View Full Version : Villan for Batman 3?
Savio
12-28-2008, 05:24 PM
I searched for other threads like this but search is not working
I was going through his villians on wikipedia and while the Riddler is being hyped as the next villian I wouldn't mind seeing firefly as one or atleast a minor one for the next movie. The Riddler in the view of the public eye is just like a green joker, I'd like to see a lesser known villian grab the spot light before he does.
Kalyx triaD
12-28-2008, 05:28 PM
"Green Joker"?!? Where did you get that from?
Savio
12-28-2008, 05:42 PM
ummm IGN I think
.44 Magdalene
12-28-2008, 05:46 PM
Yeah, word from a few sources (I think Michael Caine among others) is that they want Johnny Depp to play the Riddler. Now, how much stock you should put in that is anybody's guess, since from the looks of it they're taking a breather before they even start thinking about Batman 3.
.44 Magdalene
12-28-2008, 05:47 PM
Personally, I'd love to see some Bane.
Kalyx triaD
12-28-2008, 05:50 PM
Poison Ivy, sans green skin and monster plants. Keep the toxin gimmick, sexuality.
El Fangel
12-28-2008, 06:00 PM
Would LOVE to see more the scarecrow
Savio
12-28-2008, 06:06 PM
lol Scarecrow should be in every Batman Movie.
They could also play Wrath (A cop killer) as a minor villian to make the cops hate Batman even more.
Disturbed316
12-28-2008, 06:14 PM
I read that Eddie Murphy is going to be the Riddler due to Johnny Depp filming another Pirates.....wtf
Dave Youell
12-28-2008, 06:21 PM
I don't see Bane or Poison Ivy in the the next one, they don't seem to match the universe created, as no one seems to have actual powers.
I heard originally that the dude that was going to expose Bruce as Batman is the last one could be playing riddler
My personal choice by a country mile would be David Tennant:
http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/david-tennant-doctor-who.jpg
As for other villians, they did make out that Joker was meant to be back, I don't think he should be re-cast, but having Harley Quinn in there could be all kinds of awesome, who to play her though is a different kettle of fish, I'm thinking someone like Britney Murphy.
Other potentials are the usual suspects like Hoffman for Penguin (Phillip-Seymour not Dustin)
There's always a danger that they might try to bring in Robin (dear god no!)
Catwomen?
Dave Youell
12-28-2008, 06:24 PM
I read that Eddie Murphy is going to be the Riddler due to Johnny Depp filming another Pirates.....wtf
The only idea worse than that was Hitler's parents deciding to have children.
Eddie Murphy should stick to making un-funny movie where he plays himself in 18 different roles.
Seriously, if any producer is actually suggesting that, they should get several incurable diseases
.44 Magdalene
12-28-2008, 06:32 PM
There were rumors for a while of an Eddie Murphy Riddler, but it's been massively debunked.
Thank God.
Bane never needed powers, and even in-canon his toxin was overkill. He's taken Batman without the venom serum, and certainly doesn't need it for movie purposes. Really, a heavy steroid mix shouldn't count as powers in the first place.
For the record, the guy that nearly exposed Bruce as Batman is named Mike Engal.
Mr. Engal.
Mr. E.
Say it out loud for me.
Dave Youell
12-28-2008, 06:38 PM
They could have Bane with roids, ok, I'll give you that.
Would be great if they did that Bane unlocks the Asylum storyline, that would be a great way to introduce a few guys at once.
Lock Jaw
12-28-2008, 07:10 PM
They already unlocked the asylum in the first movie.
Blitz
12-28-2008, 07:33 PM
I'd kill to see Bane done correctly, but I doubt it'll happen.
Pretty sure Nolan said he had no interest in portraying the Penguin, so you gotta figure that puts the Riddler next in line. Mr. Freeze would be interesting, but he's probably a bit too far out for the more realistic universe. Same with Poison Ivy. Can't really think of any top tier villains who could carry a film on their own other than those ones.
In terms of lesser known villains, I'd dig seeing David Cain (or Lady Shiva), King Snake, or Deadshot.
Dave Youell
12-28-2008, 07:41 PM
Catwomen could easily carry a 3rd film. With Rachael dead, it sets it up perfectly
.44 Magdalene
12-28-2008, 07:43 PM
I don't know if they'd want to risk Catwoman at this point. I mean, the Halle Berry flick wasn't that long ago...
Blitz
12-28-2008, 07:44 PM
Yeah forgot about Catwoman. But I'm not sure if she's a film carrying antagonist like Joker or Ras. Catwoman works better when she's off in the shadows, half against Batman, half with him.
Kalyx triaD
12-28-2008, 07:52 PM
I don't think Halle Berry's Catwoman will scare them off, especially in this reboot-happy Hollywood era.
And frankly, I'm a bit tired of being portrayed as so stupid I couldn't tell one version of a superhero from another. Ironically, comic fans been used to alternate versions of classic heroes for decades now. I don't think casual fans will destroy their brains seeing a new Catwoman either.
.44 Magdalene
12-28-2008, 11:43 PM
I think Catwoman was bad enough to ruin anything involving the character for the next five years or so, to be honest.
