:09 PM | #65 |
Do Unto Others...
Posts: 2,086
|
This is going to be a very unpopular statement, but I really think the worst thing is Rollins winning the title. It just automatically devalues what could be the big title match at Mania, and they don't make Seth a star in the process, because he has to lose it two months later, and then the company is left with no heels. Worst for Mania, worst for the long run, and possibly worst for Seth.
|
01-23-2015, 02:34 PM | #66 | |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
|
Quote:
Very interesting post, and I agree with what you're saying. |
|
01-23-2015, 02:47 PM | #67 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
|
The money is definitely in the unbeatable monster who ended The Streak being dethroned as champion and driven from the company at Mania. Anybody other than Lesnar carrying gold into WM31 is a mistake.
|
01-23-2015, 02:49 PM | #68 | |
Posts: 357
|
Quote:
I don't see Lesnar being given the distinction of a title match at WM, certainly not the main event given that he will be leaving shortly and it would a little stupid to have him lose the title in his final match and then disappear afterwards without some sort of rematch story etc. I'm perhaps hopeful/clutching at straws for Taker v Lesnar 2 maybe with the stipulation that the lose "leaves the WWE for good" hence tying in with Lesnar's departure. Perhaps a submission match or buried alive match or casket match? |
|
01-23-2015, 03:04 PM | #69 |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
|
|
01-23-2015, 05:45 PM | #70 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
I could see them pulling a bit of a "swerve" by having Lesnar retain at Mania. Everybody will expect him to lose the title at Mania should be be carrying it in. Lesnar would retain to the shock of everybody, sign an extension taking him to Raw the following night where he drops the belt either via MITB or in a rematch against his Mania opponent.
|
01-24-2015, 01:19 AM | #71 | |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
|
Quote:
Wouldn't be a bad idea, in terms of not being predictable, but I think the WWE needs to have their guy go over Lesnar at Wrestlemania, so that the significance of the moment is amplified. |
|
01-24-2015, 02:07 AM | #72 |
Posts: 3,664
|
Anyone think Orton could win the RR and Seth wins the belt?
|
01-24-2015, 02:09 AM | #73 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
No. But it would be... interesting.
|
01-24-2015, 04:20 AM | #74 |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
|
Heel Seth Rollins defeating Face Brock Lesnar at Wrestlemania.
Wondering if a face Brock Lesnar vs. heel Seth Rollins at mania' could work?
Think about it - Seth Rollins is up there with Roman Reigns and Daniel Bryan in terms of the WWE wanting someone to be "the guy." With Reigns still a bit green, and with Bryan's health a question mark, why shouldn't the WWE give the nod to Seth Rollins? Have Rollins pin Cena at the RR (authority takes out Lesnar). Lesnar gets pissed, enters the rumble, and then wins/dominates the rumble. At Wrestlemania, Seth Rollins gets the surprising clean victory over Lesnar. Rollins doesn't even win in a cowardly way. Heel Rollins CLEANLY defeats Lesnar. How much credibility would Rollins have at THAT point? This then lines up guys like Bryan, Cena, Reigns, and Orton to go after Rollins for future feuds. |
01-24-2015, 06:41 AM | #75 |
DIY MS FILMWORKS
Posts: 1,039
|
Rajah is still around? I thought that place died in the mid 2000s. But that isn't the forum I am talking about. I was talking about the Craphole. Where from Summerslam 2013 until Wrestlemania in 2014 almost every thread was people bitching about Bryan being "buried".
|
01-24-2015, 07:15 AM | #76 | |
Celestia's Left Hand
Posts: 17,359
|
Quote:
that's hilarious |
|
01-24-2015, 07:31 AM | #77 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
|
No, it wasn't part of a grander plot. If it wasn't for the complainers they would have gone with Batista and Randy Orton.
FACT. /Tyson Kidd. |
01-24-2015, 08:53 AM | #78 |
King of Love and Piss
Posts: 62,988
|
Undertaker pulls his pants down and reveals a red afro on his balls.
|
01-24-2015, 11:56 AM | #79 |
king of sucks
Posts: 4,412
|
|
01-24-2015, 01:20 PM | #80 |
Re-Branded
Posts: 3,992
|
Hulkamania ran wild for 9 years. Austin and The Rock carried 'Mania for several years, as have Cena and HHH. Don't give me this 12 year old kid deja vu bullshit about Daniel Bryan for 2 consecutive years. The best stories, characters and personalities carry WM, and Bryan ' s pops and "overness" are genuine and legitimate... therefore not to be dismissed and ignored. I'm not even a huge backer of DBry, but it's just common sense.
|