Log in

View Full Version : John Cena/Eric Bischoff Title Situation *RAW Spoilers I guess*


Mr. Nerfect
08-23-2005, 01:11 AM
OK, so Eric Bischoff doesn't want John Cena to be the top Champion on RAW, right? Why doesn't he just split the WWE Title's WWE and WCW lineage then?

I'm not sure if it's possible or not, but stranger things have happened. Stephanie McMahon had re-instated the United States Title on SD! after it had been unified with the WWE Intercontinental Championship. Although, I think the US Title may have just been discontinued when Edge won both the IC and US belts, then the Alliance lost to the WWE making all their titles invalid (except for the WCW and Cruiserweight Titles).

Anyway, I was thinking, now he has the WWE and WCW Titles under his juristriction, why doesn't he split them up, and award the WCW Title (with a new belt) to a top heel. Chris Jericho would have been good if he wasn't taking time off. I suppose you could make Shawn Michaels vs. Chris Masters for it, or have Shelton Benjamin or Kane awarded the belt. Triple H is probably itching for another World Championship.

Granted, the idea would probably make things too cluttered, but it would be interesting to see Cena try and pick up the fragments of his once whole "Undisputed" Championship.

Shadow
08-23-2005, 02:12 AM
No cause that title was techincally made into the WTH with the Rock being the last champ.

Then Hunter got it from Bischoff and now it's on Smackdown so it's all confusing!

Mr. Nerfect
08-23-2005, 02:15 AM
The World Heavyweight Title is on SmackDown!, and that was created from the actual WCW Title belt, but the belt's history still remains in the WWE Title.

If they actually explained it, I think it would make sense.

Shadow
08-23-2005, 02:17 AM
Yeah it would...but since they don't...and you're the only one who knows....

*shoots Alienoid to stop this great idea from getting out*

Funky Fly
08-23-2005, 02:23 AM
Maybe because 2 belts on 1 show is nuts and one belt always ends up appearing lesser in value.

Joey Slugs
08-23-2005, 03:54 AM
We have enough trouble with what history goes to what belt. It's a great idea, but like you said.. it would just get too cluttered.

Kane Knight
08-23-2005, 11:42 AM
Maybe because 2 belts on 1 show is nuts and one belt always ends up appearing lesser in value.

Or because it defeats the purpose of the Corporation busting down on Austin?

Simpler answer. :D

High Impact v.W.o
08-23-2005, 11:46 AM
*insert coment about WWE not using their current titles here*