I mean, there's bad renditions, and then there's Catwoman.
Sting Fan
12-28-2008, 11:49 PM
I dont understand the need to overlook The Penguin.
I could see the penguin as some kind of Ganster who is trying to put back together the underworld while Batman is being hunted by the police. Make him a mafia type club owner who everyone calls the penguin due to his stature and shape.
Hell it can be a derogotory term for him, a media nick name even, there is no actual need for him to be part human part penguin.
I wouldn't rule out a part man/part penguin person in this world we live in, much less in a movie that is loosely based on this world.
I don't see why Penguin would be so hard to portray. There are people out there that have some freaky mutations, so I don't see why having a guy who is disfigured to the point that he looks like a penguin is too absurd for this franchise. In fact the psychological implications of such a mutation as it relates to his sociopathic behavior would make for a fine third Batman movie.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 01:46 AM
The comicbook Penguin had no physical deformities at all. He didn't have webbed fingers or any of that shit, he never lived in the sewers, etc. It was only like that in Batman Returns. He was only called the Penguin because of his long nose, and because he waddled when he was a kid.
I can understand how he would be better avoided, though. He's not actually supposed to be sociopathic; he is, within canon, completely aware of himself and fully competent. He's hard to portray in that context because he's... just sort of a weird character. Batman Returns had to almost totally transform him across the board to make him work at all, and I can understand why they'd rather pick a character they can use as-is instead of totally reinventing.
So far, the villains used have been pretty well in their element; actual, comicbook depictions of the Joker and the Scarecrow akin to their movie counterparts have been around forever. Part of what I loved about Dark Knight Joker was all the comic shoutouts and in-jokes. With the Penguin, though... they'd have to change him pretty heavily to make him interesting, which would alienate some fans. It'd be easier to just pick someone that doesn't need as much changing.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 01:55 AM
Batman 3 needs to look like this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7f/Batman287.JPG
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 02:10 AM
I'd love to see some lesser known villains. My first choice would have to be Raiz Alghoul (sp?). For those who don't remember him, he is the dude that has the Lazarus pits or w/e and is basically Immortal.
Another good one would be to have 2-face back and have Clayface as the second villain. That would be excellent.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:12 AM
I'd love to see some lesser known villains. My first choice would have to be Raiz Alghoul (sp?). For those who don't remember him, he is the dude that has the Lazarus pits or w/e and is basically Immortal.
Do you even know what the fuck we're talking about?
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 02:14 AM
Do you?
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 02:14 AM
Wow. Seph you are a fucking idiot.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 02:29 AM
You act as if I don't realize he was the antagonist in Batman Begins. What you fail to realize is that in canon, he has the ability to transfer his conciousness into other beings. This makes him prime choice for a rehash. Considering the talk of using the Joker again, I feel he is better in that he avoids the type of shit bringing back the Joker would bring the film after Ledgers death. I only refer to him as lesser known because people not familiar with Batman have no clue who he is.
Obviously you think he died at the end of BB. Maybe you should read more of the actual comics, jackass.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 02:30 AM
I like how people take the villains of batman like mr freeze or bain and say that theyre too unrealistic for the universe... What did you think when you heard that the scare crow and raz were going to be the villains in the first movie? Thay could make them work, it would take a lot of imagination but it could work.
If scare crow can have a serum that can make people hallucinate their worst fears, then im sure a serum can be created to turn bain into a supersoldier.
Bain isnt a complex enough character to stand alone in the nolan batmans tho. A johnny depp riddler would be cool, and a brittney murphy harley quinn would be perfect match of character to actress. A catwoman might work to if they take her from the angle that shes a cat bugerler and not actually dressing up like a cat.
Kalyx triaD
12-29-2008, 02:32 AM
You act as if I don't realize he was the antagonist in Batman Begins. What you fail to realize is that in canon, he has the ability to transfer his conciousness into other beings. This makes him prime choice for a rehash. Considering the talk of using the Joker again, I feel he is better in that he avoids the type of shit bringing back the Joker would bring the film after Ledgers death. I only refer to him as lesser known because people not familiar with Batman have no clue who he is.
Obviously you think he died at the end of BB. Maybe you should read more of the actual comics, jackass.
We all know about Ras' gimmick, and so does Chris Nolan.
It's not happening so long as he's at the helm, buddy.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:34 AM
You act as if I don't realize he was the antagonist in Batman Begins. What you fail to realize is that in canon, he has the ability to transfer his conciousness into other beings. This makes him prime choice for a rehash. Considering the talk of using the Joker again, I feel he is better in that he avoids the type of shit bringing back the Joker would bring the film after Ledgers death. I only refer to him as lesser known because people not familiar with Batman have no clue who he is.
Obviously you think he died at the end of BB. Maybe you should read more of the actual comics, jackass.
There's a pretty big difference between "They should bring Ra's back" and "Hey, they should try somebody obscure, like that Ra's fellow. Anybody know who Ra's is?" Don't bitch at other people when you make yourself sound like an idiot. Plus, they referenced his reported immortality several times in Batman Begins, and he did in fact "come back from the dead." Don't pretend your original post didn't sound stupid, because it did.
