PDA

View Full Version : Do you approve of HHH's backstage powers?


Bad Guy
11-06-2004, 05:12 PM
yes or no. votes wont be shown.

MVP
11-06-2004, 05:19 PM
C'mon, that's like asking if Lita has ever botched a move.

Jonster
11-06-2004, 05:25 PM
But Lita's never botched a move - it was intentional :shifty:

123 kid
11-06-2004, 05:35 PM
NO

LK
11-06-2004, 05:36 PM
Hell no.

Disturbed316
11-06-2004, 05:52 PM
Of course not.

V
11-06-2004, 05:59 PM
do you approve of having your eyes poked with a rusty chainsaw?

Triple H
11-06-2004, 06:02 PM
Do you approve of HHH's backstage powers?

I approve.

James Steele
11-06-2004, 06:11 PM
Triple H forgot to finish that sentence:

I approve....


of being raped by a rusty chainsaw.







:shifty:

Jonster
11-06-2004, 06:15 PM
I approve.
:lol:

The Naitch
11-06-2004, 06:33 PM
I approve.

:rofl:

Mayo
11-06-2004, 09:43 PM
I approve of his powers. Anybody that could get destroyed by the Ultimate Warrior, fight in hog pen matches, then join a rowdy group of hooligans, have sex with a man-like beast, end up with a nice piece of ass like Steph, and in that time win WWE championships around 9 times gets my approval :y:

Triple H
11-06-2004, 10:04 PM
I approve of his powers. Anybody that could get destroyed by the Ultimate Warrior, fight in hog pen matches, then join a rowdy group of hooligans, have sex with a man-like beast, end up with a nice piece of ass like Steph, and in that time win WWE championships around 9 times gets my approval :y:

Thank you.

I'm glad there are a few smart people here.

Thriller
11-06-2004, 10:23 PM
Does anyone know for sure just how much pull he has.Sure he's married to the Steph,but does anyone know for a fact that wht hes the champ.Or maybe just maybe is it because hes the only person whose really over enough to hold the belt.

Mayo
11-06-2004, 11:12 PM
Thank you.

I'm glad there are a few smart people here.It was more of a joke actually.

But I do think that people blame him way too much. Vince probably has more of the blame than HHH for all of the holding down crap. I mean Vince caused one of his best friends, Pat Patterson, to leave the company after mentioning that Hunter might be hogging the spotlight too much. Vince probably has a really high opinion of his son in law, and although Hunter might use his sway (as anyone else would), Vince is also to blame for Hunter's politics.

Bad Guy
11-07-2004, 12:46 AM
Does anyone know for sure just how much pull he has.Sure he's married to the Steph,but does anyone know for a fact that wht hes the champ.Or maybe just maybe is it because hes the only person whose really over enough to hold the belt.
Well take it for what you want, but it is rumored that Vince is looking to give him his company when he retires/dies. Him and Steph will get the company and I guess Shane's out. :nono:

Thriller
11-07-2004, 02:13 AM
Well take it for what you want, but it is rumored that Vince is looking to give him his company when he retires/dies. Him and Steph will get the company and I guess Shane's out. :nono:
I don't see how that has any say in HHH pushing himself.Steph has always been part of the writing team and Shane took care of the buisness end of things.

FourFifty
11-07-2004, 02:48 AM
<font color=cyan>Saying "hell no" just doesn't seem to cut it in my eyes... It seems when someone else has the world title it's just borrowing from Triple H. I swear he put a deposit so when he jumps ship to TNA he could claim to be the real world's champion.

Thriller
11-07-2004, 10:50 AM
<font color=cyan>Saying "hell no" just doesn't seem to cut it in my eyes... It seems when someone else has the world title it's just borrowing from Triple H. I swear he put a deposit so when he jumps ship to TNA he could claim to be the real world's champion.
Its funny because HHH was without the belt for 6 months.

Sephiroth
11-07-2004, 11:03 AM
Hell no.

Gerard
11-07-2004, 11:06 AM
Its funny because HHH was without the belt for 6 months.


And that made a change, i think at one point he had the belt for 9-10 months before losing it. Hes already had the friggin thing 10 times so far, ever since like late 99 or so, nearly 6 years for 10 title runs? Shit hogans first decade in wwe he had it 5 times and he was the most popular wrestler in the company. The way the belt is now is like that other guy said, anytime anyone wins it its basically being borrowed because it always goes back to hhh.

