PDA

View Full Version : tna's future is not good at all


yknits god
02-25-2006, 06:26 PM
I'm gonna say it up front so you haters out there don't throw a bret hart bitch fit like you got screwed in montreal. I will be taking shots at tna in my post and i don't really care what you think or say. so just sit back and relax.

TNA is coming upon there 4 year anniversary. For 2 years they filmed out of tennessee weekly ppv's. Then they moved to florida and had a deal with fox sports net. Many problems on tna's part here. They were prolly better off when they ran there weekly ppv's in tennessee. When they were on fsn they were shown on friday afternoons. The deal with fsn went sour. Face it everybody knew it would. You will never be a success if nobody watches your show.(and nobody did except the idiots who got home from school and want to watch high-spot wrestling.) Then they posted the impact show on there website. I'm not even gonna comment on that. Now in 2006 they are on spike tv. There ratings are the same as they were on fsn. Through out there history tna has tried to bring in old washed up has beens wait no i mean "BIG NAMED STARS" like ddp, nash, hall, hogan to get some fans to watch there "SHOW"(its all high spots people) They have and are wasting there money on these so called stars. thats a cold hard FACT! They prolly put tna into debt even deeper. tna is not a big enough promotion to pay the salaries that they asked for. TNA is breaking even. will tna EVER be a major player to WWE? hmmm lets see i think the anwser is NO!

Most of your posts will try to (keyword try) knock wwe and me and praise the little tiny promotion that wont and never will tna. so have fun but deep down im right.

HaTeR
02-25-2006, 06:47 PM
I didn't even read your post and I can already tell it's just mindless ranting.

Blitz
02-25-2006, 06:47 PM
You've given no concrete reasons whatsoever.

The One
02-25-2006, 06:51 PM
I like how you running in here saying the same stuff we have been saying for over a year and then pass it off as you showing us up.

Could I knock WWE? Sure I could, I could for hours on end...but that has nothing to do with TNA.

Could I praise TNA? Sure I could, I could for hours on end...but that would come across as I am trying to challenge you, which I choose not to waste my time on.

[[On a side note, I could easily praise WWE for hours and tear TNA a new asshole. Accept that both companies are doing thing right and doing a lot of things wrong.]]

Mr. JL
02-25-2006, 07:06 PM
TNA is moving to PRIME TIME in the future, how could that possibly not be good?

buttt i guss taht is a dificoult 2 uderstad conzidderrring you R dumsz!

Xero
02-25-2006, 07:33 PM
Most of your posts will try to (keyword try) knock wwe and me and praise the little tiny promotion that wont and never will tna. so have fun but deep down im right.
I've said in the past that I critique TNA harshly, but I do respect them. But have you read any threads on TNA from the last two years here?

Quite frankly, I think TNA is doing just as bad as the WWE right now, if not worse.

Xero
02-25-2006, 07:47 PM
Just read his post and would just like to point out a few things...

Then they posted the impact show on there website. I'm not even gonna comment on that.
Yeah, um, I'm gonna go check something, BRB... Yep, I was right. The WWE shows Velocity and Heat on their website. :eek:

There ratings are the same as they were on fsn. Through out there history tna has tried to bring in old washed up has beens wait no i mean "BIG NAMED STARS" like ddp, nash, hall, hogan to get some fans to watch there "SHOW"(its all high spots people) They have and are wasting there money on these so called stars. thats a cold hard FACT! They prolly put tna into debt even deeper.
Hogan, Austin, Animal, Tatanka, Foley, Hacksaw, etc. The WWE doesn't bring people in who are washed up and/or request more money than they should get. No-sir-ee-bob!

will tna EVER be a major player to WWE? hmmm lets see i think the anwser is NO!
Thanks for the news flash genius.

I'm gonna say it up front so you haters out there don't throw a bret hart bitch fit like you got screwed in montreal. I will be taking shots at tna in my post and i don't really care what you think or say. so just sit back and relax.
WHAT THE FUCK!?

(Insert long-winded "you spoiled it for me" speech here.)

The One
02-25-2006, 08:21 PM
When you say future, you're talking about the ability to challenge WWE to wrestling's biggest promtoion. No. TNA will never be that without something similar to WCW's start. However WWE is NOT the only promotion to be making money. There are companies all over the world are making in the millions per year. TNA is something different then WWE. WWE is moving themselves to not be a pro wrestling company, but more of a pop culture experience. It's not for red neck trailer park anymore. TNA is aiming to attract people who want to watch the X-Division. Granted the X-Division is nothing more then a spot fest...but it's marketable. And under this giant umbrella where anyone who throws a move not intended to hurt someone is called a pro wrestler, it's a marketable part of the three ringed circus.

