Log in

View Full Version : For those who saw No Mercy, What did you think of Main Event compared to Unforgiven's


CharismaInjection
10-14-2005, 05:29 AM
These last two pay-per-views featured these main event.

Unforgiven:
Kurt Angle v.s. John Cena.

No Mercy:
Eddie Guerrero v.s. Batista.

Which main event did you prefer and why. Now I know a lot of people didn't watch No Mercy, but those that did, which Main Event was better.

These are Smackdown and Raw's main players, and which one puts on a better main event really says how the champions compare to each other.

I personally prefered Eddie v.s. Batista. It was a more entertaining fight, where Eddie was torn between cheating and staying clean. The only improvement I could've suggested was for Batista to win from a Batista Bomb, because a spinebuster doesn't seem like a powerful enough move to pin someone.

What are your thoughts on the better main event?

Jaton
10-14-2005, 06:27 AM
Eddie vs. Batista had great psychology to it.

Destor
10-14-2005, 06:30 AM
I have to vote Batista/Eddie by default. I haven't seen Kurt/Cena.

The One
10-14-2005, 12:26 PM
I said Angle/Cena....Eddie/Batista was very well done, but Unforgiven had Kurt Fucking God of the Wrestling Ring and Hero to All Angle. Sorry, but Angle can carry even Cena to a good match.

Team Sheep
10-14-2005, 01:17 PM
I prefered the Eddie/Batista storyline heading into the match, but in terms of match entertainment, I prefered Angle/Cena.

snakeboss
10-14-2005, 02:13 PM
I really enjoyed Eddie & Batista's match, it was really entertaining and I didn't have a clue who would win so I was on the edge of my seat.

Angle was ace in the match, but Cena...meh. This is second only cuz Cena has absolutely no wrestling talent, all he does is the spinner slam, five knuckle shuffle and FU.