View Full Version : Fuck Matt Morgan sucks balls
The Naitch
11-18-2010, 11:08 PM
Can't stand him. The way he talks. The way he looks. Generic big man. He even tried to copy Brock by wiping Flairs' blood across his chest. Straight up garbage :n:
Fuck off XL, I did my research on Matt Morgan. I still think he sucks balls :lol:
Anybody Thrilla
11-18-2010, 11:10 PM
I haven't seen a ton of his work, but I think he's pretty decent. Not enough to get me to watch TNA again or anything, but he's got a tool or two.
Jeritron
11-18-2010, 11:12 PM
He's better than most generic big men. I think someone like Ezekial Jackson or Vladmir Kozlov is far less interesting than a Matt Morgan, but he's also no Brock.
St. Jimmy
11-18-2010, 11:59 PM
He eats dicks. Horsedicks.
Wishbone
11-19-2010, 12:01 AM
as Jeritron said he's no Brock but then again no one ever said he was supposed to be and as far as his look and skills I'd say he's far better than most guys in his catagory I mean look at Kozlov, Khali, Big Zeek, and the like I mean seriously sure he's not the greatest thing ever but there's a whole bunch of people who suck more than him.
weather vane
11-19-2010, 12:21 AM
He's better than most generic big men. I think someone like Ezekial Jackson or Vladmir Kozlov is far less interesting than a Matt Morgan, but he's also no Brock.
He eats dicks. Horsedicks.
Why do you even post in the wrestling forum?
Hes good, but TNA push him through ridiculous ways like that whole concussion drama. It was such a lame storyline and I felt sorry for him.
thedamndest
11-19-2010, 12:56 PM
It's more impressive to wrestle Flair and have him not bleed.
St. Jimmy
11-19-2010, 02:32 PM
Why do you even post in the wrestling forum?
Because I watch the product and like to place my input on it. Don't be such a negative nancy, you know you love me. :love:
erickman
11-19-2010, 02:33 PM
he was great as a heel, i saw him in a house show and he had the most heat of the night the jury is still out on him being a face.
Dave Youell
11-20-2010, 03:45 PM
Morgan for me, is pretty decent. One of the best talkers for a 'Big Man' in great shape for a big man, pretty charismatic.
He's not incredible, but I enjoy his work.
He's better than most generic big men. I think someone like Ezekial Jackson or Vladmir Kozlov is far less interesting than a Matt Morgan, but he's also no Brock.
Kane Knight
11-20-2010, 06:28 PM
He has the best workrate in the business.
Dave Youell
11-20-2010, 06:30 PM
What an odd statement...
Aguakate
11-21-2010, 03:32 PM
Matt Morgan is a classic example of a guy who if it wasn't because he is in TNA, and they'll push pretty much anybody, wouldn't even be on a Main Event. Certainly not in WWE.
Nightwing
11-22-2010, 12:49 PM
Pics or it didnt happen.
Although Chris Masters lost, I like the fact that he's getting some sort of airtime again. Plus he's on Team Mysterio, which helps. I kind of have a soft spot for Masters and I think he deserves some recognition, since he's always been a jobber to the stars
*jiggles pectoral muscles*
So...you can't stand Morgan but you like Masters? Okaaaaaaaaaaaaay.
captaincharismark
11-24-2010, 10:40 PM
Morgan is definately more talented than any of the current "generic" big men in WWE now. And unlike Khali, Zeke, or Kozlov, Morgan can actually wrestle a 20 minute match and string together an intelligable promo. He's no Brock, but then if that's your main beef, that is very flawed to judge his skill on...
Tbf, Morgan is much better on the mic than Brock ever was.
Volare
11-25-2010, 10:16 AM
He has the best workrate in the business.
C'mon now KK, we all know there's no such thing as "workrate."
The Pope
11-25-2010, 11:39 AM
Tbf, Morgan is much better on the mic than Brock ever was.
Did Brock ever even touch a mic in the WWE?
Yeah, when he was friends with Angle in 2003 just before he turned heel. He was pretty bad.
The Pope
11-25-2010, 11:44 AM
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yp1dLz3xPbE?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yp1dLz3xPbE?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Did Brock ever even touch a mic in the WWE?
Yes.
Would hardly say he was better than Brock on the mic, he does nothing distinguishable whatsoever. Was generic and as 'standard' as ever on Impact last week. Maybe the only reason he stands out to some people is because of his position in TNA, who will start to push any big guy that can string 2 steps together (and sometimes ones that can't like Rob Terry). I doubt he'd stand out any more than Zeke, Kozlov etc if he was back in Vinceland. I've seen nothing from him that proves otherwise anyways.
Dunno bout that. I've been pretty big on the guy for a while and he moved up to his "position" about 3 weeks ago. I also think you're underselling his mic skills (when compared to Brock, who was damn awful).
DInsaneOne
11-25-2010, 12:26 PM
Matt Morgan is pretty good on the mic, he is a decent character, that has potential to go places if used right.
He just never really holds your attention for long periods....if ric flair is really working with him alot behind the scenes, perhaps it will help him find his perfect role.
Im just neutral on him overall.
Kane Knight
11-25-2010, 02:04 PM
C'mon now KK, we all know there's no such thing as "workrate."
but Auntie Em, it is real! Like the smark's impact on the business and CM Punk outpopping DX!
And you were there, and you and even you, John cena!
Kane Knight
11-25-2010, 03:28 PM
But Punk did outpop DX.
Exactly. and the internet controls wrestling, and workrate is a real measure.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.