Log in

View Full Version : WWE or NWA:TNA


Mr. JL
06-24-2004, 08:28 PM
I'd pick NWA: TNA anyday over the current WWE product. What about you?

big_bluto
06-24-2004, 08:29 PM
WWE

Ferocious
06-24-2004, 08:30 PM
Mr JL Blows Goats...........I have proof.

tucsonspeed6
06-24-2004, 08:36 PM
Mr JL blew my goat! My lawyer says that if the goat doesn't stop with the nervous ticks soon it could be labeled as post traumatic stress syndrome and then I can sue the shit out of Mr JL and get my goat the help he really needs.....which is psychological care from the guy who played the dad on "Growing Pains" (he's the only psychiatrist that I know...even if he is a fictional character.)

big_bluto
06-24-2004, 08:38 PM
Mr JL blew my goat! My lawyer says that if the goat doesn't stop with the nervous ticks soon it could be labeled as post traumatic stress syntrome and then I'd can sue the shit out of Mr JL and get my goat the help he really needs.....which is psychological care from the guy who played the dad on "Growing Pains" (he's the only psychiatrist that I know...even if he is a fictional character.)
Ferocious - I think you were right all along about Tucsonspeed6.
Recruit him!!
Recruit HIM! :y: :yes: :yes:

mitch_h
06-24-2004, 08:40 PM
ROH

Oxstar
06-24-2004, 08:45 PM
Hey you forgot to put the B in between JL. Mr.JBL

Ferocious
06-24-2004, 08:50 PM
Hey you forgot to put the B in between JL. Mr.JBL
Worst attempt at humour since Shakespeare died.

big_bluto
06-24-2004, 08:55 PM
Worst attempt at humour since Shakespeare died.
SHAKESPEARS DEAD?!?!?! :nono:







:shifty:

Mr. JL
06-24-2004, 09:38 PM
So now I blow goats? ... thats just great

Mr. JL
06-24-2004, 09:38 PM
AND THEY HAVE PROOF!

big_bluto
06-24-2004, 09:39 PM
So now I blow goats? ... thats just great
NEVER admit to things like that.^^

Mr. JL
06-24-2004, 09:41 PM
NEVER admit to things like that.^^
but it must be true.. its on the internet
and someone on the net has proof

Anybody Thrilla
06-24-2004, 10:27 PM
Anyway, back to that silly topic thing...

WWE by far. I'm not quite sure what it is, maybe just the production value, but NWA:TNA is kinda hard to watch. Sure they have some fairly amazing talent, but so does the WWE. We're just so used to how amazing they are that we forget that they are in fact amazing sometimes.

Plus, the name Total Nonstop Action sucks a fatty.

I dunno, I'm just sayin'.

John la Rock
06-24-2004, 10:36 PM
lol TNA

WWE by a mile

Head
06-26-2004, 12:12 AM
WWF

Ferocious
06-26-2004, 12:18 AM
E C Dubya

Dirtyunderweartaker
06-26-2004, 12:39 AM
I WOULD GO WITH WWE, TNA IS WORSE THAN SOME OF THE WEAKEST WCW WRESTLERS BACK IN THEIR DAY.

I THINK BROCK LESNAR AND FEROCIOUS ALONE COULD TAKE ON TNA, AND TAKE THEM OUT


WWWWWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


OOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHH YYYYESSSSSS

James Steele
06-26-2004, 12:48 AM
Dirtyunderweartaker...

I'm just going to say one thing.

:nono:

I.J.S.&.I.A.O.T.M

c4g2
06-26-2004, 01:46 AM
I love the WWE.


:shifty:

Batsu
06-26-2004, 02:09 AM
WWE...

...but...TNA is a fresh change of pace. I hope it does catch on so the WWE product doesn't seem so... "safe".

LK
06-26-2004, 12:00 PM
Even though there are some real good things on TNA I am going to go with the WWE.

Wildcat789
06-26-2004, 01:05 PM
I think for every 3 topics made in the wrestling forums, theres 1 that is a jobber thread. One of the other ones is a better reason for a wrestling mod.

The fact that you said NWA:TNA is better than WWE is completely assinine. The owner is retarded. 15% of their roster has real talent. AJ Styles is the only new talent in that company worth looking at.

Are you like, one of those guys who says things to be different? I bet you watch smackdown for JBL. Nazi.

JK lol

mitch_h
06-26-2004, 02:19 PM
The owner is retarded. 15% of their roster has real talent.


