Anyone else dissapointed by the WWE recently? [Archive]

View Full Version : Anyone else dissapointed by the WWE recently?

TerryBoulder

11-08-2007, 05:42 PM

I don't know if anyone here will share my feelings, but I think that the WWE has recently been one huge disappointment after another! :n:

First, we have a promising angle of a lost McMahon son, which I thought would be awesome and it ends up being Hornswoggle? :n: :n: :mad: :n: :n: That is the STUPIDEST outcome to a storyline that I have seen in years of watching wrestling. Out of all the people on the roster, out of all possible people in the wrestling industry, it turns out to be the worst possible choice, Hornswoggle. WWE just took a potential huge money maker angle and drained it down the toilet. WWE basically threw away the potential money to be made on this and not only that, but it spit in the face of loyal fans for yet another time. :foc:

Now wonder the ratings are going down!

But that's not the only disappointment in the wwe recently. We had a promising new opportunity for a fresh start on Smackdown and WWE chose to go with...THE GREAT KHALI? :n: :n: :n: Out of the whole roster, this is ONE man that should have been fired before he debuted. There is no worth to him and the mere fact that he held the world devalues it to a new low. Thankfully WWE came to their senses and ended this tirade of disappointment and gave the title to a great "new generation" superstar, Batista.

But wait! WWE can't wait to disappont us again. Now, I know, a lot of fans are glad that a new generation wrestler like BATISTA :y: is champ again on Smackdown, so I have a feeling WWE is cooking up another disappointment in the form of The Undertaker. :n: Come on. The Undertaker? The guy is way too old to be getting into the ring! He should go into announcing or something like JBL. His time has passed, he is an old man and should NOT be stealing the spotlight of new generation stars like John Cena or Batista. :y:

Speaking of which, this reminds me of another disappointment. Undertaker beating Batista clean at Wrestlemania. :n: I know, I know, streak, but still, you know what this did? It just made Batista look like CRAP and an old guy that should be retired made to look better than him. No ones buying it, Taker should just retire already, GAH, I'm so sick of him hogging the main event and getting wins over guys like Batista. If they wanted to have Taker win at Wrestlemania, why not pair him off with ANOTHER old clod like Mark Henry instead of DAMAGING the career of a new generation wrestler like Batista!

It makes no sense and it has been incredibly dissapointing how WWE has been booking lately.

I am sure a lot of you will agree that WWE needs to end the Undertaker/Batista feud by having Batista completely destroy the Undertaker and cement himself as "The Man" and Undertaker should take time off or preferably retire. Also, He should take Mark Henry with him. There is no point to having that CLOD Mark Henry on the damn show! He is useless. :n: :n:

I mean, WWE fires Chris Masters and keeps Mark Henry? MIND BOGGLING! Chris Masters was a fresh character with TONS of potential and WWE goes and fires him and MARK HENRY????? :n: :n: is still on the roster! We all know what Mark Henry can do, Hint : CRAP! and hopefully Chris Masters will return and get a good push some time after WWE comes to their senses.:y:

Now it seems I am focusing on Smackdown too much and I am, because that show's main event scene, sans Batista, is crap. I really hope WWE sends Bobby Lashley :y: to Smackdown when he comes back because Smackdown really needs fresh new stars.

Now on Raw, things are better if you ignore the terrible nonsense of Hornswoggle being revealed as Vince's son.

Of course, you got Jericho coming back...but you know what, Save Us should NOT be Jericho. Its such a good build up and something that can elevate a new young star that I think it should be used for something new, something fresh. Jericho doesnt need this build up, everyone knows who he is, and he will get a good reaction regardless of what WWE does...so they should use it on someone fresh and new. But I think its just going to be another dissapointment when Jericho comes out.

The only good thing about it is that it boosts Raw which has been in a decline ever since John Cena and Bobby Lashley got injured. The show has no direction. Randy Orton is a decent champ, but he is no John Cena. At least WWE has been bringing back Austin which is great, but its a short term fix. Now, Raw is pretty fine compared to Smackdown so I'll give WWE that, but they really need to work on Smackdown and to get rid of all these disappontments.

Lets just hope WWE doesnt screw up the Blue Show too by having Oldertaker win the gold. Gah.

Comments? I'm free to hear what u gotta say!!!!

:wave:

Mercury Bullet

11-08-2007, 05:57 PM

Have you read any other posts on this forum...?

