Star Trek: Into Darkness

[Fignuts]

http://l.yimg.com/os/251/2012/12/03/startrek2poster-jpg_155636.jpg


BAM

[Schlomey]

I am more excited for this movie than anything coming up in 2013.


Anyone else see Dark Knight movie poster in this?

[Kane Knight]

I am more excited for this movie than anything coming up in 2013.


Anyone else see Dark Knight movie poster in this?

Just about every commentary so far has.

[Schlomey]

Well this is my first time seeing the poster. Didn't think I'd be alone in that.

[DLVH84]

I am more excited for this movie than anything coming up in 2013.


Anyone else see Dark Knight movie poster in this?

It's pretty damn obvious.

[Lock Jaw]

Captain Kirk Rises



Anyways.... I am glad this is finally coming. Seems like it has been way too long.

[Kane Knight]

The Kirk Knight Rises

[Kane Knight]

It's pretty damn obvious.

The similarities are pretty generic, really.

[JimmyMess]

Either way it's still a pretty epic poster. I'd love to see what other movies new or old would look like with this style of poster. Could be some pretty great/funny/epic ones.

I'm getting off topic.

I'm excited for this movie.

[Adder]

Is there anything anywhere mentioning the plot/story outline?

[Kalyx triaD]

The title is actually "Star Trek Into Darkness", with no subtitle.

[Hanso Amore]

Star Trek Faggots

[Schlomey]

Star Trek Faggots

I grew up watching The Next Generation but I was simply a casual fan. The movie released in 2009 really peaked my interest and now I am watching everything that Netflix has to offer. I am slowly becoming a Trekkie. Not so much the faggot part unless that is Klingon for super awesome guy. :cool:

[Kane Knight]

The title is actually "Star Trek Into Darkness", with no subtitle.

Nobody cares.

I grew up watching The Next Generation but I was simply a casual fan. The movie released in 2009 really peaked my interest and now I am watching everything that Netflix has to offer. I am slowly becoming a Trekkie. Not so much the faggot part unless that is Klingon for super awesome guy. :cool:

Well, you will become a faggot.

It's part of the conversion process.

I can take or leave most of Star Trek, but I kind of grew up on the movies, so they have a certain level of sentimental value to me.

[RoXer]

I said in some other thread that I can't find a long time ago about who I would want to write/direct a new Star Wars trilogy. This was before the announcement obviously. I figured this would take place 15-20 years from now. I would have liked Abrams to direct, Lindelof, Orci, and Kurtzman to have a hand in the writing, and Michael Giachinno to replace the probably dead John Williams.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_into_Darkness
Star Trek into Darkness

Directed by:
-J. J. Abrams

Written by:
-Alex Kurtzman
-Damon Lindelof
-Roberto Orci

Music by:
-Michael Giacchino

... and they both have the word "Star" in the title.

... and they're both about space.

Eh, close enough.

[Tb1]

HOW DARE YOU START THIS THREAD

[Tb1]

<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/diP-o_JxysA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BAM SUCK IT BOOM FUCK

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

Gary Mitchell? Khan? Trelane? Garth of Izar? I think it's Garth Of Izar.

[Tb1]

Gary Mitchell, with the Starfleet uniform and all. Also, FUCK SHIT LORDY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Fignuts]

So is it Khan? Sounds like Khan.

[El Vaquero de Infierno]

Benedict Cumberbatch = awesomeness

[BigDaddyCool]

where the fuck are the Klingons?

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

So is it Khan? Sounds like Khan.

Why? Khan is Indian not British. Garth of Izar.

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Garth_of_Izar

Makes the most sense. Former Starfleet Fleet Commander who goes nuts and now wants revenge on the system who kicked him out. He fits the tone of the poster which echoed the Batman posters. A fallen hero like Harvey Dent. Garth trying to destroy what he helped built: Starfleet and the Federation.

Gary Mitchell was already dealt with in the canon-tie in comic book to the first movie.

[Kane Knight]

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BrHlQUXFzfw?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Slightly more footage in the Japanese trailer.

[Schlomey]

This looks really awesome.

[Tommy Gunn]

I hope this series goes for longer than a trilogy. The Star Trek universe is so rich, there's almost limitless stories to tell.

Then again, a long running film series with the same cast just doesn't happen anymore.

[XCaliber]

I'd say it looks sick but I really hope it's not Khan and where's The Batman?