D Mac
02-25-2006, 08:25 PM
Do you know wwefan4life?

6to1
02-25-2006, 08:34 PM
i think tna is moving up you said in your post yourself it started with once a week ppv, to once a week on afternoon tv, to a spike deal on sat night, to primetime on thur night the best tv night. thats pretty damm good in 4 years

Sting Fan
02-25-2006, 08:54 PM
TNA is a company on the rise, will they be competition to WWE? WHo knows.

Is the WWE product slack at times? Yes, ditto for TNA.

None of this however changes the fact that you good sir are vying for dumbest poster of the year award.

Londoner
02-25-2006, 10:57 PM
TNA is a company on the rise, will they be competition to WWE? WHo knows.

Is the WWE product slack at times? Yes, ditto for TNA.

None of this however changes the fact that you good sir are vying for dumbest poster of the year award.

I completely agree with this.

Why does the original poster think we are such fans of TNA?

Xero
02-25-2006, 11:07 PM
I completely agree with this.

Why does the original poster think we are such fans of TNA?
Because he, and all "wannabe smarks" think that all "Smart Marks" love promotions like TNA for the simple fact that they're not the WWE, as that seems to be the "in" think.

I think I "quoted" too many times "there"...

Londoner
02-25-2006, 11:23 PM
Oh right, maybe they should read posts on message boards like this and see what we really think instead of just assuming and making themselves look like dumbasses.(thats a tip for you for the future, yknits god, as well as all the other dumbshits that think like you)

Xero
02-25-2006, 11:39 PM
Well, that, or they hover around the TNA forum and WWE.com chat too much...

PullMyFinger
02-25-2006, 11:44 PM
TNA is a company on the rise, will they be competition to WWE? WHo knows.

Is the WWE product slack at times? Yes, ditto for TNA.

None of this however changes the fact that you good sir are vying for dumbest poster of the year award.
Agreed 100%

Mr. Nerfect
02-26-2006, 01:13 AM
TNA has the potential to be good. If they had some money, and they listened to their fans when they chanted "Drop the Title!" to Jeff Jarrett (they've finally taken the belt off him now), I think they COULD potentially compete with the WWE.

If they managed to work out a deal with Main Event over here, I would certainly order TNA PPVs over WWE PPVs.

Fryza
02-26-2006, 01:35 AM
Yknits likes men.

St. Jimmy
02-26-2006, 02:43 AM
my opinions on TNA:
Joe is over-rated.
Styles Clash sucks.
Team Canada is awesome.
Christian is believeable with the belt.
the Pounce makes me die laughing.
i mark out for Shark Boy.

i'm not a bit of a TNA fan, but atleast they're trying.

.44 Magdalene
02-26-2006, 03:41 AM
LOL, I normally wouldn't say something this unreasonable, but this has to be one of the most retarded posts I've ever read. Not just on TPWW. I mean on any message board. Even amongst forums made SPECIFICALLY for the mentally handicapped will you not find something so blatantly illogical, pointless and easily arguable.

I know it's been said, but this is nothing but shit everyone's already been saying. How nice of you, yknits god, to bring all the major criticism of TNA into a single thread that's both poorly worded AND kills all credibility that the criticism actually has by making it sound like YOU came up with it. What was the point of this post? Seriously. Were you telling us anything new? Were you enlightening us with freshly revealed information? Were you sharing your own knowledge?

Or did you kick your blender into Bullshit Speed and totally ruin what would sound intelligent coming from anyone else?

I think you're just looking to piss people off, really, and you're not even doing a good job of that. You're just making me long for the day when parents have to take common sense and/or drug tests before they're allowed to mate.

Pinnacle Charisma
02-26-2006, 06:22 AM
ynits god if your going to write about post about how tna's future isnt good why you i dont know write some opinions to explain your opinion.

You are just writing some facts about the tna's ratings and thier history. None of this explains why tna wont go anywhere.

Why dont you explain why think high spot wrestling wont catch on or problems with tna policies or their talent or wont your little brain let you do that?