Then you would know that absolutely nobody here is displeased with wrestling the slightest bit. It's a bit of a wonderland really...

Crossrine

11-08-2007, 06:29 PM

Its your first couple days here, and I've been in your spot. Let me give you some advice, dont make any thread until you have an idea of what the hell goes on around here. This is total anarchy compared to the "WWE Chat Rooms" so like I said, dont act stupid and gradually people will accept you.

And if you do act stupid then apologize

Nark Order

11-08-2007, 06:37 PM

And anymore emoticons will surely be the death of you.

If not, I will make it so.

Xero

11-08-2007, 06:47 PM

Going to assume there's something about Val Venis winning a title in there.

94 SVT Cobra

11-08-2007, 06:59 PM

very good chance there is something about val winning a title in there, anybody actually read it?

Lord-Of-Darkness

11-08-2007, 07:12 PM

I caught Batista is the future and being held back by the Undertaker. Chris Masters shouldn't have been fired because he had TONS of potential. Bobby Lashley is a rising star. Save_us should NOT be Jericho. And Orton is a decent champ, but hes no John Cena.

Yeah that sums it up.

Savio

11-08-2007, 07:14 PM

Batista is 40

Mercury Bullet

11-08-2007, 07:16 PM

Batista is the future...

Of the Resthome Wrestling Federation.

Xero

11-08-2007, 07:16 PM

LOL at Lashley being a positive factor in the ratings.

Fresh character for Masters? Did you ever hear of "The Narcissists"?

Comparing Masters and Henry is like deciding whether you want to be vomited on (Masters) or shit on (Henry). Either way it's going to be REALLY unpleasant but I think, forcibly given the choice, most would take vomit.

Xero

11-08-2007, 07:17 PM

Batista is 40
He'll be the new Hulk Hogan within ten years without all that pesky decades of build.

Crossrine

11-08-2007, 07:17 PM

Have mercy the guy cant be older than 12

Xero

11-08-2007, 07:19 PM

Wow, I knew I'd heard that name before. His name is one of Hogan's first gimmicks...

Lord-Of-Darkness

11-08-2007, 07:20 PM

Have mercy the guy cant be older than 12

http://www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/pictures/m/mickfoley/17.jpg

OOOOWWW, HAVE MERCY!

BigDaddyCool

11-08-2007, 07:30 PM

Have you read any other <s>posts on this forum...?</s> thing of the internet?

Xero

11-08-2007, 07:32 PM

Disappointed by WWE - 300,000 hits on Google.

But no one's ever been disappointed by WWE.

Kane Knight

11-08-2007, 07:59 PM

*post*

Lord-Of-Darkness

11-08-2007, 07:59 PM

*postal strike*

Mercury Bullet

11-08-2007, 08:02 PM

*going postal*

FourFifty

11-08-2007, 08:22 PM

I didn't read anything in this thread, but this thread pisses me off.
Please read Rule 85 in the ICW Rulebook.

Rule 85- You do not need to read one letter in a thread in order to get pissed off over what's in the thread.

Kane Knight

11-08-2007, 08:29 PM

I'm kind of thinking Heyman alt, but I don't really have the attention span to try and back that up right now.

TerranRich

11-08-2007, 09:38 PM

I love wrestling! I watch it all the time!

FOOEY ON YOU, TERRY BOULDER, FOR SAYING ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT WRESTLING!!!

:n::n::n::y::y::y::yes::nono::foc:

Shadow

11-09-2007, 12:23 AM

I hope he's a sock...otherwise this is just sad.

Sadder then when I first starting posting here.

Mister Sinister

11-09-2007, 01:56 AM

Sadder, then the one time I got pot from you, and it ended up being an bag of dog shit....I still demend my refund.

Skippord

11-09-2007, 02:41 AM

Definitely a sock

or Batista

Lux

11-09-2007, 04:49 AM

I hope he's a sock...otherwise this is just sad.
If this guy isn't a sock he should be shot :mad: yea i'm mad today

ddpBANG

11-09-2007, 05:07 AM

I LOVE Double Double E

Avenger

11-09-2007, 06:19 AM

Have you read any other posts on this forum...?

Then you would know that absolutely nobody here is displeased with wrestling the slightest bit. It's a bit of a wonderland really...lol that is probably one of the gayest things I've ever heard.