I like how people take the villains of batman like mr freeze or bain and say that theyre too unrealistic for the universe... What did you think when you heard that the scare crow and raz were going to be the villains in the first movie? Thay could make them work, it would take a lot of imagination but it could work.
If scare crow can have a serum that can make people hallucinate their worst fears, then im sure a serum can be created to turn bain into a supersoldier.
Bain isnt a complex enough character to stand alone in the nolan batmans tho. A johnny depp riddler would be cool, and a brittney murphy harley quinn would be perfect match of character to actress. A catwoman might work to if they take her from the angle that shes a cat bugerler and not actually dressing up like a cat.
You don't actually know that much about Bane, do you?
Kalyx triaD
12-29-2008, 02:36 AM
Bane broke the Bat, mind and spirit.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:37 AM
He also out-thought and out-planned the Bat, and could have done what he did without any chemical aid.
But I have to keep myself from fanboying out.
The Franchise
12-29-2008, 02:39 AM
I'd really like to see The Riddler. I don't think he'd been a "green Joker." I doubt whoever plays him (Eddie Murphy lol come on) will be as good as Heath but there's lots of potential. I'd love to see The Riddler leading Batman into traps, almost making it seem like he's on Batman's side since he is now against the cops and making the cops think he's against Batman but he's really on no ones side, just trying to cause chaos.
Fuck, that almost sounds like The Joker-lite. :|
Robin heel turn? I really don't know. I like some of the ideas in this thread though. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
The Franchise
12-29-2008, 02:41 AM
I don't know much about Batman so I probably shouldn't even be in this thread. But I always found The Riddler to be cool and never really thought of him as similar to The Joker other than their names being related to comedy.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:42 AM
Yeah, that's where the green Joker issue comes in. The Joker, despite being an improviser, improvised well enough that it seemed beautifully orchestrated from the beginning. Running the Riddle as doing exactly the same results with different motions in the background... well, you can see where the problem comes up. They'd have to really use their noodles to think of ways to differentiate this character's antics from the Joker's, especially since the Joker's plot ended up being so masterful.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 02:42 AM
I wasnt referring to bain in the comics being a supersoldier I was giving a possible spin for the movie. Oh god please tell me your getting all worked up because you think Im messing up the origin of a character you like!!!!
Kalyx triaD
12-29-2008, 02:45 AM
Hush would be cool, with some revisions to his character. And what's up with Leslie Thompskins?
Reavant
12-29-2008, 02:46 AM
Instead of having the riddler focus on all around chaos like the joker, his motivation should be similar in the way it executed but be more focused on one person. Either another character in the story or batman/bruce wayne himself.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:47 AM
I wasnt referring to bain in the comics being a supersoldier I was giving a possible spin for the movie. Oh god please tell me your getting all worked up because you think Im messing up the origin of a character you like!!!!
Yes, I'm so totally worked up. Look how angry this emoticon looks. :mad: Man, that's some ferocious internet rage right there. Mighty angry.
I sorta wish you'd have given me a real response instead of pulling that "Oh, look at the nerd" nonsense again, but I guess this makes it easier on me, eh?
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:48 AM
Instead of having the riddler focus on all around chaos like the joker, his motivation should be similar in the way it executed but be more focused on one person. Either another character in the story or batman/bruce wayne himself.
You realize that the Joker's entire plot was to get to Batman, right...?
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:49 AM
Hush would be cool, with some revisions to his character. And what's up with Leslie Thompskins?
Hush keeps crossing my mind, but appearance-wise... well, with the Watchman so close, and he sorta looks like Rorschach... :shifty:
I'm sure it will be done and Ledger's death has nothing to do with this but seriously this
http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh55/Architrash/joker.jpg
is a hard act to follow.
Savio
12-29-2008, 02:51 AM
I'd love to see some lesser known villains. My first choice would have to be Raiz Alghoul (sp?). For those who don't remember him, he is the dude that has the Lazarus pits or w/e and is basically Immortal.
Another good one would be to have 2-face back and have Clayface as the second villain. That would be excellent.
doesn't clayface change into shapes? that seems to unrealistic for this series
Kalyx triaD
12-29-2008, 02:52 AM
A character like Edward Nigma is right up Nolan's alley. I'm sure he can create some mind-fucks with the character's gimmick. The whole theme of the movie could be a guessing game sort of thing. Joker's antics were more on the line of shocking traumatic twists and turns, whereas Riddler does want you to solve the case in a way (like Jigsaw). In this way clues could be left all over the movie in a way we'd need to watch it again to fully see Riddler's game at work. Selina Kyle could be thrown in as a wild card as well, working within the Rachael's dead plot and the whole with Bruce/against Bruce thread.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:52 AM
I think that's why Johnny Depp's name keeps getting tossed around, really. If anybody can conceivably keep up, it might have to be Depp--a man that's pretended to be Ledger for at least one event.
Kalyx triaD
12-29-2008, 02:53 AM
Hush keeps crossing my mind, but appearance-wise... well, with the Watchman so close, and he sorta looks like Rorschach... :shifty:
Yeah...