[Kane Knight]

I'd say it looks sick but I really hope it's not Khan and where's The Batman?

Benedict is Batman.

Note the way he took down Klingons, despite their superiority.

Only Batman could do that.

[Kane Knight]

Batman would have beat the Kobiyashi Maru scenario without cheating.

[XCaliber]

After watching this a few times I couldn't help but notice there's no Checkov yet everyone else is featured including Alicia Eve who's likely to be going by her uniform is Nurse Christine Chapel hmmmm.

[XCaliber]

Then again it could be Elizabeth Dehner which supports that Benedict Cumerbatch is playing Gary Mitchell but then again the Japanese Trailer has a scene that parallels a bit Wrath of Khan too fascinating.

[Kane Knight]

After watching this a few times I couldn't help but notice there's no Checkov yet everyone else is featured including Alicia Eve who's likely to be going by her uniform is Nurse Christine Chapel hmmmm.

There are breakdowns on the web, and I'm surprised none of them I've seen have suggested she was Nurse Chapel. Seemed like a fit.

[Kane Knight]

Batman would have beaten Locutus with ant-Borg Bat-repellent.

[Nowhere Man]

Even if Cumberbatch isn't Khan, that scene with Kirk and Spock putting their hands on the glass is very clearly a callback to Spock's death scene from Wrath of Khan. So it looks like they're at the very least doing some kind of parallel to it.

[The Destroyer]

I really wish I could sound like Benedict Cumberbatch.

[Adder]

Even if Cumberbatch isn't Khan, that scene with Kirk and Spock putting their hands on the glass is very clearly a callback to Spock's death scene from Wrath of Khan. So it looks like they're at the very least doing some kind of parallel to it.
movie #2, Spock dies.

[JimmyMess]

movie #2, Spock dies.

SPOILERS...
http://37prime.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/sp_1608_promo01-480x360.jpg
GAAAWW!;)

[DLVH84]

Hopefully, for the 3rd and 4th one, whoever plays Spock on the new film series, stars and directs, just like Nimoy.

[Kane Knight]

Even if Cumberbatch isn't Khan, that scene with Kirk and Spock putting their hands on the glass is very clearly a callback to Spock's death scene from Wrath of Khan. So it looks like they're at the very least doing some kind of parallel to it.

Or it's a swerve.

I mean, I agree that it looks very much like there will be parallels. I'm just saying that people have predicted Khan to be in this movie since before the first one came out, so maybe they're toying with us on the parallels.

Or maybe it is Khan.

Just saying.

[Kalyx triaD]

...Could be a new villain altogether, or perhaps a mix of two iconic villains. This is an alternate timeline after all.

[DLVH84]

...Could be a new villain altogether, or perhaps a mix of two iconic villains. This is an alternate timeline after all.

Good point.

[Lock Jaw]

Personally I am rooting for someone new. Screw "paying homage" with a "new twist" on an "old villain".

[Kane Knight]

Personally I am rooting for someone new. Screw "paying homage" with a "new twist" on an "old villain".
Screw "originality."

[XCaliber]

It was revealed several months ago by the writers that it would be one of five classic villians that had already been used in TOS and I recall one of them was Gary Mitchell. The only thing is that he was apparently used in the IDW comic which links the 2 films and dies but not sure under what cicumstances though. That would be a good enough reason for him wanting revenge and as for that final clip it appears to be the reverse angle meaning Spock is on the outside looking in.

[Arashi Kage]

My favorite comment that I saw online...

"When the Enterprise is ashes... you have my permission to set phasers to kill."

I'm just hoping that the "bad guy" does not turn out to be Khan. I hope that there is absolutely nothing to do with Khan in this film. The writers and Abrams had a reletively clean slate and could have done anything they wanted for this 2nd film. It would be such a shame to "reboot" or "reimagine" Star Trek II.

From seeing this teaser trailer, I'm happy to believe that this film has nothing to do with Khan, despite some comments online of people still believing that due to dialog in the trailer that this looks like Khan.

The most fundamental piece of evidence, Cumberbatch doesn't seem like he would be an east indian dude named Khan.

[Kane Knight]

The most fundamental piece of evidence, Cumberbatch doesn't seem like he would be an east indian dude named Khan.

I don't know. Sulu's Asian in this one.