:roll:

Skull316

11-09-2007, 11:48 AM

Kane Knight

11-09-2007, 12:42 PM

Mercury Bullet

11-09-2007, 12:45 PM

lol that is probably one of the gayest things I've ever heard.

:roll:

Glad I could do that for ya :y:

Kane Knight

11-09-2007, 04:17 PM

Hey, if you're doing gay things for people...

...

...

...

...Shadow could probably use some action.

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 05:13 PM

You know, I didn't even have to get through half of your post before I saw that you were saying John Cena and Batista are huge stars and the future of the company, and right there you completely destroyed any credibility you could have ever had on this forum. Congratulations!

LOL! :lol:

John Cena and Batista not the future of the company/huge stars to build around? :rofl:

Have u been UNDER A ROCK for the past several years? Cena and Batista have been the top dogs for a while now. Cena and Batista is synchronous to The Rock and Stone Cold of the 90's or Hulk Hogan and Ultimate Warrior of the past. These guys are here to stay and they DEFINE this generations and will continue to define it for the future.

The only reason Cena isnt still champ is because he got injured. I know u are all jealous of Batista and Cena but come on, see the truth! These guys are going to continue to be on top of the company because face it, there aint nobody better to headline the company than Cena or Batista. I mean, who will use? Big FATTY V? Dont make me laugh!

And as far as me being "12" Well LOOK who is acting 12 here, it isnt me, its guys who are calling me socks and SPAMMING my thread!

Youre the immature little kids from 8th grade who are ruining a normal mature discussion. If u have nothing to say then DONT SAY ANYTHING! :rant:

Xero

11-09-2007, 05:18 PM

YAH! U DUN SAY NETING!

Also, ROFL at us being jealous of Batista and Cena.

Who could they use? MVP. Punk. Jericho. Kennedy. Matt Hardy. Take your pick over Batista.

Really, I do believe in Cena's abilities, he just has shit writing - he should have been turned heel two years ago. Batista, though, is pretty fucking terrible. Only thing he has going for him is his dancing.

Kane Knight

11-09-2007, 05:21 PM

LOL! :lol:

John Cena and Batista not the future of the company/huge stars to build around? :rofl:

Have u been UNDER A ROCK for the past several years? Cena and Batista have been the top dogs for a while now. Cena and Batista is synchronous to The Rock and Stone Cold of the 90's or Hulk Hogan and Ultimate Warrior of the past. These guys are here to stay and they DEFINE this generations and will continue to define it for the future.

The only reason Cena isnt still champ is because he got injured. I know u are all jealous of Batista and Cena but come on, see the truth! These guys are going to continue to be on top of the company because face it, there aint nobody better to headline the company than Cena or Batista. I mean, who will use? Big FATTY V? Dont make me laugh!

And as far as me being "12" Well LOOK who is acting 12 here, it isnt me, its guys who are calling me socks and SPAMMING my thread!

Youre the immature little kids from 8th grade who are ruining a normal mature discussion. If u have nothing to say then DONT SAY ANYTHING! :rant:

So basically, your gimmick is that you are a huge mark who believes wrestling is real, or...?

Because I can't see where being on top matters in a fake sport. Batista's one injury away from a wheelchair, and Cena tanks ratings.

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 05:23 PM

YAH! U DUN SAY NETING!

Also, ROFL at us being jealous of Batista and Cena.

Who could they use? MVP. Punk. Jericho. Kennedy.

But really, I do believe in Cena's abilities, he just has shit writing. Batista, though, is pretty fucking terrible. Only thing he has going for him is his dancing.

LOL.

Batita is a great wrestler he has had some great classics through his career so far. The guy knows how to get it done. And of course u nerds are probably jealous of Cena and Batista because they are fantastic succesfull wrestlers livin their dreams and they get all the chicks that u never could have dreamed of.

As far as ur alternatives, MVP is okay but he needs a better outfit, he looks like a power ranger. Punk is incredibly boring, but has potential. Kennedy is great and so is Jericho but, REMEMBER, Jericho hasnt been wrestling for YEARS. He needs some practice cause hes been out of tune with the biz so to speak. Also, Punk, MVP and Kennedy are merely OK, they dont have that superstar skill that Batista and Cena do. You can build a company around a man like Batista or a man like Cena because they draw crowds of fans. You cant build a company around MVP, Punk or Kennedy because they just arent in that league.

