PDA

View Full Version : Paul Heyman Interview. Very good read


Dave Youell
02-05-2008, 09:15 AM
Paul Heyman: Why I left WWE

By SIMON ROTHSTEIN of THE LILSBOYS

Published: 04 Feb 2008


HES the man who revolutionised the wrestling business.
The outspoken leader of a hardcore cult that will never die.
The creative genius forever synonymous with the letters E-C-W.
But for more than a year no one has heard a peep out of Paul Heyman.
Where was he? Why did he walk out of the WWE in December 2006? And most importantly what does he really think of Vince McMahons new ECW?

Now, for the first time Paul answers those questions and more as only Paul can.He also reveals the first details and advert for his exciting new project, the Heyman Hustle, which starts right here on The Sun Online on Monday February 18.

Enjoy!

Paul, lets cut right to the chase. What happened with you and Vince McMahon?

I think what it boils down to is Vince McMahon and I have totally separate and distinct visions for what a wrestling or sports entertainment product should be.Theres nothing wrong with having those different visions, the problem was that Vince started to take the difference of opinion personally.

And once that personality conflict comes into play, when youre trying to steer the direction of a product, it becomes a bad work environment.

So Vince didnt like working with me anymore and I didnt like working with Vince anymore.

And its his company, so obviously he has to stay!


What do you think went wrong and why?

The brand should never have been brought back after the very first One Night Stand in 2005.

The follow-up show in 2006 made money, but only because it served as the platform for Rob Van Dam to beat John Cena.

Then Sci-Fi Channel was willing to give a test run for the brand ECW and they currently pay a lot of money for that TV show.

So the theory of bringing ECW back and making it profitable worked as a business move.

But the expectation from the audience that ECW was being brought back only served to be a monumental letdown.

By comparison, if someone were to resurrect The Beatles and say: “You know what, we want to make them more globally accepted, so were going to have a white guy, an Asian female, a Hispanic Bisexual and an African-American with a Scottish accent.”

In the land of WWE that actually makes sense.

But no matter how you look at it, its just not the Beatles.

So in the same light, its just not ECW.

Extreme doesnt mean blood, or tables, or barbed wire. ECW was always about progression, moving forward, giving more bang for the buck.

For example, a finish in most every match. Simple thought. A winner and a loser. And a story with it that makes sense.

But if you voiced that opinion, Vince would take it personally.

If you look at the attempts to recreate the nWo, to re-create Goldberg and, even now, trying to recreate Ric Flairs career on the line, Vinces magic only happens when he creates it from the get-go.

If Vince doesnt create it from the get-go, he cant embrace the formula.

But why didnt Vince just say: “Paul, I know youre good at ECW, its on Sci-Fi, do your stuff, work your magic, make me some money?”

Because that goes against everything that is Vince McMahon.

Vince is such a control freak that if he sneezes, the next 10 minutes of any meeting are ruined because he is so p***ed at himself for not being able to control the sneeze.

And its worked very well for him in life.

He is a billionaire. He has his own luxury private plane and, by the way, its a really nice plane. He has things and property and cash that every other wrestling promoter in the world doesnt have.

He has achieved these goals HIS WAY and so Vince is not about to let anyone have free reign over anything in his kingdom. Thats just not going to happen.

How was it for you to see ECW - your baby, the thing you created - almost destroyed in front of your eyes?

It was a very rough road because, make no mistake about it, Vince McMahon has every right to do anything that he wants with ECW.

He bought the right to exploit the intellectual property of the brand. Its his, he owns it, and nobody can question whether or not he is entitled to do whatever he damn well pleases with it.

Rob Van Dam has articulated on this brilliantly in some recent interviews and it kind of brought back the memories of that time in 2006.

I tried to resign, and in front of other people because I wanted witnesses, several times in last two months of my tenure in WWE/ECW.

I offered my resignation to Stephanie on several occasions. I told her the tensions between me and Vince were getting in the way of the brand, that Vince was taking everything personally, and that it was neither fun, creative, or productive any more.

I thought if I left, Vince would give the brand the TLC - um, thats Tender Loving Care, not Tables Ladders and Chairs - it needed. Stephanie kept trying to get involved, but Vince was on a tear.

