View Full Version : Inverted Atomic Drop
Exyle
02-12-2008, 10:43 PM
How is this move not considered a low blow and subject to disqualification rules? Looks like a knee to the nuts from where I'm sitting.
Because no one books it as such.
Wooo.
El Fangel
02-13-2008, 12:03 AM
The opponent fell unto his knee.
Yeah another one of those WTF's?
The ONLY feasible explanation I can come up with is that the force of the "drop" is on the base of the opponent's spine (not actually his nuts).
My Final Heaven
02-13-2008, 09:43 PM
Because Heels don't use the move. :shifty:
.44 Magdalene
02-14-2008, 09:28 AM
Because Heels don't use the move.
Seriously, though.
Fabien Barthez
04-07-2008, 07:40 PM
The move is dropping your opponent's coxix on your bent knee. The shock sent up the spine beingthe 'atomic' part.
Except the way the Inverted Atomic Drop is normally performed they are clearly crotched, not positioned to affect only the back.
NoJabbaNoBogRoll
04-07-2008, 10:58 PM
The move that hasn't been called the Manhattan Drop on TV since 9/11.
Destor
04-07-2008, 11:39 PM
The move is dropping your opponent's coxix on your bent knee. The shock sent up the spine beingthe 'atomic' part.
This is corret.
TerranRich
04-08-2008, 12:31 AM
The move that hasn't been called the Manhattan Drop on TV since 9/11.
Oh. That may also explain whatever happened to Big Boss Man and Akeem...
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.