[XCaliber]

Also keep in mind that orignally Benicio Del To Ro was originally cast to play the role but ended turning down for some reason probly due to it conflicting with another project he was in.

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

Personally I am rooting for someone new. Screw "paying homage" with a "new twist" on an "old villain".

They had someone new in the last one. They have already said it was a call-back character from TOS.

Him wearing a starfleet uniform could narrow it down to Garth of Izar, Gary Mitchell (Alice Eve could be Denhar, but could be just a red herring and she's Chapel), or maybe Finnegan Kirk's old nemesis/bully from the Academy days, or Finn from Court Martial episode.

I won't consider the final scene from that Japan trailer until it is seen on American screens. Probably means they cut it from the film and they screwed up.

[slik]

Totally came into this thread wandering what Tb1 would think of the trailer.

[YOUR Hero]

...Could be a new villain altogether, or perhaps a mix of two iconic villains. This is an alternate timeline after all.
exactly
but some things are inevitable
like Spock's destiny to die.

...type thing...

[Kane Knight]

Or, apparently, Kirk and Spock becoming friends.

[XCaliber]

So the villain's name is supposedly John Harrison but it's likely just a code name and Alica Eve has been revealed to be playing Carol Marcus might have to go see that nine minute preview so I can get my fix till May.

[Kane Knight]

John Harrison? Why, that's the name of the Tribble Commander!

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

So the villain's name is supposedly John Harrison but it's likely just a code name and Alica Eve has been revealed to be playing Carol Marcus might have to go see that nine minute preview so I can get my fix till May.

Alice Eve playing Carol Marcus doesn't make sense. Kirk would have to be gay to let Alice Eve get away.

[Tb1]

BOOM POW

<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mdgRx94W5ko" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Kane Knight]

Not really more informative than the prior teaser.

[XCaliber]

Not a whole lot it just makes us ask more questions and that is very much typical of Abrams and Lindelof they clearly like to mess with the fanboys.

[El Vaquero de Infierno]

The preview before the Hobbit was better than the whole of that film.

[Mooияakeя™]

Sexy sex sex Star Trek:

<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1x-ATlpqo1M?version=3&amp;hl=en_GB"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1x-ATlpqo1M?version=3&amp;hl=en_GB" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

Damn good bloody good damn good job.

[XCaliber]

Punch it Chewie! :shifty:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yWWr2wE5Myg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[YOUR Hero]

that wasn't a good trailer imo

[Kane Knight]

that wasn't a good trailer imo

Get with the times, old man!

[El Vaquero de Infierno]

Not enough Cumberbatch.

Hero is gay for Cumberbatch, but then again, who isn't?

[Kane Knight]

Women. They tend to be straight for Cumberbatch.

[XCaliber]

Damn this is looking more and more epic.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yhz4A5BCMAA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Tb1]

going to wet myself

[Lock Jaw]

Daaaaaaaaamn

[mitchables]

i dunno i want to be really excited but in the trailer i saw i am pretty sure there was a shot of the enterprise like rising out of an ocean or something and that kind of made me cringe

[Tb1]

Yeah, the only thing that's throwing me off is the lack of space. Like, where is it. Where is space

[Kane Knight]

i dunno i want to be really excited but in the trailer i saw i am pretty sure there was a shot of the enterprise like rising out of an ocean or something and that kind of made me cringe

While I don't dislike the trailers, I have a feeling the crash and rise of the Enterprise from the water were placed in the trailers so audiences would know when to clap like fucking seals.

Besides, a sea liftoff here still looks less terrible than Voyager landing.

[YOUR Hero]

that was a much better trailer

[Tb1]

While I don't dislike the trailers, I have a feeling the crash and rise of the Enterprise from the water were placed in the trailers so audiences would know when to clap like fucking seals.

Besides, a sea liftoff here still looks less terrible than Voyager landing.

The Enterprise coming out of the water happens at a different point in the movie. I saw the 10 minute IMAX preview and they were hiding the Enterprise underwater on some mission so to not break to prime directive. It's been noted on a few sites, but I'm pretty sure that's not the Enterprise that crashes into the bay. Warp nacelles are significantly smaller.

[XCaliber]

The Enterprise coming out of the water happens at a different point in the movie. I saw the 10 minute IMAX preview and they were hiding the Enterprise underwater on some mission so to not break to prime directive. It's been noted on a few sites, but I'm pretty sure that's not the Enterprise that crashes into the bay. Warp nacelles are significantly smaller.

