View Full Version : Who doesn't need the belt?
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 01:03 AM
The big title (WWE or WHT respectively) Primarily.
Kane: I honestly don't ever want to see Kane with the belt, unless he's bashing the champ's brains in. He should be a wild monster with no eyes for the title.
redoneja
09-04-2005, 01:10 AM
Big Show- He should just dominate everyone like Andre did. If they do give him the belt again, then it should take an Act of God to get it off him.
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 01:31 AM
Show's in a similar boat as Kane, yes
HeartBreakMan2k
09-04-2005, 01:35 AM
Gene Snitsky, obviously I don't want him to have the time because he sucks, but also it doesn't fit his character.
FourFifty
09-04-2005, 01:36 AM
Triple H
(insert basic Triple H rant here) big nose (bash Triple H unfairly here) hold down (steal a line from Sean O'Haire here)!
Destor
09-04-2005, 01:46 AM
Lita
Im sexist, whatcha gonna do?
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 01:49 AM
Lita
Im sexist, whatcha gonna do?
Who doesn't NEED the belt. What does that have to do with sexism?
Destor
09-04-2005, 01:52 AM
I said Lita shouldn't have the simply because I'm sexist. Damn you're defensive. Shit...
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 02:30 AM
How is that defensive? I simply elaborated on a topic you evidently didn't understand.
..Not a first, mind you.
Now back under the whote sheet for you, laddy.
Jaton
09-04-2005, 02:37 AM
I don't think HBK needs another title run either. He's already been established as one of the top wrestlers ever. I think if he DOES get another title run, it should just be one last run out of respect for his career. And perhaps to put over someone deserving.
Destor
09-04-2005, 03:20 AM
How didn't I understand it? Are you saying Lita NEEDS a title run? Again, Lita doesn't NEED the title. My reasoning is because I wouldn't give the title to a woman. I think that applies to this topic.
dablackguy
09-04-2005, 03:39 AM
Hogan- Too old, not believable, etc
HHH- Enough said
Taker: Just cause it'd be a waste on a guy who shows up to one show a month
Mr. Nerfect
09-04-2005, 04:15 AM
I disagree with the Kane thing. One way I can envision him returning is with a promo about how he's sick of being directionless, and he entered this business to win the World Title.
I honestly don't think HBK or Triple H need any more title runs. They've done what the can with the World Title, having them win the belt again will not make them any more credible.
Favre4Ever
09-04-2005, 04:15 AM
A heel HBK title run would be the absolute shit right about now.
Eugene.........because i'm tired of King talking about whether Eugene wrote his name on that fucking napkin.
Favre4Ever
09-04-2005, 04:17 AM
HBK did what he did with the title long enough ago for many casual fans to forget its impact. I'm not saying he necessarily needs the title, but it wouldnt be a bad idea.
Not face HBK though. Fuck that guy.
Impact!
09-04-2005, 08:56 AM
JBL - I like the guy, but winning the title ain't right.
Dave Youell
09-04-2005, 10:44 AM
As far as i'm concerned the belt should be used to elevate talent and in some cases the belt itself, therefore HHH shouldn't be near it.
Same goes for:
HBK
Taker
Flair
JBL
Jaton
09-04-2005, 01:00 PM
It truly breaks my heart to say this, but I don't agree with JBL not needing it. He's already established as a main-eventer, he had a decent run, and he's hilarious.
I feel ashamed. :(
Favre4Ever
09-04-2005, 01:44 PM
good.
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 02:05 PM
I think
No, you didn't. There's the problem.
Back to your Bible, now. :)
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 02:06 PM
(Hey, you were desperately trying for a reaction, I'm giving you one).
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 02:09 PM
As far as i'm concerned the belt should be used to elevate talent and in some cases the belt itself, therefore HHH shouldn't be near it.
Same goes for:
HBK
Taker
Flair
JBL
I think that the title still elevates the wrestling God. Michaels and Taker should only be in title matches to elevate the other guy (Though HBK with the title isn't horrible, he just doesn't need to be elevated).
roach21
09-04-2005, 02:09 PM
Benoit, nothing against the guy I just don't want to see him headlining any PPV's anytime soon as heavyweight champ. His last title reign was boring to say the least.
Chavo Classic
09-04-2005, 02:45 PM
Benoit, nothing against the guy I just don't want to see him headlining any PPV's anytime soon as heavyweight champ. His last title reign was boring to say the least.
No, his last reign wasn't pushed or promoted enough. Apart from the feud with HHH & HBK (simaltenously I might add) and the short program with Kane (which wasn't even the main event of that particular PPV) what else did he do and who did he feud with?
Its a disgrace with title run wasn't pushed enough. It was obviously evident from his win at Wrestlemania and a large proportion of the fans (both smart and non-) wanted to see him with the belt. But nothing was done and he jobbed to Orton without so much of a build up
Chavo Classic
09-04-2005, 03:14 PM
Anyway, I don't believe that Cena needs the belt at the moment. I'd rather see him chase for the title - I might be able to muster enough interest then.
Other than that, I'm ok with the current champions. Nunzio is a good choice for cruiserweight champion - he can put on a decent show and sells for almost anything and anyone. The tag champions on Raw are decent given the shallow talent pool in the division. Carlito and Benoit are two of my prefered performances (albeit it for very different reasons) and Batista is doing a great job as the monster champion. Once MNM get their belts back its all fine.
oh, and some chick called Trish has the women's championship :D
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 05:18 PM
Benoit, nothing against the guy I just don't want to see him headlining any PPV's anytime soon as heavyweight champ. His last title reign was boring to say the least.
T obe fair, his last title reign was boring because he was second fiddle. The main deal was the feud between Michaels and Hog...Errr...Hunter.
On the other hand, he doesn't much need the belt.
Chavo Classic
09-04-2005, 06:14 PM
He doesn't need the US belt anyway. Although the belt might need him after OJ's "triumphant" reign
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 06:29 PM
He doesn't need the US belt anyway. Although the belt might need him after OJ's "triumphant" reign
Yeah, the belt doesn't mean a thing right now.
More or elss like the IC belt on Raw. Benoit's not about being champion, he's about kicking ass and taking names. The belt's on for the ride, nothing more.
Chavo Classic
09-04-2005, 06:34 PM
Carlito's a good champion. He just needs a good feud with a good challenger
Come in Mr Benjamin!
Chavo Classic
09-04-2005, 06:36 PM
Benoit's not about being champion, he's about kicking ass and taking names. The belt's on for the ride, nothing more.
Perhaps. It wouldn't do any harm seeing Benoit chasing the championship once more though. Perhaps as a heel and the face trying desperately to fend off the relentlessa and savage pursuits of the Rabid Wolverine. It'd put over the champion and re-inforce Benoit as a beast and someone who other wrestlers are scared of
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 06:36 PM
Carlito's a good champion. He just needs a good feud with a good challenger
Come in Mr Benjamin!
You're not a good champ if you don't defend yoru title.
Kane Knight
09-04-2005, 06:37 PM
Perhaps. It wouldn't do any harm seeing Benoit chasing the championship once more though. Perhaps as a heel and the face trying desperately to fend off the relentlessa and savage pursuits of the Rabid Wolverine. It'd put over the champion and re-inforce Benoit as a beast and someone who other wrestlers are scared of
I'd rather see him trying to take out some of the baddest men on SD. Imagine him trying to make Taker tap? :D
Chavo Classic
09-04-2005, 06:38 PM
Then let him defend.
I said come in Mr Benjamin!
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.