Spider-Man 4? [Archive]

Kane Knight

09-04-2006, 04:59 PM

More Spidey To Come

Kevin Feige, the new president of production for Marvel Studios, told MTV.com (http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1538925/story.jhtml) that the upcoming third Spider-Man film won't be the last in the hit franchise.

"There will be many more Spider-Man films to come," Feige promised the site. "We already have stacks of ideas for the next one because of the wealth of stories in the comics. We could be making Spider-Man movies for the next 20 years, based on the 50 years of Spider-Man history we have."

Rumors have circulated that the third movie from director Sam Raimi would be the last. It's unclear whether Spider-Man star Tobey Maguire and his other castmates would sign on for further installments beyond Spider-Man 3.

"When you're concentrating on one movie at a time, there's a beginning and a middle and an end to that process," Feige said. "We've been topping each one as they go, [and if that happens again,] that's the time for those discussions." Spider-Man 3 will open next May.
---

From Sci Fi's news page.

ClockShot

09-04-2006, 08:02 PM

Spider Man 4 in the works.

Villainwise, we got Green Goblin, Dr. Octopus, and soon to be Venom and Sandman out of the way.

They can use:
Hydro-Man
Shocker
Electro
Rhino
Lizard
Green Goblin(Harry Osbourne)
Hobgoblin
Carnage

The list of villians can go on and on, amd intertwine with others heroes from the Marvel Universe. I can picture a Spider-Man 4.

Blitz

09-04-2006, 08:03 PM

Pretty sure they won't blow off Venom after one movie.

YOUR Hero

09-04-2006, 08:16 PM

KingofOldSchool

09-04-2006, 08:18 PM

I want to see a side story with Sin-Eater.

Downunder

09-05-2006, 01:29 AM

The first one was shit, the second one was just as bad, why the hell would they keep making crap for the next 20 years.

Fignuts

09-05-2006, 01:31 AM

Downunder is fucking certifiably infuckingsane.

How the hell were those movies shit?

Fignuts

09-05-2006, 01:33 AM

Tbh, spider-man has a pretty deep rogues gallery, but once you get past those first few they are all pretty much c-list villains, and guys who are generally rather uninteresting. Only ones that interest me on that list are Mysterio and the Lizard.

Kane Knight

09-05-2006, 09:35 AM

Pretty sure they won't blow off Venom after one movie.

On the other hand, since we know HArry's the Goblin in this movie, there's a decent chance we can write him off.

Kalyx triaD

09-05-2006, 11:46 AM

Wanna bet Elektro and Shocker end up in the same movie down the line?

Destor

09-05-2006, 12:05 PM

Wanna bet the don't do shocker?

Kalyx triaD

09-05-2006, 12:22 PM

He can be the comedic Ultimate version while keeping the 616 Elektro. Sounds like now.

Destor

09-05-2006, 12:28 PM

But they wont do it. No main event drawing power between the two. Now if you mean there could be another villian then MAYBE.

samichna

09-05-2006, 12:40 PM

Main event drawing power?

Get the fuck outta here.

Destor

09-05-2006, 12:41 PM

Turn of phase

Rammsteinmad

09-05-2006, 01:07 PM

The Jackal. The Clone Saga. :drool:

Shaggy

09-05-2006, 02:43 PM

I wanna see Shocker...he was my favorite from the TV series

Kane Knight

09-05-2006, 03:12 PM

Wanna bet the don't do shocker?

Raimi wants to do the Sinister 6. Bet on both of them coming in.

Kane Knight

09-05-2006, 03:13 PM

The Jackal. The Clone Saga. :drool:

The Jackal would be awesome. The Clone Saga? Not so sure.

Destor

09-05-2006, 03:16 PM

Shocker was in the origional Sinister Six? I thought he was part of the Sinister Seven?

ClockShot

09-05-2006, 05:19 PM

If I were Toby McGuire, I don't know if I'd go past movie #3. I do believe that being the case, the franchise should still go on without him. There must be a proper, a successful way for them to change the Peter Parker character that is realistic.

One way I can see that getting pulled off is having May "Mayday" Parker getting convieved in #3 and introducing her in #4. Sorta like a passing of the torch.

Kalyx triaD

09-05-2006, 06:26 PM

Spider-Girl... It could pass. But the 'Supergirl' stigma may scare them from an idea like that.

Clone Saga, ha. Imagine it, "Spider-Man: Attack of the Clone".

Kane Knight

09-05-2006, 06:35 PM

Spider-Girl... It could pass. But the 'Supergirl' stigma may scare them from an idea like that.

Or the two existing Spider-Women?

YOUR Hero

09-05-2006, 10:37 PM

The first one was shit, the second one was just as bad, why the hell would they keep making crap for the next 20 years.

I dunno, G they were ok for what they were.

Destor

09-05-2006, 11:11 PM

The first one was shit, the second one was just as bad, why the hell would they keep making crap for the next 20 years.Maybe because of the insane ammount of money they make?

Shaved Monkey

09-06-2006, 12:41 AM

I'd still like to see Kraven the Hunter.

Kane Knight

09-06-2006, 09:28 AM

Maybe because of the insane ammount of money they make?

Shhh...That's our little secret.

Downunder

09-06-2006, 10:34 AM

I dunno, G they were ok for what they were.

Superman was ok for what it was, Batman version 2 was ok for what it was. X-Men are awesome movies - Spiderman movies are just shitty comic book super heros movies. I put them in the same league as Daredevil (one of my all time favourite characters that they totally fucked up), The Phantom and Judge Dredd.