Okay wait, are we talking about TNA or WWE here... :shifty:

HeartBreakMan2k
06-26-2004, 02:25 PM
AJ Styles is the only new talent in that company worth looking at.
l

*Cough*JerryLynn*Cough*ChristopherDaniels*Cough*

The Mackem
06-26-2004, 02:35 PM
*Cough*Half the roster*cough*

I still prefer WWE though because of the production values and the overall product but I like to see "alternative" wrestling.

foodstampchamp
06-26-2004, 02:39 PM
ROH

I second this.

Sensei Of Mattitude
06-26-2004, 04:26 PM
TNA.. its fresh and so clean.

WWE is so boring and repetitive anymore.

HeartBreakMan2k
06-26-2004, 04:36 PM
*Cough*Half the roster*cough*

I still prefer WWE though because of the production values and the overall product but I like to see "alternative" wrestling.

*Cough*TheMackem*Cough*

loopydate
06-26-2004, 04:56 PM
WWE...

...but...TNA is a fresh change of pace. I hope it does catch on so the WWE product doesn't seem so... "safe".
Agreed.

I prefer to watch WWE, simply for familiarity's sake, but Impact is exciting (when Dusty Rhodes and Jeff Jarrett aren't on my TV). The X Division wrestlers are what the WWE Cruiserweights should be.

I hope Vince actually watches Impact and decides "Hey! I bet Paul London could do that..."

Innovator
06-26-2004, 04:59 PM
WWE or TNA?

ECW

#1-norm-fan
06-26-2004, 05:29 PM
*Cough*JerryLynn*Cough*ChristopherDaniels*Cough*

I think he said NEW talent.

#1-norm-fan
06-26-2004, 05:33 PM
TNA is too damn gimmicky. The X divsion matches on Impact annoy me because about 90% of the time, someone is hitting a hurricanrana. It's rediculous. And then they don't sell it worth a sh</>it.

The Naitch
06-26-2004, 05:44 PM
I'm this close to putting the entire jWo stable on ignore. Fucking annoying spammers.

Anyways, I'd LOVE TNA to be a legit threat to WWE. Time will tell. Then I'd make my decision. But for now, WWE.

Savio
06-26-2004, 06:19 PM
WWWF

diamondcutter
06-27-2004, 02:34 AM
TNA. I've been waiting for a wrestling alternative since WCW was sold. I tape RAW and watch it later, hoping something interesting will happen---no such luck though. On the other hand, I've taped Impact!, and watched it more than once.

Wondermouse
06-27-2004, 03:11 AM
Chris Sabin, Frankie Kazarian, Abyss, Monty Brown, Chris Harris - five names off the top of my head that have never been in WCW or WWF and all are fine talents.

Savio
06-27-2004, 04:47 AM
Chris Sabin, Frankie Kazarian, Abyss, Monty Brown, Chris Harris - five names off the top of my head that have never been in WCW or WWF and all are fine talents.
What about Jeff hardy, Ron killings, Ken shamrock, Raven, and Double J?

Wondermouse
06-27-2004, 05:18 AM
I may be having slight memory problems, but I think those guys were in WCW or WWF.

Savio
06-27-2004, 05:21 AM
I may be having slight memory problems, but I think those guys were in WCW or WWF.
I know whose better out of the 5 The former WCW/WWFers or the "newbies"

Wondermouse
06-27-2004, 06:34 AM
Hardy can be entertaining, I love Killings, Shamrock's only good at looking like a monster, Raven's deteriorated but still watchable, and Double J has talent, but it overexposed.

I'd have to give it to the new five, I think.

HankScorpio
06-27-2004, 08:39 AM
WWE

TNA is interesting and almost as good, mainly because of Raven. But I'm never going to really enjoy any show with Jeff Jarrett on it

Mr. JL
06-27-2004, 01:32 PM
Hardy can be entertaining, I love Killings, Shamrock's only good at looking like a monster, Raven's deteriorated but still watchable, and Double J has talent, but it overexposed.

I'd have to give it to the new five, I think.
Raven's deteriorated? FUCK that! He's promo's are among the greatest that wrestling has ever seen. Considering he doesn't employ death-defying moves and keeps his style neutralized and still manages to have the match of the night, shows you that he knows how to tell a story in the ring. Raven is a one of a kind wrestler and character. There will never be another one like him. There will be many who will try to emulate him but they will never be able to follow in his footsteps.

Raven is GREAT not just "deteriorated but still watchable"!