But it looks like Watchmen won't be out for another 100 years so...
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 02:54 AM
You act as if I don't realize he was the antagonist in Batman Begins. What you fail to realize is that in canon, he has the ability to transfer his conciousness into other beings. This makes him prime choice for a rehash. Considering the talk of using the Joker again, I feel he is better in that he avoids the type of shit bringing back the Joker would bring the film after Ledgers death. I only refer to him as lesser known because people not familiar with Batman have no clue who he is.
Obviously you think he died at the end of BB. Maybe you should read more of the actual comics, jackass.
I know he didnt die at the end of the movie you fuckwit, Its not my fault you made yourself to look severely retarded by looking like you didnt know he was in the first movie.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 02:54 AM
What does it matter what I know about him, that wasnt even the point of what I was saying before. Do you disagree with the fact that he could relatively easyly be put into the nolan universe version of batman?
Vastardikai
12-29-2008, 02:55 AM
I still say Terrible Trio as an opening act, setting up something with... Killer Croc
:shifty:
They could set something up as "Similar to the Joker," but noting that something just... seems off. Maybe use the fact that it seems too choreographed? The Joker pulls things out of his ass and it happens to work. The Riddler plans everything to precise detail, even going so far as to taunt the police with Riddles...
And I just summed up the Riddler's MO...
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 02:55 AM
Yeah, I realized afterwards it sounded retarded in a thread where most ppl are familiar with Batman. Didn't really think much of it as I had this discussion with everyone at work and most of them are like "Who the hell is Ra's Alghoul?? We waan more Joker!!11!" Guess I just assumed everyone else was oblivious as well.
Anyways, Bane 'could' work, but they would have to take care to make him more 'serious' than his previous film incarnation. He was dumbed down far too much and made too lackeyish. Use him properly, and he could be gold.
As for Catwoman, I'd leave her unused for awhile. Same with Poison Ivy.
If they do go with Riddler, I'd like to see him played by the guy who played the Goblin in Spiderman. Can't remember his name all of a sudden. Depp would be great, but he is overdone IMO. Pair Riddler with Mad Hatter and have 2 'insane' villains messing with Batmans mind. A movie based off of the psychological implications this causes Bruce would be amazing.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 02:56 AM
You realize that the Joker's entire plot was to get to Batman, right...?
You realize that changed by the end of the movie right?
Im thinking the riddler start big and end small or rather go from chaos to focusing in on one person where the joker went small and then branched out to the city.
Kalyx triaD
12-29-2008, 02:57 AM
Joker plan A: Corrupt Batman
Joker plan B: Corrupt Dent
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 02:58 AM
What does it matter what I know about him, that wasnt even the point of what I was saying before. Do you disagree with the fact that he could relatively easyly be put into the nolan universe version of batman?
He doesn't need to be chemically enhanced. It's not necessary to the character at all. Making him some sort of chemical supersoldier is just slapping on more unrealistic silliness for no particular reason, unless you desperately want a rehash of Batman & Robin.
Batman & Robin = Why you need to know about the characters you're trying to write for. Before you tell me about how you're not personally writing the movie and it doesn't matter, well... don't post if you're going to say something stupid.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 02:59 AM
Joker plan A: Corrupt Batman
Joker plan B: Corrupt Dent
Plan C turn the city against itself
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:00 AM
If they do go with Riddler, I'd like to see him played by the guy who played the Goblin in Spiderman. Can't remember his name all of a sudden. Depp would be great, but he is overdone IMO. Pair Riddler with Mad Hatter and have 2 'insane' villains messing with Batmans mind. A movie based off of the psychological implications this causes Bruce would be amazing.
Which Goblin?
William Defoe http://www.imdb.com/media/rm444962560/nm0000353or James Franco http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3601964288/nm0290556
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:03 AM
http://images.askmen.com/galleries/men/james-franco/pictures/james-franco-picture-4.jpg
or
http://campussqueeze.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/william_defoe188.jpg
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:03 AM
He doesn't need to be chemically enhanced. It's not necessary to the character at all. Making him some sort of chemical supersoldier is just slapping on more unrealistic silliness for no particular reason, unless you desperately want a rehash of Batman & Robin.
Batman & Robin = Why you need to know about the characters you're trying to write for. Before you tell me about how you're not personally writing the movie and it doesn't matter, well... don't post if you're going to say something stupid.
again missing the point. I never said he had to be. I gave a suggestion as to how he could fit, especially if you wanted to take the chemical route. People were questioning the ability to put him in the movie and I gave a possibility that would seemingly fit with the format of the last two.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:04 AM
william defoe would be interesting
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:04 AM
Yes, turning him into Captain America definitely fits the format of the last two
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:05 AM
Oh now your just being silly
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:06 AM
You stop it silly man!
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:06 AM
doesn't clayface change into shapes? that seems to unrealistic for this series
Clayface can indeed shapeshift. However, in keeping the serious tone, they could simply have his 'strectch' ability. I guess kinda akin to Sandman in the Spidey flicks. Just don't have him fully devolve into the clay blob form, really, and just base it off his gradual decline into the monster. The character definately has the mindset for this series. Just make him secondary villain so he isn't the main focus and it would work.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:09 AM
Which Goblin?