He really needs to fuck off from the title scene for a while, like i said before, if he hasn't got the belt he's whoring air time bitching about wanting it, nomatter what hes ALWAYS in the title scene and its been that way for a few years now.

The backstage pull is another thing, you've basically got another mcmahon in the company now, if he wants something hes eventually gonna get it nomatter what.

darkpower
11-08-2004, 03:56 AM
I would approve of his powers if I could approve how he USES the powers given to him. He's single handedly made RAW weak, AGAIN. The problem with that is that he revolves the entire show around him all the time, and it gets to the point where we just don't CARE.

I disapprove of the way he uses the powers, thus I disapprove of him HAVING them.

Thriller
11-08-2004, 09:46 AM
And that made a change, i think at one point he had the belt for 9-10 months before losing it. Hes already had the friggin thing 10 times so far, ever since like late 99 or so, nearly 6 years for 10 title runs? Shit hogans first decade in wwe he had it 5 times and he was the most popular wrestler in the company. The way the belt is now is like that other guy said, anytime anyone wins it its basically being borrowed because it always goes back to hhh.

He really needs to fuck off from the title scene for a while, like i said before, if he hasn't got the belt he's whoring air time bitching about wanting it, nomatter what hes ALWAYS in the title scene and its been that way for a few years now.

The backstage pull is another thing, you've basically got another mcmahon in the company now, if he wants something hes eventually gonna get it nomatter what.
If you look at Hogans era as apposed to now things are alot different.Back thern ther was no Monday or Thursday tv and there was only 4 ppvs.I think it Hogon was in this era hed have beatens flairs record,HHH is always in the title picture for the reason sfor the sole reason of there in no one else really big enough or deserving of the push.At least from a heel standpoint.And if WWE pushes someone to try and get someone new everyone will shit on the idea.

TheNamelessOne
11-08-2004, 12:16 PM
HHH is always in the title picture for the reason sfor the sole reason of there in no one else really big enough or deserving of the push.At least from a heel standpoint.And if WWE pushes someone to try and get someone new everyone will shit on the idea.
Actually, no one will shit on the idea unless they suck. The difference between guys like Matt Hardy, Jericho and Christian when compared to Heidenreich, Mark Henry or Rodney Mack is that one group deserves better pushes, and the other lot don't deserve to be in the WWE at all. People will complain about Mark Henry winning the belt, but I doubt you will find a large amount of people annoyed at Jericho winning it again.

I mean look at the reaction to the Randy Orton push on here.

Mr. Nerfect
11-08-2004, 04:13 PM
I definately approve of Triple H's powers, as Triple H has them. I don't approve of Vince McMahon and the crew giving him the power, but if they feel like giving it to them, I approve of their decision (it's not like I ever an a multi-million dollar company).

I was all over the place there wasn't I. :-\

Anyway, what I'm trying to say is, I don't like them so to speak, but if he used them to help the product ("Hey Vince, maybe Steven Richards should get an upset victory over me on RAW this week?"), I would find myself liking them. I don't feel like I am in a position to declare if Trips deserves his powers or not, but if the WWE have allowed them to him, I guess they must have faith in him.

tucsonspeed6
11-08-2004, 04:42 PM
The backstage powers are fine....it's when he starts with the lasers from the eyes that I put my foot down!

Thriller
11-08-2004, 09:37 PM
Actually, no one will shit on the idea unless they suck. The difference between guys like Matt Hardy, Jericho and Christian when compared to Heidenreich, Mark Henry or Rodney Mack is that one group deserves better pushes, and the other lot don't deserve to be in the WWE at all. People will complain about Mark Henry winning the belt, but I doubt you will find a large amount of people annoyed at Jericho winning it again.

I mean look at the reaction to the Randy Orton push on here.

Actually if i remember correctally alot of people were against the idea of Orton winning the belt so soon.When Benoit was the champ alot of people complained because he didnt have the mic skills.The fact of the matter is HHh IS THE TOP HEEL in the company.Though Jericho is good as a heel ,hes far more entertaining as a face.Christian and Matt Hardy arent ready yet for the big spot.So who else as heel would be to top contender for the belt.Kane?He was in the picture fpr a while. other than that theres no other big heels,Therefore hes obviously6 gonna be in the title pcture.Because face vs face matches get boring after a while/

HeartBreakMan2k
11-08-2004, 11:27 PM
Do I approve? No, however I still do think he's the smartest SOB in the company.