I dare suggest that Vince was craving for someone to compete with him on any level, in anything in life, and also at the same time, hating to lose, said: “I have the original owner of ECW, I have the original creative mind of ECW, and you know what, were gonna battle over the creative direction of this product.”

And, at the same time, its like the WrestleMania main event - because its a predetermined finish.

At the end of the day, Vince has to determine what the direction is.

Im not there to compete with him. Im there to help him. Im on his side, Im his tag team partner.

It just became misery to work there which is why, as Van Dam has pointed out, I just wanted out so badly I finally couldnt take it any more.

When did that happen, what was the actual date, because no one has known where youve been for a long time?

The final straw was the December to Dismember Pay Per View. That show was just a wreck.

I knew it going in. I kept trying to pitch different things for the show that week, that weekend, and even the day of the show. All day long on the day of the show, I kept coming to Vince saying: “The people are going to throw this back in our face.”

Can you give us some examples of the things that you wanted to do that Vince said “no” to?

I thought the undercard was horrible.

I thought that the design of the show itself made no sense.

I just felt that the entire layout of the show, the entire complexion of the event was a downer.

I also thought that we were doing Bobby Lashley no favours the way he was going to win the title. Lashley winning the title, especially if you eliminate Rob Van Dam and CM Punk early, would be leapfrogging over RVD and Punk.

Van Dam was the sentimental favourite, Punk was the kid that all the crowd was getting behind and they wanted to see the upset.

If you dont appease the need for the audience to see that new hero get crowned like Punk did the week before at Survivor Series when DX let him say Are you ready? then the audience will feel ripped off.

If you dont put that spotlight on Van Dam, with whom the paying customers have just taken this long ride back into the title chase, then the paying customer will feel ripped off.

My opinion was to start the chamber off with the Big Show saying: “Im a seven foot tall, 500lb giant, Im gonna mow through every one of you.”

And the first to take him on would be Punk. Playing to the fact that UFC is so hot and in the public consciousness, Punk chokes out Big Show in the first round of the Elimination Chamber, four-and-a-half minutes in, and now the champion is out.

You know for a fact, before any two contenders lock up, Im getting a new champion at the end of this match.

Then, the first guy to come out after Big Show v Punk, would be Van Dam. You let Van Dam and Punk fight it out, and then you start feeding in the heels.

Vince hated this. He especially hated the fact that Big Show liked it.

Even though he was being choked out within five minutes, Big Show liked it?

Of course, because he was making a new guy!

Big Show is so underappreciated in terms of how smart he is to the business, and how willing he is to make new stars.

Vince wanted all babyfaces out of the way and for all the spotlight on Lashley and for Lashley to do a Goldberg-style two minute squash of The Big Show.

At that point, not only did I realise that this is going to suck, not only is everyone going to throw this back at us, but this show is going to run short.

And during the show, I pointed all this out to Vince, which just angered him even more, and he didnt care.

His attitude was: “When this broadcast is over, people will see a new champion, theyll have a new hero and theyll all be happy.”

When I went to Vince right before I went out to introduce the Chamber, I pointed out again to him “Vince this show is horribly short.”

I had this idea of getting 15 minutes out of the crowd, but Vince said: “No, no, no. Just go out there, make your point, and introduce the Chamber.”

Which is why, when I was in the ring, I made the statement: “ECW will live long after I am gone.”

Because I knew, either when I went back into the dressing room, or within the next day or two, it was time for me to leave.

Was there a part of you that thought about breaking character and actually quitting in the ring live on PPV?

No, because that would be unprofessional.

All that is doing is, in an emotional state, thinking that I am f***ing Vince McMahon over, and its a very dramatic thought but I have to say this on the record - I dont think Vince McMahon f***ed me over.

I dont think Vince, in his mind, did anything malicious towards me. I think Vince did what he either persuaded or convinced himself was the best for business.

The biggest shoot that I could do in that ring was not to say “I quit”. The biggest shoot that I could do was to make the statement “this brand goes on without me”.

Thats what I said, and thats what ended up happening.

Do you think that Vince was trying to prove that Extreme didnt work, as he didnt invent it. That he was trying to destroy the legacy of ECW?

Like most people who make grand achievements in life Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Richard Branson, Bill Clinton Vince McMahon is a most complex individual.

It would take Freud himself to accurate describe, and probably 900 pages to do so, how Vinces mind works.