William Defoe http://www.imdb.com/media/rm444962560/nm0000353or James Franco http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3601964288/nm0290556
William Defoe.
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:10 AM
In my honest opinion, the only person I would deem acceptable to pick up the Jokers mantle would be Johnny Deep. He has shown time and again that the roles he plays are seperate from himself.
I mean you dont see him and go "Thats Johhny Deep"
you see him and go "Thats E.g Jack Sparrow, Edward Scissorhands, etc"
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:11 AM
I wonder how Jim Carrey would look as the Joker...
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:12 AM
Oh now your just being silly
Ra's was a thinker within a plausible organization and an often agreeable viewpoint, foreign to help you stretch that disbelief. The Scarecrow was a psychologist with a drug that mirrors effects of real life hallucinogens. The Joker was a man with realistic psychological issues and a perspective that mimics real, accepted ideals.
You're suggesting that the next villain should be a chemically pumped up military project instead of, say, a self made man with high but nonetheless human potential strength that simply outthinks, then overpowers Batman out of morbid curiousity and the desire for challenge, leading out of something seemingly bigger to wear Batman down--setting up for other portions of the movie.
Y'know, like he was in the comics. But why do that, when we could pump him full of phlebotinum and make his strength super human? Yeah, that's realism at its finest.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:13 AM
I can't see him, or anyone, topping Ledgers performance though. Ledger was simply astounding. It would be an insult to recast Joker now. Maybe down the line somewhere. Just not any time soon.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:15 AM
I especially love that pumping him full of chemicals is "making him fit" into the universe, despite offering no insight whatsoever into motive or agenda. It's just making Bane less human for the sake of making it campy, then claiming it's to wedge him in appropriately.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:16 AM
Now that I think about it, cast Defoe as Riddler and Depp as the Hatter. Book it. Depp is better suited to the more insane/fragile of the two.
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:16 AM
I can't see him, or anyone, topping Ledgers performance though. Ledger was simply astounding. It would be an insult to recast Joker now. Maybe down the line somewhere. Just not any time soon.
I never said he would top it. I dont think anyone ever will.
Also I think it would be bad taste to have him in the next movie, they could play it off by mentioning casually that he is safely locked up in Arkham.
And like I said. Depp is the only one I think that could pull off the role well enough without an insult to Ledger that would make people happy.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:16 AM
I can't see him, or anyone, topping Ledgers performance though. Ledger was simply astounding. It would be an insult to recast Joker now. Maybe down the line somewhere. Just not any time soon.
We might have to see how The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus goes--after all, Depp apparently portrays Ledger portraying another character in the movie. Could be a pretty big mind fuck.
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:17 AM
We might have to see how The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus goes--after all, Depp apparently portrays Ledger portraying another character in the movie. Could be a pretty big mind fuck.
SO is what you just posted.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:17 AM
I wish I could rep 44 again right now. Too lazy to spread it around.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:19 AM
SO is what you just posted.
No shitting, though. Colin Ferrell, Johnny Depp and I think one other guy pick up the parts that Ledger left behind when he passed away--so they literally pretend they're Ledger playing those parts.
And Tom Waits is in it. Movie's going to blow my fucking face off.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:20 AM
We might have to see how The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus goes--after all, Depp apparently portrays Ledger portraying another character in the movie. Could be a pretty big mind fuck.
Mind = blown.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:21 AM
Heres a question. Who would you cast as Bane?
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:22 AM
So Depp played Ledger. Wow. If he did good it might change peoples minds about Joker being recast.
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:24 AM
Heres a question. Who would you cast as Bane?
http://tanglebones.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/body042.jpg
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:26 AM
ROFL. I love you right now FA. That made my night. I was thinking maybe Vin Diesel, but that takes the cake.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:27 AM
LOL. Yeah, I don't know though. I think it might take some camera work to make the guy look bigger than he really is--sorta like they did with Xerces in 300? I don't know. I can't think of too many guys that are both incredible actors and convincingly intimidating.
Except... well, Debo. And he's already been in a Batman movie.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:27 AM
And I've actually thought about Vin Diesel as Mr. Freeze.
Jokingly, of course.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:30 AM
Ra's was a thinker within a plausible organization and an often agreeable viewpoint, foreign to help you stretch that disbelief. The Scarecrow was a psychologist with a drug that mirrors effects of real life hallucinogens. The Joker was a man with realistic psychological issues and a perspective that mimics real, accepted ideals.
You're suggesting that the next villain should be a chemically pumped up military project instead of, say, a self made man with high but nonetheless human potential strength that simply outthinks, then overpowers Batman out of morbid curiousity and the desire for challenge, leading out of something seemingly bigger to wear Batman down--setting up for other portions of the movie.