If you quickly pause it at 1:53 as the ship is about to fall into the atmosphere you can easily the registry is NCC-1701 what a pity. :(

[Kane Knight]

The Enterprise coming out of the water happens at a different point in the movie. I saw the 10 minute IMAX preview and they were hiding the Enterprise underwater on some mission so to not break to prime directive. It's been noted on a few sites, but I'm pretty sure that's not the Enterprise that crashes into the bay. Warp nacelles are significantly smaller.

As Xcaliber pointed out, it's definitely the Enterprise that crashes. At least, it's what's shot down. I don't know about the nacelles being smaller either. They look the right size to me, though I don't have any precise nacelle-measuring technique.

I did presume the water liftoff was from the same circumstances because of the bitching that everything happens on Earth and there's no space or whatever. If that's not the case, that's not the case. But the Enterprise does appear to be going down at some point in this movie.

[mitchables]

my complaint with the water lift-off isn't even that it's not in space, it's just a fucking stupid idea

also i don't really need to see the enterprise crash again, y'know. about the only redeeming thing in all of generations was the saucer crash so

[Kane Knight]

my complaint with the water lift-off isn't even that it's not in space, it's just a fucking stupid idea

Sweetie, we weren't talking about you:

Yeah, the only thing that's throwing me off is the lack of space. Like, where is it. Where is space

[Kane Knight]

I've seen similar comments elsewhere, for the record.

[mitchables]

no i know you weren't talking about me but i was just saying that my issue with it wasn't that

kind of like "i agree, but not for the same reasons"

or whatever

it doesn't matter, the point is: it's stupid and i don't want to see the enterprise crash again :-\

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

my complaint with the water lift-off isn't even that it's not in space, it's just a fucking stupid idea

also i don't really need to see the enterprise crash again, y'know. about the only redeeming thing in all of generations was the saucer crash so

Um?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dWBmaKk32fE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Tb1]

As Xcaliber pointed out, it's definitely the Enterprise that crashes. At least, it's what's shot down. I don't know about the nacelles being smaller either. They look the right size to me, though I don't have any precise nacelle-measuring technique.

I did presume the water liftoff was from the same circumstances because of the bitching that everything happens on Earth and there's no space or whatever. If that's not the case, that's not the case. But the Enterprise does appear to be going down at some point in this movie.

alright, here's me unnecessarily dissecting a scene from a movie that hasn't come out yet

OK

"new" enterprise

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/MadMan1701A/Wallpapers/StillBoldy_MadUniverse_HD.jpg

notice how close, and large, the necelles on the new Enterprise are in comparison to the smaller, and further apart nacelles of the one on the left. Now, I'm not denying that's a shot of the Enterprise falling to Earth, it certainly is. Just judging from the few shots I've seen, it doesn't look like the Enterprise. See nacelles:

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y231/bodaciousbob2755/proof1_zps830cf288.png

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y231/bodaciousbob2755/proof2_zps45340108.png

in comparison to

http://trekazoid.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/tlw_enterprise_new_b.jpg

check out those tiny nacelles that are years apart in comparison to those big, close honkers of the Enterprise.

IN MY OPINION BOYS, not the Enterprise

[Tb1]

Fu Mallards

[Tb1]

:heart:

[Tb1]

alright, here's me unnecessarily dissecting a scene from a movie that hasn't come out yet

OK

"new" enterprise

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/MadMan1701A/Wallpapers/StillBoldy_MadUniverse_HD.jpg

notice how close, and large, the necelles on the new Enterprise are in comparison to the smaller, and further apart nacelles of the one on the left. Now, I'm not denying that's a shot of the Enterprise falling to Earth, it certainly is. Just judging from the few shots I've seen, it doesn't look like the Enterprise. See nacelles:

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y231/bodaciousbob2755/proof1_zps830cf288.png

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y231/bodaciousbob2755/proof2_zps45340108.png

in comparison to

http://trekazoid.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/tlw_enterprise_new_b.jpg

check out those tiny nacelles that are years apart in comparison to those big, close honkers of the Enterprise.

IN MY OPINION BOYS, not the Enterprise

For the new page

[Kane Knight]

Remember when the monster from Cloverfield took the head off the statue of liberty and people laughed because it was like, four feet tall?