Theres a lot of self-justification that goes on.

Vince could never accept that another brand could be successful.

Look at the success of The Rise and Fall of ECW, the DVD, which has sold close to 400,000 copies worldwide and at any point is the No1 or No2 bestselling DVD in sports entertainment history. The World Class DVD is just breaking out of 10,000 units sold right now. The Rey Mysterio DVD, the John Cena My Life DVD, sold approximately 30,000 units each.

You look at the staggeringly successful numbers that ECW DVD did, Vinces answer to you will be: Well, of course it sold that many, weve educated the audience that ECW is something special by the fact that every time a table broke, every time a high spot happened, every time an extreme style was showcased, weve encouraged the audience to chant E-C-W and weve allowed it on our broadcast.”

Now if you think about that logic, its so ass-backwards, that youre going to think this man is a f***ing idiot or hes insane, but hes neither.

He has convinced, or persuaded, himself the statement is true.

And he wholeheartedly believes that the success of the first ECW PPV was because the $400,000+ gate that was in the Hammerstein Ballroom were the last vestiges of the ECW audience and all those people that bought it on PPV were WWE fans who were educated that ECW would be something special.

Vince McMahon would swear on his grandchildren that is an accurate statement.

He wont be lying, hell mean it when he says it, unfortunately its the furthest thing from the truth.

So after December to Dismember, you literally left that night and never came back?

No, we clashed that night after the show, and the next day too. By then, that was fait accompli.

We were clashing on the plane going to North Charleston, South Carolina. It was ridiculous.

So by the time we got to North Charleston, I had already called home and said: “Just so you know, Im coming home tonight.” Id already made up my mind.

After the producers meeting, Vince, Stephanie and I sat in that room trying to determine what the future held and I just wanted to go home.

We sat there for a while, theres a lot of history with me and Vince, and there was a lot I wanted to say to him, to his face, and there was a lot that he wanted to say to my face.

I think we both had merits in our argument.

At the end of the day, I shook his hand and went home and Ive never looked back.

Have you spoken to Vince or Stephanie since?

Oh, Stephanie called me the next day several times, and tried to repair it. I dont think there was anything to repair.

I had a run in the wrestling industry that in my wildest dreams as a kid I could never have imagined.

As a performer I accomplished everything I could possibly have wanted. As I writer/booker, I had a run that all but the most uber-successful people in the history of this business could have ever fantasised about.

I owned a company that is the only company in history to be resurrected. Ted Turner lost hundreds of millions of dollars on WCW, no-ones calling for the resurrection of that promotion.

My tiny little creative vision called ECW not only was resurrected but still stands today without me.

What more is there left for me to do?

Stephanie made me an offer in 2007 to come back and run developmental, because of the success we had in OVW.

She said; “Vince wants you to create new stars again, do what you were doing in OVW and also get Deep South Wrestling on track.”

They offered me that position, with the same pay, same stock options, same benefits.

It was a wonderful offer and anybody that has the opinion they wanted to drive Paul Heyman out of the business should understand that this offer was given to me and it was most flattering.

Of course, Im sure that part of the deal would be “no contact with Vince” but Stephanie really wanted me to take the job, and was pushing me to take the job.

Stephanie was shocked that I wouldnt jump all over this opportunity because on a money basis, it was an insanely lucrative deal.

A miniscule amount of the work I had to put in before, on a job that I truly enjoy which is developing characters, working with the next generation so every star of the next generation will have been moulded at least partially by me.

It was a very financially lucrative and creatively fulfilling job but by this point I just didnt want it any more.

Dave Youell
02-05-2008, 09:17 AM
Our MMA correspondent at The Sun, Mark Gilbert, said you were trying to buy Strike Force at one point, is that true?

You kind of caught me off guard in asking the question, but it’s 100% true.

I don’t know whose names I’m supposed or not supposed to discuss, so I will skirt the issue of who else was involved by simply saying we formed a group of qualified, intelligent, motivated people last summer and had some meetings with Scott Coker about buying Strike Force and obviously keeping Coker intricately involved.

I think Strike Force was in a position to, if not challenge UFC, then be what ECW was in the 90s which is a very viable alternative brand.

I have a lot of admiration for what Scott Coker and his team have built in Northern California, and I like the name Strike Force. Good name for branding.