Xero
02-26-2006, 10:46 AM
ynits god if your going to write about post about how tna's future isnt good why you i dont know write some opinions to explain your opinion.

You are just writing some facts about the tna's ratings and thier history. None of this explains why tna wont go anywhere.

Why dont you explain why think high spot wrestling wont catch on or problems with tna policies or their talent or wont your little brain let you do that?
yknits god: highspots suck beekauze they don't have sycologey.

Oh, and REALLY original name, "Stinky Dog"... :roll:

The MAC
02-26-2006, 02:57 PM
michael jackson touches him late at night

Kris P Lettus
02-26-2006, 04:01 PM
You will never be a success if nobody watches your show.(and nobody did except the idiots who got home from school and want to watch high-spot wrestling.)


That's like saying "no one listens to rap music except people who want to hear beats and rhymes"..

hb2k
02-26-2006, 06:36 PM
There ratings are the same as they were on fsn.

Well seeing as how the ratings are percentage, and more people access Spike, and are watching TV at that time, that means that considerably more people are watching.

Shadow
02-27-2006, 01:17 AM
michael jackson touches him late at night

I doubt even the great Child Molster himself would want a piece of that crazy train.

darkpower
02-27-2006, 05:39 AM
I'm gonna say it up front so you haters out there don't throw a bret hart bitch fit like you got screwed in montreal. I will be taking shots at tna in my post and i don't really care what you think or say. so just sit back and relax.

Ehhh....ok! Go right ahead...just don't think that me sitting back and relaxing means that I'm just letting you suck my dick anytime soon. That's for more privlaged people...which isn't you. (more like Maria, but that's for another time).

TNA is coming upon there 4 year anniversary. For 2 years they filmed out of tennessee weekly ppv's.

I didn't know there was a place called "tennessee weekly ppv's". Is it nice this time of year?

Then they moved to florida and had a deal with fox sports net. Many problems on tna's part here. They were prolly better off when they ran there weekly ppv's in tennessee. When they were on fsn they were shown on friday afternoons. The deal with fsn went sour. Face it everybody knew it would. You will never be a success if nobody watches your show.(and nobody did except the idiots who got home from school and want to watch high-spot wrestling.)

Umm...dude. do you realize what FSN was? It was a regional sports network. Some regions, many, pre-empted the show for their own shit. No one will watch the show if they CAN'T watch it, dumbass.

Then they posted the impact show on there website. I'm not even gonna comment on that.

Because nothing you say about it wouldn't make a damn bit of sense. It was basically so the people who got shitted on by FSN who wanted to watch it COULD!! Called getting more viewers.

Now in 2006 they are on spike tv. There ratings are the same as they were on fsn.

Highest ratings on Sat. Night that Spike has had. That should say something, even if the ratings themselves were small.

Through out there history tna has tried to bring in old washed up has beens wait no i mean "BIG NAMED STARS" like ddp, nash, hall, hogan to get some fans to watch there "SHOW"(its all high spots people)

They're called hooks, or draws. Maybe you've heard of them. That's why Foley, Hogan, Tatanka, etc., are in the WWE now. Established, big stars that people know and will want to see, and then get them to watch their home-grown stars. It's nothing new.

They have and are wasting there money on these so called stars. thats a cold hard FACT!

I don't know about that. It isn't HURTING them.

They prolly put tna into debt even deeper. tna is not a big enough promotion to pay the salaries that they asked for. TNA is breaking even.

No, I think Jeff Jarret being the TNA champ every single fucking time I turn on my TV to TNA is causing THAT one.

will tna EVER be a major player to WWE? hmmm lets see i think the anwser is NO!

Will this post make my brain hurt. Hmmm, let's see, I think the answer is AW HELL YEAH!!!!

Most of your posts will try to (keyword try) knock wwe and me and praise the little tiny promotion that wont and never will tna. so have fun but deep down im right.

So let me get this straight. You first make no fucking sense to begin with, give me a ton of horse shit about TNA that I cannot read because you didn't play Reader Rabbit Teaches Typing long enough to learn HOW to type, say absolulty NOTHING about how long Jeff Jarrett has been the champion in that promotion (which is a good reason why TNA isn't doing as well as it should and had me wondering why the fuck THAT wasn't in your piss-poor rant), and then, when you say everything, you try to stop people from rebutting and becoming so closed-minded to the issue that you've already "know" what our arguments will be? No wonder your dots are all red.