lawty60
08-22-2005, 10:34 AM
What if the WWE intoduced a new brand to co-exist (not rival) with Smackdown and Raw?
The WWE could scrap programmes like Velocity and have one highlights show per week. Raw and Smackdown could stay as they are with the introduction of another recorded show to be shown sometime during the week.
- new talent and lesser 'superstars' could 'cut their teeth' and gain experience.
- longer feuds and angles for low/mid carders allowing characters to develop, instead of one off matches on Velocity or Heat.
- Other titles would be given more air time afterall, having only 3 titles defended on a PPV is pretty poor!
- New characters could be tried out on TV without affecting Raw or Smackdown.
Successful characters/wrestlers/angles could then make the jump to Raw or Smackdown .
Just an idea. But then seeing as though the WWE writers cant produce enough decent storylines to sustain two shows, maybe three is one too many!!
The WWE could scrap programmes like Velocity and have one highlights show per week. Raw and Smackdown could stay as they are with the introduction of another recorded show to be shown sometime during the week.
- new talent and lesser 'superstars' could 'cut their teeth' and gain experience.
- longer feuds and angles for low/mid carders allowing characters to develop, instead of one off matches on Velocity or Heat.
- Other titles would be given more air time afterall, having only 3 titles defended on a PPV is pretty poor!
- New characters could be tried out on TV without affecting Raw or Smackdown.
Successful characters/wrestlers/angles could then make the jump to Raw or Smackdown .
Just an idea. But then seeing as though the WWE writers cant produce enough decent storylines to sustain two shows, maybe three is one too many!!