KillerWolf
01-28-2006, 06:11 PM
i dont think that the title match at the Royal Rumble between Kurt Angle and Mark Henry is going to be any good.
1. Mark Henry is not any better of a wrestler than he was the last time he was actively in wwe. i dont think that even Kurt Angle can carry this to a descent match. I always used to fast forward through Mysterio vs. Big Show matches, ect. well this is the same concept. it's speed vs. size...yeah i get it. it's interesting for about a minute and a half, tops.
2. does anyone actually believe that the next wwe champion can be Mark fuckin' Henry??? he has been a happy-go-lucky jobber for all his career. so when did he all the sudden become a threat? i dont like it when someone comes in outta nowhere, and all the sudden they're the #1 contender. it took Undertaker a year to get a title shot. Mark Henry has been back for like three weeks. what path of destruction has he laid to get a title shot - beating Rey a couple of times and a couple of no-names in a handicap match!?!
i dont think im going to be proven wrong on this.
1. Mark Henry is not any better of a wrestler than he was the last time he was actively in wwe. i dont think that even Kurt Angle can carry this to a descent match. I always used to fast forward through Mysterio vs. Big Show matches, ect. well this is the same concept. it's speed vs. size...yeah i get it. it's interesting for about a minute and a half, tops.
2. does anyone actually believe that the next wwe champion can be Mark fuckin' Henry??? he has been a happy-go-lucky jobber for all his career. so when did he all the sudden become a threat? i dont like it when someone comes in outta nowhere, and all the sudden they're the #1 contender. it took Undertaker a year to get a title shot. Mark Henry has been back for like three weeks. what path of destruction has he laid to get a title shot - beating Rey a couple of times and a couple of no-names in a handicap match!?!
i dont think im going to be proven wrong on this.