Look, the Enterprise already looks quite different depending on the viewing angle. You can argue that the Enterprise isn't the one crashing, and there's no way to defintively prove you wrong, but I am curious as to what end this would serve, considering the shots of a damaged Enterprise going down and ejecting escape pods.

Incidentally, a quick google search indicates people believe the ship rising is not the Enterprise for similar reasons, though you say yourself it is, from another point in the movie. There could be any number of reasons for inconsistencies, from placeholder graphics to design failure.

I mean, from the appearance of the crash frames, that ship looks kind of transparent.

TIS A GHOST SHIP LADS, TIS MY OPINION.

[XCaliber]

The ship rising from the water is the Enterprise which had been hiding while on a mission on another planet this was revealed long ago.

Now i'd say there's reasonable doubt that it may not be Enterprise as the warp nacelles appear less bulky although that could be due to atmospheric burn off. Upon closer review I noticed that even the pitch of the arms that support them appear further apart plus the deflector portion seems to be almost compressed. Going by the footage it's hard to determine if Harrison is controlling another Starship could he possible have stolen an older model somehow? He certainly seemed to have a lot of followers so it wouldn't be a stretch by any means and given his occupation it's possible he already had special access. If the segments are completely unrelated then I would go as far to say that first part we see is from Kirk having a nightmare cuz afterall we all know it's his ship and crew.

[JimmyMess]

the ship crashing is most definitely the Enterprise.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U_IWKaoN6hg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Tb1]

Based on what JimmyMess

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

It's clearly a red herring. Showing the Enterprise is a crippled state and then showing another ship crashing. There's no evidence to suggest its "Khan/Gary Mitchell/Ben Finney/Finnegan's" ship or the Enterprise. Although it's probably the bad guy's ship.

[JimmyMess]

Based on what JimmyMess

The ship is on fire and falling into the atmosphere before the shot of the ship crashing into the ocean in that trailer.

It could be a red herring as STD said... but I highly doubt it.... they blow up Enterprise ships all the time haha.

[Tb1]

Will pay everyone in this thread $20 if it's the Enterprise

[Lock Jaw]

Cool.

[Tb1]

There was a new sneak peak yesterday.

http://scifanatic.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/stid-mtvclip-1.jpg

http://scifanatic.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/stid-mtvclip-3.jpg

http://trekmovie.com/2013/04/15/mtv-star-trek-into-darkness-clip-gives-best-glimpse-yet-of-the-other-starship/

[Corporate CockSnogger]

Just posting to potentially earn $20 from Mr Croatia

[Tb1]

Looks like I'm keeping my buckaroonis if those .jpgs are any indication

[Tb1]

THE NACELLES BOYS, THE NACELLES

[loopydate]

Just posting to potentially earn $20 from Mr Croatia

[Tb1]

Final domestic trailer.

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2nRI4fftGB4?list=FLmepNnYN40Yf7Cxnh5cX_Ag" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[El Vaquero de Infierno]

Looking darn tasty. I think it is the only film I am looking forward to this year, except maybe the Great Gatsby. But other than that, nothing else is interesting me.

[XCaliber]

JJJJJOOOOOHHHHHNNNNN!

[Mooияakeя™]

♥

[RoXer]

I want $20

[Miotch]

Just posting to potentially earn $20 from Mr Croatia

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

20 bucks? how?

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

There was a new sneak peak yesterday.

http://scifanatic.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/stid-mtvclip-1.jpg

http://scifanatic.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/stid-mtvclip-3.jpg

http://trekmovie.com/2013/04/15/mtv-star-trek-into-darkness-clip-gives-best-glimpse-yet-of-the-other-starship/

Looks more like the crappy NX enterprise from the tv series of same name.

Although that would mean its an Enterprise. Money Money Money Money Money!

[Kane Knight]

Final domestic trailer.

<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2nRI4fftGB4?list=FLmepNnYN40Yf7Cxnh5cX_Ag" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="480" width="853"></iframe>

In which Bennedict Cumberbatch proudly proclaims, "mine's bigger."

[Kane Knight]

Looks more like the crappy NX enterprise from the tv series of same name.

Although that would mean its an Enterprise. Money Money Money Money Money!

It looks like Cumberbatch's ship.

[XCaliber]

If you listen closely the line of narrative where it says "You are a pawn... Kirk." sounds more like an old recording of Ricardo Montalbon voice than Benedict Cumberbatch does anyone else concur?