Y'know, like he was in the comics. But why do that, when we could pump him full of phlebotinum and make his strength super human? Yeah, that's realism at its finest.
haha... k your getting all hung up on the suggestion I made and just missing the point all together that wasnt even directed to you in the first place, but because of the other thread your all mad and trying to proove a point, but heres the deal, all those characters you just listed off arent necessarily that way in the comics especially in different books and renditions of each comic. For example the joker appear, acts and has a different orgin based on what brach of comic you read from batman or DC, but he and his story had to be made to work in the nolan universe.
but you said that scare crow had a drug that mimiced real life hallucinogens and thats true but say you wanted to go the serum route with bain. could you not have a serum that mimics the collective affects of testosterone, steroids and adrenaline??? which if mixed properly IN REAL LIFE can cause a person to physically perform way past their normal abilities.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:30 AM
I was also wondering if you think they'll ever try a crossover movie like they did with comics. I cant see Nolan being for it, but someone will eventually try to cash in on this.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:31 AM
They've done talks for a Justice League movie, and both Nolan and the Bruce Wayne guy have said they want no part of it. Nolan feels it would take away from the atmosphere he's established for the movies, and I fully agree.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:34 AM
I especially love that pumping him full of chemicals is "making him fit" into the universe, despite offering no insight whatsoever into motive or agenda. It's just making Bane less human for the sake of making it campy, then claiming it's to wedge him in appropriately.
a man that was stopped or defeated by batman and wanted to find a way to get back at him. or used by another villain as a henchamn of sorts to get to/kill batman.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:34 AM
Yeah! Lets juice Bane and have him played by 'The Man Whose Arms Exploded'. We can even put some Alka Seltzer in his mouth so it starts foaming.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:35 AM
haha... k your getting all hung up on the suggestion I made and just missing the point all together that wasnt even directed to you in the first place, but because of the other thread your all mad and trying to proove a point, but heres the deal, all those characters you just listed off arent necessarily that way in the comics especially in different books and renditions of each comic. For example the joker appear, acts and has a different orgin based on what brach of comic you read from batman or DC, but he and his story had to be made to work in the nolan universe.
but you said that scare crow had a drug that mimiced real life hallucinogens and thats true but say you wanted to go the serum route with bain. could you not have a serum that mimics the collective affects of testosterone, steroids and adrenaline??? which if mixed properly IN REAL LIFE can cause a person to physically perform way past their normal abilities.
That's funny, because you keep referencing the other thread and I don't. What point am I trying to prove again...?
Why would you bother stretching disbelief any more than you need to? They took exactly as much as they needed to for Joker, Ra's, etc. Bane doesn't need the serum to work. It's not integral, and only makes the story come out less believable than before. Why even bother with it if adds nothing at all to the plot? Dragging in excessive comic book traits for no real plot value isn't good movie logic, in fact it's...
a bit nerdy.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:36 AM
Theres no way they could fit the other DC heros in with the universe that this batman is in without either seriously compromising the properties of either the other heros or the integrity of the nolan universe.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:37 AM
a man that was stopped or defeated by batman and wanted to find a way to get back at him. or used by another villain as a henchamn of sorts to get to/kill batman.
See, the fact that you're saying he could be a henchmen pumped up on chemicals...
That's Batman & Robin, and it's terrible.
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 03:40 AM
Terrible doesn't begin to describe it.
In my honest opinion, the only person I would deem acceptable to pick up the Jokers mantle would be Johnny Deep. He has shown time and again that the roles he plays are seperate from himself.
I mean you dont see him and go "Thats Johhny Deep"
you see him and go "Thats E.g Jack Sparrow, Edward Scissorhands, etc"
Angel has a point, I mean next to Ledger, Depp is the only person who would take the role seriously, when I say seriously I mean SERIOUSLY.
Ledger lived, breathed and ate Joker while filming, most times he would even take it off screen.
Depp would do a good Joker I'm sure of it if we come to that point.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:42 AM
I sorta wish you'd have given me a real response instead of pulling that "Oh, look at the nerd" nonsense again, but I guess this makes it easier on me, eh?
That's funny, because you keep referencing the other thread and I don't. What point am I trying to prove again...?riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Why would you bother stretching disbelief any more than you need to? They took exactly as much as they needed to for Joker, Ra's, etc. Bane doesn't need the serum to work. It's not integral, and only makes the story come out less believable than before. Why even bother with it if adds nothing at all to the plot? Dragging in excessive comic book traits for no real plot value isn't good movie logic, in fact it's...
a bit nerdy.
are you going to basically repeat what I said in my last post because I know what I wrote in my last post... i wrote it.
all those characters you just listed off arent necessarily that way in the comics especially in different books and renditions of each comic. For example the joker appear, acts and has a different orgin based on what brach of comic you read from batman or DC, but he and his story had to be made to work in the nolan universe.
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 03:42 AM
Yeah! Lets juice Bane and have him played by 'The Man Whose Arms Exploded'. We can even put some Alka Seltzer in his mouth so it starts foaming.
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8443/hahaoe4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=hahaoe4.jpg
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:43 AM
Angel has a point, I mean next to Ledger, Depp is the only person who would take the role seriously, when I say seriously I mean SERIOUSLY.
