PDA

View Full Version : 10 worst franchises in pro sports


owenbrown
05-08-2008, 01:01 PM
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8098378/Top-10:-Worst-franchises-in-pro-sports?MSNHPHCP&GT1=39002

10. Los Angeles Clippers
9. Vancouver/Memphis Grizzlies
8. Atlanta Hawks
7. Minnesota Twins
6. Boston Bruins (:wtf:)
5. Detroit Lions
4. Tampa Bay Rays
3. Arizona Cardinals
2. Kansas City Royals
1. Pittsburgh Pirates

The Bruins one kinda surprised me. I thought they were better than that.

Kris P Lettus
05-08-2008, 01:35 PM
WOOOOOOOO

No Saints!!

BigDaddyCool
05-08-2008, 01:36 PM
Wait, is it better to be at the top of the bottom of the list?

BigDaddyCool
05-08-2008, 01:36 PM
Plus I expected the Royals to be on there.

Kris P Lettus
05-08-2008, 01:37 PM
Wait, is it better to be at the top of the bottom of the list?

I would guess the bottom cause #11 didn't even make the list..

SammyG
05-08-2008, 01:39 PM
Wow. Bdc makes 2 posts, first one is a completely idiotic question, and the second one has a spelling error. Sums up his posting on TPWW, I guess.

BigDaddyCool
05-08-2008, 01:40 PM
Techincally it wasn't a spelling error.

BigDaddyCool
05-08-2008, 01:41 PM
Also, SammyG's one post in the thread adds nothing to the conversation and is attacking a poster. Sums up Sammy's posting on TPWW.

Stickman
05-08-2008, 01:47 PM
Lotta baseball teams there.

Kris P Lettus
05-08-2008, 01:49 PM
Only one NFL team..

IN YOUR FACE SHISEN AND RDD

Supreme Olajuwon
05-08-2008, 02:02 PM
2 NFL teams Krispy

Also we both know the Saints and Bengals should be on there over the Twins.

Kris P Lettus
05-08-2008, 02:16 PM
The Cardinals aren't an actual football team..

:shifty:

Stickman
05-08-2008, 03:06 PM
The Chicago Blackhawks are definatly worse than the Bruins but they both have been crappy franchises for years and years....sad really.

BigDaddyCool
05-08-2008, 03:23 PM
I'm almost a little insulted that the Royal's didn't make #1. But then again, the Royals are technically a farm team playing in the major league.

LoDownM
05-08-2008, 03:27 PM
The Chicago Blackhawks are definatly worse than the Bruins but they both have been crappy franchises for years and years....sad really.

St. Louis Blues have been worse than the Blackhawks over the years.

Supreme Olajuwon
05-08-2008, 03:34 PM
yeah but the Blues at least consistently made the playoffs and had Hull as the face of their organization

Stickman
05-08-2008, 04:08 PM
St. Louis Blues have been worse than the Blackhawks over the years.

Until their owner passed away this year, they have not televised a home game in like 30 years. The AHL team in Chicago was outdrawing the famed Blackhawks for awhile.

The Mackem
05-09-2008, 10:59 AM
Poor pirates

Super V
05-09-2008, 06:10 PM
How are the Knicks not on that list??? :wtf:

Bad Company
05-10-2008, 08:23 AM
Western Force

owenbrown
05-10-2008, 12:23 PM
How are the Knicks not on that list??? :wtf:

I dunno, but they should be. Guess Fox Sports doesn't consider them to be a pro team. :shifty:

YOUR Hero
05-11-2008, 12:01 AM
Don't mix success with poorly run & managed

spilzrvd_69
05-11-2008, 03:29 PM
dumb list

Gertner
05-11-2008, 06:33 PM
The Chicago Blackhawks are definatly worse than the Bruins but they both have been crappy franchises for years and years....sad really.


stole my thunder there. The Blackhawks are definitley worse.

BCWWF
05-11-2008, 07:58 PM
Don't mix success with poorly run & managed

I don't understand how this list includes the Twins. Sure, they have a shitty owner with lots of money who won't spend it because the Twins don't come close to turning a profit, but they have been a model small-market organization for the past eight years.

owenbrown
05-12-2008, 01:07 PM
I don't understand how this list includes the Twins. Sure, they have a shitty owner with lots of money who won't spend it because the Twins don't come close to turning a profit, but they have been a model small-market organization for the past eight years.

Fox Sports probably took into account besides the fact they have 3 Workd Series titles(1 as the Washington Senators in 1924, and 2 as the Twins in 1987 and 1991) they were on the brink of contraction 6 years ago.

Splaya
05-12-2008, 01:51 PM
Only one NFL team..

IN YOUR FACE SHISEN AND RDD

:shifty:

YOUR Hero
05-13-2008, 09:55 AM
The Twins are a well run team in terms of scouts and managers but it's the ownership of said team that puts them on that list.

MVP
05-13-2008, 11:32 PM
The Bruins don't belong on that list at all, and I think the Montreal Expos should be an honorable mention. Few winning seasons for a team that produced a lot of talent, and very few of those players will be remembered in an Expos uniform.

Other honorable mentions I'd add are the Chicago Blackhawks, St. Louis Blues, and New Jersey Nets.

Gertner
05-14-2008, 12:24 AM
lol how about adding my leafs to the list. Christ are they horribly run.

James Steele
05-15-2008, 12:36 AM
How are the Texas Rangers not on that list?