I like their presentation, I think they have some marketable fighters under contract, and we had a collective vision that I think could have really, really worked.

The negotiations stopped because one of the key people in our group ended up being someone we didn’t want to get stuck with, because we realised in the negotiations that he was the wrong guy for the deal.

Scott Coker is a good man. I like him personally, love his organization, and think he deserves a lot of credit for what he’s built.

Finally let’s talk about the Heyman Hustle. Let’s give people a taste of what’s going to happen on The Sun’s website in two weeks time.

Well, my partner Mitchell Stuart always laughs at me because I define the Hustle as the High Definition Video Blog of a Rambling Mind.

Our goal is to break ground in the wireless/broadband and digital/mobile platforms, which get so much attention from the entertainment industry right now because its unchartered turf and no-one has been able to figure out what the future holds on this constantly evolving concept.

We want to peel back the layers of celebrity and we’re going to demonstrate that larger-than-life personalities are not only found on television and the movies.

We’re going to find the extraordinary in the ordinary and find the ordinary in the extraordinary.

So, we’re just diving in as deep as we can go and trying to be the leaders of the exploration of this new universe.

So, we’re content providers in a brand new, exploding, and already rapidly changing field.

Damn, that sounds exhilarating!

Dave Youell
02-05-2008, 09:18 AM
Sorry about the poor paste job, but there’s some interesting stuff in there, his comment about the Beatles is spot on

And it sounds like Steph wasn’t as much as a road block as I was lead to believe

Can’t believe he’s trying to get Tito Santana and Rick Martel out of retirement though, that seems a little weird

.44 Magdalene
02-05-2008, 09:26 AM
Damn good read.

.44 Magdalene
02-05-2008, 09:26 AM
Also, extra Badass Points for Big Show.

Londoner
02-05-2008, 09:33 AM
I love the bit where he talks about what vince is really like, and i dont think he's lying at all. Good stuff. that's why I love paul heyman.

Also ive always appreciated the big show, and that just earns my respect more.

The Optimist
02-05-2008, 09:53 AM
Matt, do you really have to reply to everything twice?

The Optimist
02-05-2008, 09:53 AM
Kennedy.

Dave Youell
02-05-2008, 09:54 AM
How else do you get your post count up?

Dave Youell
02-05-2008, 09:54 AM
Really how?

.44 Magdalene
02-05-2008, 09:57 AM
Fuck yeah I do.

.44 Magdalene
02-05-2008, 09:59 AM
http://static.rbytes.net/full_screenshots/f/u/funny-baby-animals-screensaver.jpg

Londoner
02-05-2008, 10:00 AM
Im gonna post twice also. Cause im bored.

Kane Knight
02-05-2008, 10:18 AM
Poor paste job really does hurt it.

Kane Knight
02-05-2008, 10:18 AM
Double post for the heck of it.

Dave Youell
02-05-2008, 10:21 AM
Poor paste job really does hurt it.

Yeah sorry, it's probably online at Thesun.co.uk

But I got that off some dude from ukff.com

So those crappy symbols are nothing to do with me, I just copied what that guy did.

Infact, how the heck does that shit even happen?

Innovator
02-05-2008, 10:27 AM
That Chamber would have been awesome, even if Lashley went on to still win.

Londoner
02-05-2008, 10:46 AM
Yeah i like heymans idea of the chamber match.

Heros Welcome
02-05-2008, 11:26 AM
GREAT READ!

Agreed the Idea for the Chamber would have been 10x better had Heyman had his way.

Jura
02-05-2008, 11:50 AM
Yeah I like Heyman's idea. The little time that RVD faced Punk in the chamber was very good. Imagine if they were to go at it one on one for a while.

Kane Knight
02-05-2008, 12:12 PM
I'll look for it at the Sun, then. Thanks for the heads up. :D

DarKCentaur
02-05-2008, 12:33 PM
I find it really interesting about Stephanie too. If Heyman is to be believed (which I no doubt DO believe him), it seems like Stephanie is really trying to fix a lot of the glaring holes in the company. Maybe not so much with RAW, but she's definitely trying to help ECW. Perhaps when Vince retires down the line, we may see Stephanie lead the WWE charge back up the hill... or maybe she'll just fuck it up even worse, who knows. I have a little faith now though.