Fignuts

09-07-2006, 12:56 AM

Kraven if done properly could be awesome. Same goes for the lizard. Mysterio gives you hundreds of possibilities. Electro is just a guy who can use electricity. If you think about it we've seen similar powers in all kinds of movies for years. Add that the character has zero depth. He's essentially just a bank robber. I can see them throwing him in there in the sinister six movie(if it happens) just to complete the group.

Rammsteinveryperturbed, you should be slapped in the mouth with a cobra for showing excitment for a clone saga movie.

Fignuts

09-07-2006, 12:58 AM

Superman was ok for what it was, Batman version 2 was ok for what it was. X-Men are awesome movies - Spiderman movies are just shitty comic book super heros movies. I put them in the same league as Daredevil (one of my all time favourite characters that they totally fucked up), The Phantom and Judge Dredd.

That really doesn't elaborate at all, on your previous statement.

Downunder

09-07-2006, 01:33 AM

My point is Figgy, there are super hero movies made that were good, and done well - Spiderman is not one of them.

Destor

09-07-2006, 01:52 AM

My point: Hollywood could give two shits about qaulity as long as it draws.

Rammsteinmad

09-07-2006, 01:54 AM

Rammsteinveryperturbed, you should be slapped in the mouth with a cobra for showing excitment for a clone saga movie.

I take it you never read any of the clone saga stuff then? That was some really great exciting stuff!

I know for a fact that it wouldn't work as a movie, and that The Jackal isn't really a big name, but one can dream right?

Downunder

09-07-2006, 06:48 AM

My point: Hollywood could give two shits about qaulity as long as it draws.

No question.

They pander to the lowest common denominator.

Kane Knight

09-07-2006, 08:36 AM

My point is Figgy, there are super hero movies made that were good, and done well - Spiderman is not one of them.

As long as Spider-Man is a box officer smash, then it doens't matter if you like it.

Fignuts

09-07-2006, 09:33 AM

My point is Figgy, there are super hero movies made that were good, and done well - Spiderman is not one of them.

I understand that you don't think the movie was done well. Obviously you wouldn't call it shitty if you thought otherwise.

I am wondering WHY you thought it wasn't well done.

Fignuts

09-07-2006, 09:36 AM

Rammsteinslightlyannoyed, clearly, I wouldn't suggest such a brutal punishment on someone for suggesting a movie adaptation, without having read the source material first.

Kane Knight

09-07-2006, 09:42 AM

I understand that you don't think the movie was done well. Obviously you wouldn't call it shitty if you thought otherwise.

I am wondering WHY you thought it wasn't well done.

I dunno, maybe it's the fact that Spider-Man's a little too CRAAAAAAAAAWLING IIIIIIIIIIIIIIN MY SKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN or something.

YOUR Hero

09-07-2006, 08:52 PM

agree to disagree with my Aussie bro', Gareth on this one. I've liked the SpiderMan movies. Not as much as the X-Men movies or that new Batman one, but I was enjoyed them. Funny, I've not seen that new SuperMan one.

MVP

09-07-2006, 09:23 PM

Tobey Maguire is pretty much known as the guy who plays Spiderman, why not keep going with it. Pierce Brosnan did like 5 Bond films.

ClockShot

09-07-2006, 09:28 PM

Tobey Maguire is pretty much known as the guy who plays Spiderman, why not keep going with it. Pierce Brosnan did like 5 Bond films.

Pierce Brosnan did 4 films. He was lined up to do the new one. But he got dumped practically at the last minute.

YOUR Hero

09-08-2006, 09:42 AM

Tobey Maguire is pretty much known as the guy who plays Spiderman, why not keep going with it. Pierce Brosnan did like 5 Bond films.

I'm not right in the loop on these things, but I was pretty sure I read somewhere that Tobey didn't want to do anymore past 3. If that is correct, for the series to continue, they'd need to put some sort of storyline (IMO) to shift from one character playing Spidey to the next. I have a real problem of seeing one character play a role and then come the next movie it's someone else.

Savio

09-08-2006, 09:58 AM

Kalyx triaD

09-08-2006, 11:42 AM

I have a real problem of seeing one character play a role and then come the next movie it's someone else.

Yeah, the adjustment takes away from the film/series. I don't know how I'm gonna get through Casino Royale with a clear head.

Rammsteinmad

09-08-2006, 11:58 AM

Do the clone saga... introduce Ben Reilly... sorted.

Kane Knight

09-08-2006, 12:14 PM

I'm not right in the loop on these things, but I was pretty sure I read somewhere that Tobey didn't want to do anymore past 3. If that is correct, for the series to continue, they'd need to put some sort of storyline (IMO) to shift from one character playing Spidey to the next. I have a real problem of seeing one character play a role and then come the next movie it's someone else.

Have it take place a couple years later, grab someone slightly older.

Kane Knight

09-08-2006, 12:16 PM

Do the clone saga... introduce Ben Reilly... TANKED.

Kalyx triaD

09-08-2006, 12:18 PM

Move into the portion of Peter's life when he's a college professor. Could work.

Downunder

09-08-2006, 06:45 PM

I understand that you don't think the movie was done well. Obviously you wouldn't call it shitty if you thought otherwise.

I am wondering WHY you thought it wasn't well done.

I found both story lines really boring, the second one moreso than the first, and I don't think Jerry Maguire can act his way out of a wet paper bag. The only thing that saved the first one was Willem Dafoe.

ClockShot

09-08-2006, 10:13 PM

I found both story lines really boring, the second one moreso than the first, and I don't think Jerry Maguire can act his way out of a wet paper bag.

I didn't know a sports agent became a super hero. Then again I guess Drew Rosenhaus counts.