COULD THEY BE?

Sure! But they need to work on themselves first and develop more.

Xero

11-09-2007, 05:27 PM

Batista is a shit wrestler - his ONLY good match was with Taker at Mania, and that was all on Taker. He's a terrible promo too.

Cena, with the right writing I don't doubt could carry WWE. Batista, fuck no. Batista is an overpushed douchebag who gets over because he's big. Too bad, unlike guys like Taker, he can't do much good.

Xero

11-09-2007, 05:27 PM

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 05:29 PM

So basically, your gimmick is that you are a huge mark who believes wrestling is real, or...?

Because I can't see where being on top matters in a fake sport. Batista's one injury away from a wheelchair, and Cena tanks ratings.

My "gimmick" is that I post the truth and if you cant realize that, TOUGH.

Batista is a shit wrestler - his ONLY good match was with Taker at Mania, and that was all on Taker. He's a terrible promo too.

Batista had great matches with Taker, who is an old man so Batista did a good job there. He also had great matches with Triple H and even that huge turd Mark Henry.

Xero

11-09-2007, 05:33 PM

11-09-2007, 05:35 PM

This thread is the equivalent of me walking into a black man's house and telling him that I have issues with the KKK.

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 05:38 PM

I was waiting for you to bring up age. Batista is only about 5 years younger than Taker.

Also, great on adding ANOTHER wrestler (Triple H) who can get a good match out of a lot of people.

Henry, though? :rofl:

HEY GUYS! HE THINKS A MARK HENRY MATCH WAS GREAT!

Thats the point, Batista CARRIED A PIECE OF CRAP like Mark Henry to a great match. Only a real pro can do that.

As far as age, maybe Batista is just a bit younger than Taker, but your numeric age is not always your physical age.

Batista is in great shape, he looks very young while Undertaker is in terrible shape he looks like an old man from a retirement home.

Thus, Undertaker is OLD at heart and anyone who sees Taker immediately sees how he moves and that he is old. With Batista though? People are SHOCKED that he is as old as he is because he acts and looks so young, so its not about ur numeric age, its about ur physical age and in that respect, the difference between Batista and The Undertaker is HUGE.

Xero

11-09-2007, 05:42 PM

11-09-2007, 05:43 PM

Thats the point, Batista CARRIED A PIECE OF CRAP like Mark Henry to a great match. Only a real pro can do that.

As far as age, maybe Batista is just a bit younger than Taker, but your numeric age is not always your physical age.

Batista is in great shape, he looks very young while Undertaker is in terrible shape he looks like an old man from a retirement home.

Thus, Undertaker is OLD at heart and anyone who sees Taker immediately sees how he moves and that he is old. With Batista though? People are SHOCKED that he is as old as he is because he acts and looks so young, so its not about ur numeric age, its about ur physical age and in that respect, the difference between Batista and The Undertaker is HUGE.

I'm deciding if I should say anything to you, but you see like a troll so I will continue just watching this trainwreck of a thread with annoying comments here and there.

Kane Knight

11-09-2007, 05:44 PM

My "gimmick" is that I post the truth and if you cant realize that, TOUGH.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

This is too good.

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 05:46 PM

Taker is in MUCH better shape than Batista. Taker's had what, ONE big injury in a 20 year career? Batista has had at least two within 4 years.

Just because you're roided up and have the body of a body builder doesn't automatically make you in better physical shape.

How many INJURIES u get doesnt show what shape ur in. What are injuries? INJURIES ARE ACCIDENTS! And GUESS WHAT

*Spoiler* Batista is much less experienced than Undertaker in the ring, so he makes more mistakes!

It has nothing to do with how old he is, but it is his experience. Taker just has more thats why he doesnt get injured as much.

11-09-2007, 05:46 PM

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 05:48 PM

BTW, you know what would be AWESOME!!!111 A match with batista, henry, and for one night only bring back Hogan and Ultimate Warrior for a 4-Way Elimination match. let it go on 4 too hours and id be beyond cool bro.

4 realz!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111

Are you MENTALLY RETARDED?

Oh wait yes you are, LOL, :rofl:

Henry is crap, Hogan is an old man, Warrior is an old man. Batista can carry Henry to a good match with his skill, but not all these turds. UGH.

