View Full Version : Undertaker is better as a....
The Answer
11-19-2004, 10:57 PM
Which persona do you prefer Heel taker or Face taker.Personally I think he is better as a heel.The Ministry angle was the coolest angle I had ever seen in wrestling couldn't wait for the next raw to see who would join his cult.
Shadow
11-19-2004, 11:01 PM
I prefer it when he's not selling moves at all. Just absorbing punishment and then doing the sit up. Great snit.
The Answer
11-19-2004, 11:02 PM
Just added a poll
Mr. Nerfect
11-19-2004, 11:05 PM
I like dit when he was emotionless, and absorbant. Right now I don't get why anyone on the roster should be afraid of him. He' still the same Undertaker who rode around on a motorcycle from 2000-2004.
RemyRed
11-19-2004, 11:07 PM
My favorite was when he was heel as a biker, making people famous.
The CyNick
11-19-2004, 11:22 PM
I think he has to be a face, too respected, too big of a star to be a legit heel at this point.
I liked him the best just before he went back to the Deadman gimmick. He was starting to sell a little, and at his age it would make sense to have him start to be 'less' invinceible. To me anyway, it made him a more sympathetic character.
Aussie Skier
11-19-2004, 11:53 PM
i like him as neither.
what i would liek is if the undertaker didnt neccasarily fight only heels. Maybe a beat-down to a face every so often woudl be cool
I like him as a heel and I think it seems more logical that a dead man is evil. I want to see him as he was in the ministry. That was cool! Face undertaker was boring as hell but all faces seem boring to me due to the fact that all of them see to do the same things.
Face Undertaker is just boring these days so one more heel run wouldn't hurt; won't happen though since he's way too over.
BigDaddyCool
11-20-2004, 01:25 AM
anything but bikertaker, and even that had its moment
the_rock's_#1_fan
11-20-2004, 03:25 PM
either way he still knows how to kick tons of you know what after 15-20 years in the industry and he will probably surpass flair in popularity by the end of his storied career. Just read a book all about his past last night, man did he have a lot of drawn out feuds and only 2 championships by the end of 97. Never knew his career was so rough.
Innovator
11-20-2004, 03:28 PM
he rules either way
I'd say heel Deadman. Great shit from him there. He can be so damn evil. Yet, he was pretty crazy as a heel biker, too.
He's great either way, but I like him better as a heel.
Sephiroth
11-20-2004, 03:52 PM
I like The Undertaker as a face and as a heel, but The Ministry angle was GREAT imo...
Disturbed316
11-20-2004, 04:41 PM
Yeah, Undertaker was good as either a heel or face, but you couldn't beat heel Ministry Taker.
SuperSlim
11-20-2004, 04:49 PM
heel ministry taker was the absolute best. So evil it was like it was him. It fit so well. the face taker? he was aight. Biker taker to me was the worst cause he just wasn't The Undertaker. He was just some biker that looked like him. SHoulda been Chainz of DOA since it was him that did Taker at SummerSlam '94-awesome match btw
Then this "deadman" is nothin but Biker taker with a super long entrance. And he also uses the tombstone now. Too many emotions. Be evil. Don't care.
He rules as either. Heel Mininstry was cool. Face Taker during the feuds with Mankind and Kane were also brilliant.
Nark Order
11-20-2004, 06:12 PM
Darkness should never be face....
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.