unforgiven theme

[Joe Kerr]

What is the name of the saliva song from unforgiven?

[Hollywood Red]

I have a thread no more than 10 spots down the page that answers your question. Use it.

[Innovator]

survival of the sickest

[DaveWadding]

raddcock.jpg

[Hollywood Red]

survival of the sickestNow, see... see what you did there?

There's a thing called establishing order... we do it with animals, we do it with children and we do it with new posters.

When a kid or animal does something you'd rather they not do, or rather they do differently, you discipline them. Sometimes it's something like withholding treats or rewards... NO DESSERT FOR YOU!

This is no different. That thread exists because there was a demand for it and because its existence negates the need for these threads. When one of these threads DOES pop up, you refer the thread maker to THAT thread and eventually everyone learns to go there first.

But by answering his question you threw a wrench into all of that and you taught him that he doesn't need to follow the guidelines and go to that thread because eventually someone will come along and answer his question anyway rather than teaching him how to find the answer on his own.

Not only are you teaching him that the rules aren't important, you're breeding stupid and lazy people who wait for the answers to come to them rather than seeking out the answers on their own.

:rant: There, now I feel better.

[DaveWadding]

What we need to do is sticky that topic.

[HankScorpio]

Now, see... see what you did there?

There's a thing called establishing order... we do it with animals, we do it with children and we do it with new posters.

When a kid or animal does something you'd rather they not do, or rather they do differently, you discipline them. Sometimes it's something like withholding treats or rewards... NO DESSERT FOR YOU!

This is no different. That thread exists because there was a demand for it and because its existence negates the need for these threads. When one of these threads DOES pop up, you refer the thread maker to THAT thread and eventually everyone learns to go there first.

But by answering his question you threw a wrench into all of that and you taught him that he doesn't need to follow the guidelines and go to that thread because eventually someone will come along and answer his question anyway rather than teaching him how to find the answer on his own.

Not only are you teaching him that the rules aren't important, you're breeding stupid and lazy people who wait for the answers to come to them rather than seeking out the answers on their own.

:rant: There, now I feel better.


Do you feel better? good.

What a way to over-react, I mean talking about "disciplining" new posters, WTF, You've posted around 70 times. Am I to understand that because you've posted more times than the poster asking the question you're automatically better than him? I've posted around 900 times, and I'm still worth sh*t. the is no "order" to establish, live with it.

[Hollywood Red]

It was mainly a piss take... and I may have only 70 posts, but it doesn't mean I'm new to posting or message boards in general. And even then it doesn't matter... basically, this is the sentiment:

There's almost always someone each month who asks for the name of the PPV theme. You can eliminate those threads and, at the same time, provide a handy reference with that one thread. Giving the answer out negates the need for that thread and encourages the monthly threads.

Look at that how you want.

[Joe Kerr]

Wow the world just went into Anarchy because of a Q&A thread in the Q&A forum from someone that didnt see the Thread (not labeled clearly)

[DaveWadding]

Shut up, Radd.

[Innovator]

Now, see... see what you did there?

There's a thing called establishing order... we do it with animals, we do it with children and we do it with new posters.

When a kid or animal does something you'd rather they not do, or rather they do differently, you discipline them. Sometimes it's something like withholding treats or rewards... NO DESSERT FOR YOU!

This is no different. That thread exists because there was a demand for it and because its existence negates the need for these threads. When one of these threads DOES pop up, you refer the thread maker to THAT thread and eventually everyone learns to go there first.

But by answering his question you threw a wrench into all of that and you taught him that he doesn't need to follow the guidelines and go to that thread because eventually someone will come along and answer his question anyway rather than teaching him how to find the answer on his own.

Not only are you teaching him that the rules aren't important, you're breeding stupid and lazy people who wait for the answers to come to them rather than seeking out the answers on their own.

:rant: There, now I feel better.
bugger off