PDA

View Full Version : How much time off a year does taker have?

Gerard
05-25-2006, 07:05 PM
Just wondering, how many "returns" did he have last year and how many times has he been on smackdown this year? Im starting to wonder if hes even a part of the active roster any more, seems to disappear for ages then show up the smackdown before a ppv for 2 minutes at the end of the show, either wins or gets his ass handed to him at ppv then disappears again. :wtf:
Kane Knight
05-25-2006, 07:49 PM
He's technically on the active roster.
crash99
05-25-2006, 07:50 PM
He doesn't get enough time off.
Kane Knight
05-25-2006, 08:02 PM
I think they should keep him on the active roster and pay him to NOT go to TNA.
Skippord
05-25-2006, 08:04 PM
9 months a year
Kane Knight
05-25-2006, 08:12 PM
Isn't it sad he needs more recovery time than Ric Flair?
6to1
05-25-2006, 08:42 PM
he is worse then hogan
Kane Knight
05-25-2006, 08:51 PM
Mostly because he's alive. Unlike Hogantron 5K.
happylad
05-26-2006, 05:18 AM
:shifty: Just you wait till he gets his new gimmick (yes. I have decided he is getting one wether he likes it or not) he'll probably only have about 2 matches a year then :nono:
Rob
05-26-2006, 06:40 AM
Dude has more holidays than Thomas Cook.
RVDmark
05-26-2006, 09:01 AM
Silly question but why does he have so much time off? I can understand he is old but he could come out and cut a promo or 2, maybe take a bump. but to have teddy long announce that you have challenged Khali just sucked.
Kane Knight
05-26-2006, 09:10 AM
Silly question but why does he have so much time off? I can understand he is old but he could come out and cut a promo or 2, maybe take a bump. but to have teddy long announce that you have challenged Khali just sucked.

Taker doesn't want to tour. He wants a huge check, he just doesn't want to actually do work. He doesn't want to be the Undertaker, either.
RVDmark
05-26-2006, 09:16 AM
How does Mcmahon legitimise paying him so much to do so little? Is takers merch really worth that much?
6to1
05-26-2006, 09:18 AM
Taker doesn't want to tour. He wants a huge check, he just doesn't want to actually do work. He doesn't want to be the Undertaker, either.
so he is kevin nash now
Kane Knight
05-26-2006, 09:20 AM
Minus the torn Quads.
Rob
05-26-2006, 11:16 AM
Plus he can actually have a good match now and then. And he legit puts guys over.
Corkscrewed
05-26-2006, 11:24 AM
Although by "Guys" I think Rob meant Great Khali and Brock Lesnar. :lol:
Rob
05-26-2006, 11:28 AM
If you think losing means putting people over then Rey Misterio must have been a huge ratings draw after beating Kevin Nash.
Innovator
05-26-2006, 01:10 PM
He's rehabbing his back, after trying to carry Khali
Xero
05-26-2006, 01:24 PM
If you think losing means putting people over then Rey Misterio must have been a huge ratings draw after beating Kurt Angle and Randy Orton.
Rob
05-26-2006, 01:36 PM
He's rehabbing his back, after trying to carry Khali

He did a far better job than I could have ever imagined.
Kane Knight
05-26-2006, 02:02 PM
He did a far better job than I could have ever imagined.

I think he outshone everyone's expectations. Given Khali may be the worst hoss I can name, I've got to give him some props. It's just too bad he only seems to put on good amtches when he's "in the mood."
DaveWadding
05-26-2006, 02:15 PM
Taker doesn't want to tour. He wants a huge check, he just doesn't want to actually do work. He doesn't want to be the Undertaker, either.

So what you're saying is: He's the Roger Clemens of the WWE.