Taker vs. Punk, who is the hero?

[Damndirty]

I love Undertaker as much as the ordinary fan, but the question here is: Who is the hero!?

Punk, of course he is young; but as a heel.

Is Taker the hero for sticking it out once a year or is Punk for the days he is healthy?

I would make this a poll, but this is more significant than what a poll can push a button for.

Do you think Punk should end the streak, despite the fact he is young and could tangle with anybody because of his age or...

is Taker the hero here because he can put at LEAST a year of his career on the line because he is twice the age of Punk.

When you think of this, this match is surely to be one of the greatest in history because of reputations: One era of redemption vs. another!!!!!

[Bad News Gertner]

Taker is and it's not close.

[Rammsteinmad]

Taker's 66?

[Shisen Kopf]

I thought about this all night and the answer is Punk is more hero-y than Mean Mark b/c he doesn't do drugs, or smoke or drink Zima so he's a hero. Undertaker used to ride a motorcycle so that meant he did smack and raped teenage girls. You think that is hero? Shame on you! Also pushing a button rules. This shoulda been a poll dirtydamn

[ron the dial]

General George S. Patton

http://www.navalbasehobbies.com/swords/patton_in_color.jpg

[Dark One]

Urn Anderson.

[Skippord]

John Elway

[Shadrick]

Manbearpig.

[XL]

Gonna have to think about this. Not because it's such a deep question that it needs to considered but because I'm not sure what is being asked here.

[Tazz Dan]

Gonna have to think about this. Not because it's such a deep question that it needs to considered but because I'm not sure what is being asked here.

[Dark One]

Gonna have to think about this. Not because it's such a deep question that it needs to considered but because I'm not sure what is being asked here.

Allow me to translate:

I love Undertaker as much as the ordinary fan, but the question here is: Who is the hero!?

I am quite the supporter of the Undertaker, as any fine chap should be! Alas, I must propose quite the quandary: Who is the exemplary gentleman?

Punk, of course he is young; but as a heel.

Charles Montgomery Punk, Esquire is but a fledgling pup and quite the cantankerous rogue.

Is Taker the hero for sticking it out once a year or is Punk for the days he is healthy?

So I must submit this inquiry to you: is Taker the most honorable man for being present just once per calendar cycle, or would it instead be young Punk Q. Esquire in deference to the lengthy time in which he has spent in our view?

I would make this a poll, but this is more significant than what a poll can push a button for.

Although it may seem most adequate to come to a consensus on this great issue with a tabulation of votes; however, t'would be a disservice for us fine gents to encapsulate this grand debate into a simple mark on a ballot.

Do you think Punk should end the streak, despite the fact he is young and could tangle with anybody because of his age or...

is Taker the hero here because he can put at LEAST a year of his career on the line because he is twice the age of Punk.

In conclusion, do you fine sirs believe that Caesar Maximum Punk should be honored with the distinction of being the first and only heroic figure to overcome the grandiose odds of Undertaker's winning streak? It is an the indisputable truth that he is a youthful gentleman who could easily engage in fisticuffs with any pugilist...

Or shall we deem the man more popularly known as 'Taker' the protagonist as a result of his vast cache of experience over his youthful, brash counterpart?

When you think of this, this match is surely to be one of the greatest in history because of reputations: One era of redemption vs. another!!!!!

Quite certainly, this contest will be one of the most glorious in all of history because of these fine men's legacies!

Sincerely,
Damndirty

Dictated but not read.

[Mr. Nerfect]

CM Punk could come out of this match with a fair bit of credibility. If reports that he is taking time off after WrestleMania are true (and even if he's not injured, it wouldn't hurt to allow your talent extended periods to rest up), he could return with a fair bit of fanfare.

Still hoping for John Cena vs. The Rock vs. CM Punk for Payback in Chicago. That crowd will be unruly. Even if The Rock can't do an appearance in there, could you imagine a darker Cena (probably not a heel, but someone who will do anything to keep the WWE Title and protect his status as the "franchise player" in WWE) facing a returning Punk in his hometown? Punk winning the WWE Title there again could be massive.

[Mr. Nerfect]

I'm also thinking that Taker vs. Punk this year could lead to either Taker vs. Punk II or Austin vs. Punk (depending on how much Taker likes working with Punk). I'm still thinking that an appropriate ending to the match would be Taker's Hell's Gate forcing Punk to pass out, but Punk shows the sheer toughess not to submit -- drawing comparisons to Austin vs. Hart from WrestleMania 13. It could be used to build up Austin and Punk as Yin and Yang for whenever, if ever, they have their dream match.

[Heisenberg]

I hope that when this match goes down, they will have had plenty of time to use the bathroom and won't have to piss and shit in the sink like the undercard wrestlers.

That's my concern.