PDA

View Full Version : So how was RAW?


Mr. Nerfect
10-24-2005, 10:51 PM
Without giving me spoilers, etc., could someone please rate (honestly) how RAW ranked out of 10? Was it decent, or mess?

Shadow
10-24-2005, 10:56 PM
-2.

Loose Cannon
10-24-2005, 10:58 PM
^LOL. The only guy bad mouthing it in the thread

Shadow
10-24-2005, 11:03 PM
Yeah...and I'll do it again next week to. RAW did nothing for me this week. And if I get negged rep...fuck you all.

Loose Cannon
10-24-2005, 11:07 PM
AHAHAHAHAHA

Shadow
10-24-2005, 11:10 PM
AHAHAHAHAHA

BUT THEY HAVE SIX SIDES!

Really orginal pal. What happened to you? I thought you were cool.

Destor
10-24-2005, 11:14 PM
6. Funny for the most part. The opening match was shit and the main events finish was a little meh.

Favre4Ever
10-24-2005, 11:14 PM
Yeah man, all the cool kids like TNA.

STONE COLD STONE COLD STONE COLD STONE COLD

Corkscrewed
10-24-2005, 11:17 PM
5/10

One funny though done-before segment. Four matches. More promos. A match that never happened. Although you get to see Nicki (sp?) James' nice ass for extended periods of time because USA isn't a pussy channel like UPN.

loopydate
10-24-2005, 11:44 PM
*Mickie

I don't know. I thought tonight's show was kinda weak.

Like I was saying in the Taboo Tuesday thread before, the voting isn't rigged, but we saw tonight how the crowd is going to vote. Lemmings off a cliff.

The McMahon segment was Vickesque in its unwatchability. I like taking the piss out of JR as much as the next guy, but that's where I draw the line (yes, the pun was intended).

Best moment of the night was the Austin swerve, and that is eight different kinds of sad.

FourFifty
10-25-2005, 01:52 AM
I was impressed. I'm gonna give it a 7/10 because...
SPOILERS! HIGHLIGHT TO READ!
<font color=black>It's better if you don't read spoilers.</font color>

RP
10-25-2005, 02:16 AM
I liked it especially when Jake The Snake came out and threw the snake on Angle. That ruled.

What Would Kevin Do?
10-25-2005, 03:17 AM
I'd say 6/10

I actually didn't mind the first match. HBK vs Big Show worked out nicely... The botch near the end sucked, but hey. The only thing I really didn't like was how the Vince skit stretched on and on.

Morgan
10-25-2005, 09:58 AM
I fell asleep before it started. For the third time. In a row.

alvarado52
10-25-2005, 11:59 AM
5, your average Raw. I basically watched Raw now to see who botches a move this week. This week? Kane.

owenbrown
10-25-2005, 12:34 PM
5.628931074/10

JH
10-25-2005, 12:56 PM
i'll give the vince-jr segment a 8 cause i was lmao

overall show 4

Sadistic
10-25-2005, 01:20 PM
2 out of 10

KingofOldSchool
10-25-2005, 01:23 PM
But if Kurt Angle did a triple jump moonsault through three burning tables onto a pool filled with thumbtacks and battery acid, then Sadistic would rate it an above average show.

Dave Youell
10-25-2005, 01:29 PM
i'd give it a 3, fucking weak compared to the recent product they've been showing

Corkscrewed
10-26-2005, 04:16 AM
Agreed.

Altho my 5/10 is like a failing grade. 50% = failing. :(

PYRO-MANIAC
10-26-2005, 05:53 AM
Not ENOUGH WRESTLING!

Simple as that, very poor show.

Plus this whole Taboo Tuesday thing is just too predictable, its basically what the WWE wants not what we want. I sent them a feedback letter yesterday explaining how i think this Taboo Tuesday will be the worst ever, it lacks imagination and excitement, where are the choices?? :roll: :n:

Raw for me was just one big advert for Taboo Tuesday, a few exciting moments but other than that pretty.. meh! :-\

Oh and the Mcmahon segment was ridiculous and god forbid if some young kid was watching that with there parents! :lol:

Astley316
10-26-2005, 01:38 PM
without spoiling too much i enjoyed it all, apart from the segment with mcmahon, just wasnt my sorta humor 6/10

Londoner
10-27-2005, 09:45 AM
I'm still calling for an end to this roster split.I can still watch a whole Raw, but i feel they could do much better if they had more wrestlers/more titles to work with.Look at how many matches there used to be on raw/smackdown, I don't see why the WWE still thinks this way is a good idea.Ok you could argue that some big name wrestlers would lose out, but then that's up to the writers to be creative.And maybe they could even make the show 3 hours long.

For this week though I'm giving it a 5/10.