DarKCentaur
02-05-2008, 12:35 PM
Also, that hindsight sure is a bitch eh? Not only did December to Dismember suck ass, but Lashley is now gone from the company. GG Vince.

BigDaddyCool
02-05-2008, 01:46 PM
When you say Vince retires, you mean dies right? He isn't ever going to retire.

But yeah, what is the point of having creative and talented people on staff if you are just going to ignore them?

Kalyx triaD
02-05-2008, 02:16 PM
Heyman's EC would've been the bomb. I appreciate Vince for making a product I've enjoyed for years, but the more I hear about his current business logic the more disappointed I get.

PorkSoda
02-05-2008, 02:21 PM
That was a good read. Thanks for posting.

And Vince won't ever retire, or die. When he does die, he'll probably have a statue of himself on the Raw set.

PorkSoda
02-05-2008, 02:23 PM
Double post.

Rob
02-05-2008, 03:12 PM
Yeah i like heymans idea of the chamber match.

Anything would have been better than what they did.

mike627
02-05-2008, 04:43 PM
I just read this, on the sun's site.Heyman's idea for the EC wolud have been great but,Vince being the control freak that he is did not allow it.:( some posters at another forum I hang around in think Steph just made those offers for Paul E to book OVW again so no other promotion wolud get him.

Pardeep 619
02-05-2008, 07:20 PM
Cant believe hes trying to get Tito Santana and Rick Martel out of retirement though, that seems a little weird

I don't think Heyman was referring to the tag team Strike Force

Rob
02-05-2008, 07:49 PM
He was being sarcastic pal. Just no good at it ;)

Anybody Thrilla
02-05-2008, 07:50 PM
:lol:

Please tell me you were kidding about Strike Force, Youell.

Anybody Thrilla
02-05-2008, 07:50 PM
Really could have used a " :shifty: " there.

Dave Youell
02-06-2008, 08:02 AM
No, I was deadly serious.

Even though references were made within that article about Strike Force being a MMA group, bringing back that 80's tag team was the way to go :shifty:


--

There was that any better?

The Optimist
02-06-2008, 10:04 AM
I find it really interesting about Stephanie too. If Heyman is to be believed (which I no doubt DO believe him), it seems like Stephanie is really trying to fix a lot of the glaring holes in the company. Maybe not so much with RAW, but she's definitely trying to help ECW. Perhaps when Vince retires down the line, we may see Stephanie lead the WWE charge back up the hill... or maybe she'll just fuck it up even worse, who knows. I have a little faith now though.

Let's not jump to HUGE conclusions. Just because I throw a used paper cup into the recycle bin instead of the trash, it doesn't mean I'm on a wholesale campaign to save the world. She probably realized at one or two points that Heyman really is a good person to lead the booking, and has ideas that will appeal to ECW's fanbase more than her father. Though, I'm suprised that she did that much, or was that savvy.

DarKCentaur
02-06-2008, 12:21 PM
Let's not jump to HUGE conclusions. Just because I throw a used paper cup into the recycle bin instead of the trash, it doesn't mean I'm on a wholesale campaign to save the world. She probably realized at one or two points that Heyman really is a good person to lead the booking, and has ideas that will appeal to ECW's fanbase more than her father. Though, I'm suprised that she did that much, or was that savvy.

Let me have my dreams dammit :(

The Optimist
02-06-2008, 12:52 PM
She's less incompetent than I previously thought. That was my dream, and it's come true.

Aim low, avoid disappointments.

BigDaddyCool
02-06-2008, 01:16 PM
She's less incompetent than I previously thought. That was my dream, and it's come true.

Aim low, avoid disappointments.

Actaully don't aim at all, that way you can be pleasently surpised when something does work out.

BigDaddyCool
02-06-2008, 01:18 PM
But anyhow, it is my theory that between drugs, roids, and Vince power trip he has started to live his gimmick. And the occasionally times when the McMahon family comes out to address Vince, I don't really think they are acting, so much as saying what Vince really needs to do.

Mr. Nerfect
02-07-2008, 09:44 AM
Big Show going first in the Elimination Chamber was the right move. He was leaving the company, and being the first eliminated would have made everyone left in the match seem "better" than Big Show, in kayfabe terms. Not only would Show have been making CM Punk a star by tapping out to him, but Show would have also been lending some much needed credibility to the heels left on ECW: Hardcore Holly and Test.

