View Full Version : Eddie as the number 1 contender
the wwe champion
01-05-2007, 04:32 AM
How did Eddie Guerrero become the number 1 contender for the wwe title
back in 2004?
ddpBANG
01-05-2007, 05:52 AM
We won a SmackDown! battle royal.
M-A-G
01-05-2007, 06:31 AM
Think of it as a mini-Royal Rumble with only 15 wrestlers instead of 30 but under the same rules. Eddie eliminated Kurt Angle last to win.
We won a SmackDown! battle royal.
We did? I don't even remember it!
Disturbed316
01-05-2007, 10:18 AM
You dont? That was one of the highlights of our career.
Oh, wait, was that when TPWW invaded SmackDown! and declared war on the booking team? Cause that's always a blur to me.
ddpBANG
01-05-2007, 06:09 PM
Jeez, Xero, can't you remember shit?
M-A-G
01-05-2007, 06:11 PM
I tragically was not part of our victory. :(
Jeez, Xero, can't you remember shit?
Let's just say I ran into RVD that day. :shifty:
ddpBANG
01-05-2007, 06:43 PM
Speaking of RVD, have you read his homepage recently?
http://robvandam.com/
Disturbed316
01-05-2007, 06:59 PM
Congrats to AMW for capturing 914 scum bags. Even if you are a fan of mine, if you are murdering people, fucking little kids, or violently robbing victims of their shit…you are a scum bag and I hope to see you on America’s Most Wanted. There I go skating that line again.
rofl
Impact!
01-05-2007, 10:18 PM
anyway, I often hear people compare tobacco to the good herb. Here’s a fact for you, my gift to you if you don’t already have it. If you were to experience a lethal overdose from cannabis, you would be the first in the recorded history of the world. This is not, by the way, a challenge!
heh
the wwe champion
01-06-2007, 03:51 AM
thank you all for replying.
Jonster
01-07-2007, 11:39 AM
You're welcome.
M-A-G
01-07-2007, 11:41 AM
I feel like repping you for actually using 'you're' the right way.
M-A-G
01-07-2007, 11:41 AM
And while we're on the subject, it's not 'should of', it's SHOULD'VE! :mad:
Jonster
01-07-2007, 11:46 AM
I always grammar good. :)
M-A-G
01-07-2007, 11:48 AM
Talk good American.
Jonster
01-07-2007, 11:51 AM
And while we're on the subject, it's not 'should of', it's SHOULD'VE! :mad:
^ this.
I forgot to mention it.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.