Loose Cannon
11-13-2007, 01:32 PM
to a degree..
Let me explain.
True wrestling and wrestling feuds to me involve a good guy and bad guy. They talk bad about each other, get into fights and have a match. Pretty simple booking for wrestling. And you see a lot of this right now. It's all very bland and not much behind storylines.
When I've enjoyed watching wrestling the most to where I couldn't stop talking about it and couldn't wait for next weeks show right afyer Raw ended was times like
The Canada/USA war
Higher Power
nWo
DX takeover of WCW
Kane/Taker in the beginning
Bret/Owen
Jake/Macho
Dusty/Horsemen.
Austin/Pillman
Sting/Flair (early 90's)
Austin/Corporation (Rock, Vince)
These storylines weren't just about a guy winning a match and then getting a Title shot. They weren't just about a guy hating another guy just because they are sceduled to have a match. They weren't about said wrestler attacking the champ from behind one night and now there's a feud. There was more behind them. A lot more. Wrestling wasn't the focal point. Titles weren't the focal point. The wrestlers were fighting for a lot more then just to win a match or a title.
I'm just not seeing these kinds of stories anymore. And that's why I don't enjoy it as much. The whole Jericho comeback got me thinking about this. Sure, he'll come in and get a nice pop, he'll challenge somebody and soon get a Title shot. ok..and? I've seen that a thousand times before.
I need more then just guys fighting for respect, fighting to get revenge (to an extent) or fighting to see who's the better man. I'll watch UFC for that. Batista and Taker are about to have thier 80th match. What the hell is behind thier feud? Orton and HBK are about to have a match. why should I care. Oh, Orton put HBK on the shelf and HBK wants revenge. I haven't seen that storyline before.
What I'm getting at is they could do so much more, but they don't. They keep it simple and bland. Probably the last decent storylines they did was Batista/HHH, Jericho/Christian/Trish, Matt/Edge. But even these are not that memorable.
There's my ramble for the quarter
Let me explain.
True wrestling and wrestling feuds to me involve a good guy and bad guy. They talk bad about each other, get into fights and have a match. Pretty simple booking for wrestling. And you see a lot of this right now. It's all very bland and not much behind storylines.
When I've enjoyed watching wrestling the most to where I couldn't stop talking about it and couldn't wait for next weeks show right afyer Raw ended was times like
The Canada/USA war
Higher Power
nWo
DX takeover of WCW
Kane/Taker in the beginning
Bret/Owen
Jake/Macho
Dusty/Horsemen.
Austin/Pillman
Sting/Flair (early 90's)
Austin/Corporation (Rock, Vince)
These storylines weren't just about a guy winning a match and then getting a Title shot. They weren't just about a guy hating another guy just because they are sceduled to have a match. They weren't about said wrestler attacking the champ from behind one night and now there's a feud. There was more behind them. A lot more. Wrestling wasn't the focal point. Titles weren't the focal point. The wrestlers were fighting for a lot more then just to win a match or a title.
I'm just not seeing these kinds of stories anymore. And that's why I don't enjoy it as much. The whole Jericho comeback got me thinking about this. Sure, he'll come in and get a nice pop, he'll challenge somebody and soon get a Title shot. ok..and? I've seen that a thousand times before.
I need more then just guys fighting for respect, fighting to get revenge (to an extent) or fighting to see who's the better man. I'll watch UFC for that. Batista and Taker are about to have thier 80th match. What the hell is behind thier feud? Orton and HBK are about to have a match. why should I care. Oh, Orton put HBK on the shelf and HBK wants revenge. I haven't seen that storyline before.
What I'm getting at is they could do so much more, but they don't. They keep it simple and bland. Probably the last decent storylines they did was Batista/HHH, Jericho/Christian/Trish, Matt/Edge. But even these are not that memorable.
There's my ramble for the quarter