[YOUR Hero]

Star Trek and Superman. Two of my childhood favourites. Hope they deliver.

[Kane Knight]

Star Trek and Superman. Two of my childhood favourites. Hope they deliver.

Is that why you have the symbol for hope in your avatar?

[Kane Knight]

If you listen closely the line of narrative where it says "You are a pawn... Kirk." sounds more like an old recording of Ricardo Montalbon voice than Benedict Cumberbatch does anyone else concur?

Meh. It sounds a little like Ricardo, but but enough that I'd say more than Englebert Humperdink.

[YOUR Hero]

Is that why you have the symbol for hope in your avatar?
electric hope

[Arashi Kage]

The "bad guy" ship looks like it could be the one crashing into the water, although the ship crashing into the water looks smaller.

http://oyster.ignimgs.com/wordpress/stg.ign.com/2013/05/IMAX-star-trek-into-darkness-enterprise-poster2-610x948.jpg

[Tb1]

Have tickets to 3 different showings so far

[Tb1]

Going to die the day before

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

Meh I might just see it once. It's not really Trek with JJ at the Conn.

[cardsharkrob]

Wanted to let everyone know if you go to the Esurance Facebook page they are having a daily contest and giving away 500 pairs of tickets daily until May 19th to go see Star Trek: Into the Darkness. Its very simple just like their page, enter your name, email address and the security word they show and it will tell you if you won or not. you can enter once a day until you win. I won my tickets already, they give you a code to use on fandango.com and its worth 31 dollars. Good luck all

[Kane Knight]

Have tickets to 3 different showings so far

Why?

[XCaliber]

The "bad guy" ship looks like it could be the one crashing into the water, although the ship crashing into the water looks smaller.

http://oyster.ignimgs.com/wordpress/stg.ign.com/2013/05/IMAX-star-trek-into-darkness-enterprise-poster2-610x948.jpg

This movie seems to going for a record for most posters anyhow the scaling on this one seems rather off when compared to trailers it's more like the size of the mining ship Nero used in the first one.

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

Just won two tickets from some facebook/fandango contest. Woo!

Wanted to let everyone know if you go to the Esurance Facebook page they are having a daily contest and giving away 500 pairs of tickets daily until May 19th to go see Star Trek: Into the Darkness. Its very simple just like their page, enter your name, email address and the security word they show and it will tell you if you won or not. you can enter once a day until you win. I won my tickets already, they give you a code to use on fandango.com and its worth 31 dollars. Good luck all

That's fahhhhhhn dannnnnn gooooo!

[cardsharkrob]

congrats SlickyTrickyDamon.

[Tb1]

Why?

Why not?

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

With just yourself or different people/timing wise?

[Fignuts]

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WPkByAkAdZs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Tb1]

With just yourself or different people/timing wise?

Just myself, I'm sure I'll gather up some people for the showings as the date gets closer. Seeing it Wednesday, Thursday, Friday so far

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

4 hours until showtime!

[cardsharkrob]

Wanted to remind everyone have until Saturday to try to win tickets through the facebook page I posted about earlier.

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

Holy shit. See that fucking movie asap.

[Nowhere Man]

Watched it. Loved it. Reviewed it. (http://bazzardthebazz.blogspot.com/2013/05/movie-review-star-trek-into-darkness.html) Dig it.

[Blitz]

Was good but the ending felt anti-climactic, a bit.

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

Star Trek episodes were often anti-climatic. Adventure over, beam out, warp out credits.

I disagree though.



Having the 5-year mission intro ending was great. Now it sets up what Star Trek is all about. I actually thought that they would have left Khan on Ceti Alpha V or some other planet instead of deep storage.

[El Vaquero de Infierno]

Cumberbatch brought the goodness. And the woman that plays Carol Marcus is rather scrumptious.

[RoXer]

Can I just like have $20?

Still?

[RoXer]

Can someone just send me money please for the hell of it?

[XCaliber]

I'd give it about 4/5 I'm fine with the lack of technobablbe and philosophy but there was some lack of originality and a few plotholes as well that really prevents it from being as great as it's predecessor.

[Adder]

Really liked it.

[SlickyTrickyDamon]

Can I just like have $20?

Still?

No. The ship was the "Reliant" so to speak.

[owenbrown]

bumping this to say just went and saw this and it was fucking great. That is all.