El Fangel
04-13-2007, 10:42 PM
I have thought about this, and would like to hear your thoughts on it. Ok as you all know the MITB Ladder match has several younger (usually), upper level mid-carders. Who compete to grab a briefcase with a contract giving them the right to challenge any champ at anytime within the next year. Well as you know every person who has won this match so far has won the title when they cashed in thier contract, But this is a chance that the MITB winner takes. They have to have the odds in thier favor before they cash it in, and even still there is a chance that they will not succeed.
My Idea is, that since over the past 5 years, they have not defended the IC title at Wrestlemania, they should include it in the match, along with the briefcase. And whoever climbs up has a choice.
1) The Title and a sure thing as a 2nd rung champion
2) Or a chance at the big-time, which may not happen.
What you could also do is that once they have chosen they have to take thier prize and sit out of the match for a certain amount of time (Kind of like the KOTM match in TNA). And after that time is up, they can return to try for the prize they didn't pick.
Also I was thinking of another variant to this match.
Have the IC, US, and if it happens the TV title all be defended in the MITB.
Now before you jump to conclussions calling me crazy for tying up 3 titles in one match. Hear me out.
Its money in the bank, and the 3 titles on the line. As like before, the first person up has a choice. 1 of the 3 titles, and a chance to jump ship to that respective show. Or the MITB, returning to thier normal show with a chance at the champion of any brand. This would give some people a way to get off a show and onto another.
The way this should be set up is
IC Titlist
#1 Contender
US Titlist
#1 Contender
TV Titlist
#1 Contender
Then have (2) 3-way matches for a wildcard spot with 1 person from each show.
So what happens, is that say the former IC titlist claims the US title, making the US Champion have to go to Raw unless, he claims the MITB, or the TV Title. The wildcarders if they don't win have the choice of going to any show should they not win.
What do you people think of this?
My Idea is, that since over the past 5 years, they have not defended the IC title at Wrestlemania, they should include it in the match, along with the briefcase. And whoever climbs up has a choice.
1) The Title and a sure thing as a 2nd rung champion
2) Or a chance at the big-time, which may not happen.
What you could also do is that once they have chosen they have to take thier prize and sit out of the match for a certain amount of time (Kind of like the KOTM match in TNA). And after that time is up, they can return to try for the prize they didn't pick.
Also I was thinking of another variant to this match.
Have the IC, US, and if it happens the TV title all be defended in the MITB.
Now before you jump to conclussions calling me crazy for tying up 3 titles in one match. Hear me out.
Its money in the bank, and the 3 titles on the line. As like before, the first person up has a choice. 1 of the 3 titles, and a chance to jump ship to that respective show. Or the MITB, returning to thier normal show with a chance at the champion of any brand. This would give some people a way to get off a show and onto another.
The way this should be set up is
IC Titlist
#1 Contender
US Titlist
#1 Contender
TV Titlist
#1 Contender
Then have (2) 3-way matches for a wildcard spot with 1 person from each show.
So what happens, is that say the former IC titlist claims the US title, making the US Champion have to go to Raw unless, he claims the MITB, or the TV Title. The wildcarders if they don't win have the choice of going to any show should they not win.
What do you people think of this?