Xero

11-09-2007, 05:50 PM

BTW, you know what would be AWESOME!!!111 A match with batista, henry, and for one night only bring back Hogan and Ultimate Warrior for a 4-Way Elimination match. let it go on 4 too hours and id be beyond cool bro.

4 realz!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111
Noez! U NO WHAT WOLD BE MUR ASME? BATSIZAS VZ HOGANZ VZ KHALIZ IN A LOSER LEEVES EARTH MATH!

Xero

11-09-2007, 05:53 PM

"Anyone else... 11-09-2007 05:51 PM TerryBoulder Dont post CRAP in my thread plz u elementary school KID."

lol

Also, at least I passed first grade English class.

Kane Knight

11-09-2007, 05:54 PM

How many INJURIES u get doesnt show what shape ur in. What are injuries? INJURIES ARE ACCIDENTS! And GUESS WHAT

*Spoiler* Batista is much less experienced than Undertaker in the ring, so he makes more mistakes!

It has nothing to do with how old he is, but it is his experience. Taker just has more thats why he doesnt get injured as much.

Okay, I'll play along:

But Taker wasn't seriously injured until recently, meaning he made a mistake as an experienced man! So clearly, since Taker managed to get through his early years, those analogous to Dancin' Dave's current status, without injuries. Are you saying he was a better wrestler than Bats?

Probably not, but that's where your circular logic leads.

Well, if you can call what you're using logic.

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 05:55 PM

"Anyone else... 11-09-2007 05:51 PM TerryBoulder Dont post CRAP in my thread plz u elementary school KID."

lol

Also, at least I passed first grade English class.

Well ur the one putting crap in my thread. If U dont agree with me and cant argue my points maybe u should post somewhere else.

Xero

11-09-2007, 05:57 PM

I am arguing your points. And you just bring up more stupid counter points. It's not worth it.

Also, TPWW is notorious for thread hijacking. I take it you didn't read the forum before you joined... You don't know what you're into.

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 05:59 PM

Okay, I'll play along:

But Taker wasn't seriously injured until recently, meaning he made a mistake as an experienced man! So clearly, since Taker managed to get through his early years, those analogous to Dancin' Dave's current status, without injuries. Are you saying he was a better wrestler than Bats?

Probably not, but that's where your circular logic leads.

Well, if you can call what you're using logic.

I believe Undertaker had injuries before, but I did not watch him when he was young, but what I DO know is that wrestling style back then was completely different from today! Now its all high paced and extreme and risky, back then it was mostly on the mat and there wasnt much risk involved. Thus, it wasnt that Taker didnt get injured because he was "better", its just that the style was very minimal risk and thats why he didnt get injured as much.

Hey, if Batista started around the same time as Taker he wouldnt have been injured either because it was a very low risk enviroment and style.

I dont know if Taker was a better wrestler than Batista, its hard to compare because I have not seen much of Young Taker's work (since it was such a long time ago), but I am talking that today, Batista is the better wrestler because Taker is marred down.

Xero

11-09-2007, 06:00 PM

So essentially Taker sucks because he wrestles a different style. Nice.

11-09-2007, 06:08 PM

Are you MENTALLY RETARDED?

Oh wait yes you are, LOL, :rofl:

Henry is crap, Hogan is an old man, Warrior is an old man. Batista can carry Henry to a good match with his skill, but not all these turds. UGH.

No, YOUR WRONG MANZ!!! Batista can do it allz and he'll do it while fucking 3 girls with once because no woman con turn dawn Batista. He's use his whole movezlist too...give a power bomb heres, a spine buster here, then a punch and a punch and another spinbuster, then three more kicks and a power bomb...and hee's doez that for like FOR HOURZ MANZ!!!111111111111

I'd bee sick!!!1111 SICQQQQQQQQQQQ!!!!1111111111111111111

Kane Knight

11-09-2007, 06:10 PM

I believe Undertaker had injuries before

Nowhere near as serious as the ones BAtista's suffered in a short time.

but what I DO know is that wrestling style back then was completely different from today! Now its all high paced and extreme and risky, back then it was mostly on the mat and there wasnt much risk involved.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

(deep breath)

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Ummm...Sorry, what?

Now its all high paced and extreme and risky, back then it was mostly on the mat and there wasnt much risk involved.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I'm better now.

Really.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Sorry, that's just too funny.