Ledger lived, breathed and ate Joker while filming, most times he would even take it off screen.
Depp would do a good Joker I'm sure of it if we come to that point.
I'm just hoping they won't waste Depp on trying to ressurect Ledger. Depp has his own talents that could be spent on new villains, new stories, and new endeavors. And really, nothing would help alleviate the bleak end of Dark Knight like never seeing the Joker again--that his incarceration really was his finale, and even if you can't change the world, you can certainly take a few bad people off the street. It sucks that we can't see Ledger's Joker again, but I think I can live without seeing Depp's Ledger's Joker.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:45 AM
Where have i written anywhere that he needs to be juiced up?
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:49 AM
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Except that was in response to... oh, wait your subtley referencing the other thread. D: Or did I just misinterpret you randomly being a troll? And way to go, completely avoiding an actual response again in lieu of trying to sink your claws into some juicy metaposter bullshit. Learn to debate the point and not the person making it, your arguments will sound alot less like ignorant flaming.
are you going to basically repeat what I said in my last post because I know what I wrote in my last post... i wrote it.
Are you going to basically ignore my point in favor of being catty? The juice is exactly what I was talking about, and apparently what you were talking about, but you're in favor of keeping it. This isn't even reading between the lines--you're contradicting yourself and then acting like a girl about it.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:50 AM
Where have i written anywhere that he needs to be juiced up?
Your entire method for "fitting him in" was justifying the juice, not counting some half assed agenda you shoehorned in upon request. What the fuck else did your suggestion consist of? Don't start backtracking on me now, you've violated enough debating rules today.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:51 AM
I like your strategy of arguement though. You find one thing to hang your hat on and focus on it(bain being juiced), then you try to get me to argue myself into a circle bay taking what I say (the characters dont have to in directly reflect their previous incarnations from comics, cartoons, etc.) and reworking it too look like the idea is coming from you.
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 03:54 AM
I like your strategy of arguement though. You find one thing to hang your hat on and focus on it(bain being juiced), then you try to get me to argue myself into a circle bay taking what I say (the characters dont have to in directly reflect their previous incarnations from comics, cartoons, etc.) and reworking it too look like the idea is coming from you.
Your only real suggestion on Bane was that he be juiced. You later duplicated the plot of Batman & Robin and/or every action movie ever made when I criticized that particular notion. Your only idea this entire time has either been absolute shit to cover up the juice argument, or the juice. Okay.
And if you're not arguing in favor of the juice, what are you arguing about? What the fuck is your point at all, or has this degraded into just trying not to look wrong? My only complaint is that the juice is unnecessary, but here you are, still arguing instead of conceding. You've agreed that the juice is unnecessary--so what's the deal? Or are you just determined to "win," getting all "worked up" and whatnot?
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:56 AM
Your entire method for "fitting him in" was justifying the juice, not counting some half assed agenda you shoehorned in upon request. What the fuck else did your suggestion consist of? Don't start backtracking on me now, you've violated enough debating rules today.
backtracking to things i actually said verse things your saying i said. its simple go back and look. I was giving broad point to people who were having a tough time finding a way to have batman villains fit into the movies. Im sorry you dont like the idea of bain being juiced. I dont care whether he is or not in fact I dont like bain very much anyway, but if you want to keep harping on it be my guest.
Reavant
12-29-2008, 03:59 AM
Your only real suggestion on Bane was that he be juiced. You later duplicated the plot of Batman & Robin and/or every action movie ever made when I criticized that particular notion. Your only idea this entire time has either been absolute shit to cover up the juice argument, or the juice. Okay.
And if you're not arguing in favor of the juice, what are you arguing about? What the fuck is your point at all, or has this degraded into just trying not to look wrong? My only complaint is that the juice is unnecessary, but here you are, still arguing instead of conceding. You've agreed that the juice is unnecessary--so what's the deal? Or are you just determined to "win," getting all "worked up" and whatnot?
:D My point was that it would be easy to get even the most obscure and fantastic batman villains into the story of the third batman movie as long as the writers had imagination. then I gave examples and you got all pissy and I had a lot of fun!
.44 Magdalene
12-29-2008, 04:01 AM
:D My point was that it would be easy to get even the most obscure and fantastic batman villains into the story of the third batman movie as long as the writers had imagination. then I gave examples and you got all pissy and I had a lot of fun!
He's not obscure or fantastic. Boy, this post sure had alot of substance and boy howdy, was it relevant! Way to sidestep that one, champ.
And I "got pissy" in the sense that I pointed out how your idea was dumb. You really have no idea if I'm pissed or not, it just weighs your side of things to pretend that I am.
I'm just hoping they won't waste Depp on trying to ressurect Ledger. Depp has his own talents that could be spent on new villains, new stories, and new endeavors. And really, nothing would help alleviate the bleak end of Dark Knight like never seeing the Joker again--that his incarceration really was his finale, and even if you can't change the world, you can certainly take a few bad people off the street. It sucks that we can't see Ledger's Joker again, but I think I can live without seeing Depp's Ledger's Joker.