I'm not sure if I'd have booked the Elimination Chamber exactly the same way as Heyman, he really didn't go into detail at the end, but in my opinion, the final three in the match would have been Rob Van Dam, CM Punk and Bobby Lashley. CM Punk was newish at the time, and already has the rub from earlier, so he can go first, and that leaves the final fall to take place between Lashley and RVD. Personally, I'd have gone with Lashley turning heel, aligning with Heyman, and then continuing the chase story heading into WrestleMania, or something.

.44 Magdalene
02-07-2008, 11:03 AM
Heel Lashley = ..... :|

The Optimist
02-07-2008, 11:30 AM
It's the best of a bad situation. Heel Lashley can be used for good where Face Lashley was used for evil.

.44 Magdalene
02-07-2008, 12:03 PM
But faces can be used for comical value.



We're not supposed to be laughing directly at the huge black heel.

The Optimist
02-07-2008, 12:12 PM
We do alot of things were not supposed to do.

I wish Donald Trump was involved again, he could sell me Bobby Lashley.

gatoconbotas
02-07-2008, 05:14 PM
Great Read. Heyman is for sure, the man. A lot of respect points to both Stephanie and Big Show after reading this.

It's nice to know at least there's hope for Steph in the future.

gatoconbotas
02-07-2008, 05:15 PM
....Future.

Dave Youell
02-08-2008, 08:22 AM
Heel Lashley. Easy.

Give him a manager and he plays it like an ice man with no emotion, you know, basically be himself, would be easy

.44 Magdalene
02-08-2008, 08:46 AM
You'd have to put a mask on him. Even his ice man face looks more like an icecream man.

.44 Magdalene
02-08-2008, 08:47 AM
I mean, Brock had a baby boy face, but he could at least look like a pissed off baby boy. Lashley's most serious expressions still come off as... I don't know, confused.

Mr. Nerfect
02-09-2008, 02:40 PM
Heel Lashley = ..... :|

No, I think you are misjudging Lashley here. The man was a damn crisp looking heel down in OVW. He's deceptively good at playing the machine without emotions.

I remember reading about some exchange of ideas between Vince McMahon and Paul Heyman discussing a possible heel turn for one of ECW's top faces around the time of the Elimination Chamber; with Vince McMahon suggesting that Rob Van Dam turn heel, but Heyman sticking with his guns and saying that Lashley would make the better heel.

If you had Paul Heyman do what he did for Big Show with Bobby Lashley, I think you'd get Lashley over as a heel no troubles.

ShawnRhodeIsland
02-09-2008, 03:14 PM
It's nice to see Heyman's moved on. I wish him well in all his future ventures :shifty:

On a serious note, it's amazing how diplomatic he comes across in the interview. Sure, he's disappointed, understandably, but he also admits McMahon has every right to do whatever he wants with ECW. Unfortunately, what he's doing with it, is SHIT.

Also, I always thought Stephanie hated Heyman's guts and everything he lays his hands on but obviously not. I totally respect him for who he is and what he's done and he was absolutely right with wanting Punk to go over Big Show. Instead, the match turns to crap and Lashley wins, the company turns to shit and where is Lashley now??? The sad thing is Vince will likely never learn from his mistakes.

ShawnRhodeIsland
02-09-2008, 03:21 PM
Another point I'd like to raise is that Vince comes off as more of a control freak than anyone has reported now more than ever. A control freak with a penchant for revisionist history that only fits in with HIS ideas and creations. Damn anything different from him that might've worked. Damn anything that might've been remotely outside of the McBox of "we make movies" thinking. It's unfortunate.

.44 Magdalene
02-09-2008, 03:25 PM
Another point I'd like to raise is that Vince comes off as ... A control freak with a penchant for revisionist history that only fits in with HIS ideas and creations.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2048/2252689724_c99cafd997_m.jpg

.44 Magdalene
02-09-2008, 03:25 PM
Shock and awe, ladies and gentlemen

Mr. Nerfect
02-09-2008, 05:55 PM
Shock and awe, ladies and gentlemen

Unfortunately, Vince has lasted longer than eight years.