Taker used to be in matches with powerbombs and piledrivers and wrestling that was about fifteen times as stiff as WWE is now. It wasn't even the hardest wrestling around: WCW and ECW had much stiffer wrestling. But it was sure as fuck harder than the shit today.

I know you're a joke account, so I'll just take this for what it's worth:

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 06:13 PM

So essentially Taker sucks because he wrestles a different style. Nice.

That is NOT what I said. I said that Taker isnt good anymore because his age has caught up with him. Its simple!

TerryBoulder

11-09-2007, 06:16 PM

Nowhere near as serious as the ones BAtista's suffered in a short time.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

(deep breath)

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Ummm...Sorry, what?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I'm better now.

Really.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Sorry, that's just too funny.

Taker used to be in matches with powerbombs and piledrivers and wrestling that was about fifteen times as stiff as WWE is now. It wasn't even the hardest wrestling around: WCW and ECW had much stiffer wrestling. But it was sure as fuck harder than the shit today.

I know you're a joke account, so I'll just take this for what it's worth:

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

EXCUSE ME?

I'm talking about Taker's EARLY years. NOT, his later years when things like ECW and such became common which was in the 90's. Im talking 80's and older then that when all u had is very mat oriented action. Thats way before ECW even existed and this whole "Extreme, Attitude" style appeared.

Xero

11-09-2007, 06:26 PM

Taker debuted in WWE in 91. The bulk of his career happened in the hard hitting era.

That is NOT what I said. I said that Taker isnt good anymore because his age has caught up with him. Its simple!
I have to disagree here. Taker has been solid for the past few years. He slacked up a bit after he returned as the Deadman at Mania 20, but he's now constantly putting on very decent matches. Michaels/Taker at the Rumble was VERY well done. And, UH OH! They're both pretty old!

By your logic an old man can't carry someone else - physically or otherwise. So what about here? Michaels isn't in the best shape of his life, and apparently Taker is in the WORST shape (which is not true, he's probably in the best shape of his career). How did they manage to pull off one of the best Rumble finishes ever?

Oh, I know, Batista carried them.

Mister Sinister

11-09-2007, 06:30 PM

Wait, Mark Henry matches aren't great?

FourFifty

11-09-2007, 06:33 PM

Blah blah blah blah
I enjoy the taste of penis in my mouth, I hate the Kliq, and feed aborted babies to Mark Henry

Kane Knight

11-09-2007, 06:36 PM

Taker debuted in WWE in 91. The bulk of his career happened in the hard hitting era.

And even in 91, wrestling was stiffer.

But we won't let reality get in the way of our argument, will we, Terry?

Mercury Bullet

11-09-2007, 07:10 PM

This thread is priceless.

Crossrine

11-09-2007, 09:39 PM

Originally posted by TerryBoulder
Are you MENTALLY RETARDED?

Oh wait yes you are, LOL,

Henry is crap, Hogan is an old man, Warrior is an old man. Batista can carry Henry to a good match with his skill, but not all these turds. UGH.

You fucking fool, you did not heed my warning.. May the Kliq have mercy on you

Shadow

11-10-2007, 12:50 AM

Hey, if you're doing gay things for people...

...

...

...

...Shadow could probably use some action.

WHAT THE HELL MAN!? WHAT THE HELL!?

BlackDawn2024

11-10-2007, 01:32 AM

Anyone else disappointed by this thread recently? I think most of you have been too easy on him. I know I'm just a lowly mid-carder, but come on.

Lord-Of-Darkness

11-10-2007, 06:58 AM

Taker debuted in WWE in 91.

1990. Just for the hell of making a markish point.

What the hell with this guy though. He's arguing with his own logic really.

Oh btw, back to his point about MVPs attire, MVP made a good point about that in an interview not so long ago when he said something along the lines of 'There are sweaty guys out there rolling around in speedos, and people are concerned with my attire?'

Tommy Gunn

11-10-2007, 11:51 AM

I've been disappointed with the WWE for years and years and years. But then again, I'm British, so I'd be disappointed if I WASN'T disappointed. We Brits like to be let down so we have something to talk about at the pub.

11-10-2007, 06:18 PM

Anyone else disappointed by this thread recently? I think most of you have been too easy on him. I know I'm just a lowly mid-carder, but come on.

I'll tell you what, next time he comes on I'll call you so you can show us how to flame him right. Just give me your phone number <s>so I can post it on 4Chan</s>.