The Joker is never truely "incarcerated" because he is always found not guilty due to his "insanity"
if it comes to it down the line and they decide to bring back Joker in the film Depp is the one for the role, anyone else would tarnish the legend that is The Joker.
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 05:08 AM
I'm just hoping they won't waste Depp on trying to ressurect Ledger. Depp has his own talents that could be spent on new villains, new stories, and new endeavors. And really, nothing would help alleviate the bleak end of Dark Knight like never seeing the Joker again--that his incarceration really was his finale, and even if you can't change the world, you can certainly take a few bad people off the street. It sucks that we can't see Ledger's Joker again, but I think I can live without seeing Depp's Ledger's Joker.
WHY SO SERIOUS?
http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/6641/whysoseriousnr7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Kalyx triaD
12-29-2008, 05:32 AM
Just watched TDK again and I think the dialogue in the interrogation scene as well as Joker's 'upside-down dialogue' pretty much sums up Batman 3's possible themes. The way Batman and Gordon's dialogue at the end of BB explained TDK's plot. Really interesting seeing it again.
Triple Naitch
12-29-2008, 08:44 AM
No Robin. Ever. No Catwoman for now.
The Riddler could be played by Jake Gyllenhal or some random British guy.
The Penguin should be played by Jack Black. He already has the voice nailed and can play a serious part like he did in King Kong.
They should also throw in Bane. Debo would be perfect. Maybe they can continue to follow his story after the boat incident. Then The Riddler or Penguin buy him out of jail in order to take out the Batman.
Adder
12-29-2008, 12:00 PM
I believe Depp is too big a star for this series.
Rammsteinmad
12-29-2008, 01:12 PM
To be honest I don't really wanna see anyone who has already been in the other Batman movies. The Joker HAD to be done, but Catwoman, Riddler etc have all had their movie appearances. In trying to keep it realistic, maybe someone like Hush or Deadshot would be good.
Personally I'd love to see Liam Neeson back as Ras Al Ghoul. And someone said on the first page that Scarecrow should have an appearance in every film. That'd actually be pretty cool in a lol way.
On the other hand who wants to see a Batman film where Ghoul and Scarecrow are both the villains AGAIN?
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 01:17 PM
On the other hand who wants to see a Batman film where Ghoul and Scarecrow are both the villains AGAIN?
*Raises Hand*
The Franchise
12-29-2008, 01:28 PM
I believe Depp is too big a star for this series.
What? Christian Bale and Morgan Freeman are huge stars. The Dark Knight grossed one billion dollars. There isn't anyone on this planet who's 'too big a star' for the Batman series.
The Franchise
12-29-2008, 01:34 PM
No shitting, though. Colin Ferrell, Johnny Depp and I think one other guy pick up the parts that Ledger left behind when he passed away--so they literally pretend they're Ledger playing those parts.
And Tom Waits is in it. Movie's going to blow my fucking face off.
Look's like a good flick. ALSO
Actors Depp, Farrell, and Law opted to redirect their wages for the role to Ledger's young daughter, Matilda, who had been left out of an old version of Ledger's will.
:heart:
El Fangel
12-29-2008, 01:42 PM
Wow, that was so fucking cool of Depp, Farrell and Law
Sepholio
12-29-2008, 10:56 PM
Hugh Laurie should play the Riddler upon further examination.
Blue Demon
12-29-2008, 11:03 PM
Which Goblin?
William Defoe http://www.imdb.com/media/rm444962560/nm0000353or James Franco http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3601964288/nm0290556
It's actually WILLEM Dafoe. Get it right :roll:
YOUR Hero
12-30-2008, 12:08 AM
They should create a whole new villian. Made for the next movie. That'll teach you all!
The Franchise
12-30-2008, 12:18 AM
OK so I had an idea for a villain targeting Bruce Wayne in my head that sounded good but now I'm not sure if it would be cool or just pointless and gay.
My idea was for a secondary villain, maybe Reese Coleman(lol) who is after Bruce Wayne, not Batman. This guy who doesn't know that Bruce is Batman, attempts to get Batman's help to take out Bruce, since he assumes Batman is "bad" now that the cops are after him. I dunno, this wouldn't be the main conflict in the movie obviously, but it could make things interesting if Batman now has to face the main villain like The Riddler and then another guy who is after his Bruce Wayne persona. This means Batman/Bruce is never safe.
Guess I'll add my Two Cents...
Depp as The Riddler
I would like to see Depp as The Riddler based solely on the fact that he is a damn fine actor and I like to watch damn fine actors at work. Perhaps he could be somebody drafted in by the police to help them find Batman, during the investigation "Ed Nigma" (I wouldn't use that name) discovers that Batman is in fact Bruce Wayne but rather than telling the police he keeps this information to himself and he becomes The Riddler and begins to torment Wayne/Batman (insert personal reason as to why he would do that into the plot).
The Joker Returns
With the rise of The Riddler in effect and his targeting of Wayne/Batman starting to effect the city at large the police turn to someone they believe can understand The Riddler's mind. Through Harley Quinn (Britany Murphy is a good fit for the role and could also provide the 'love interest' for Bruce) we have a 'Silence of the Lambs' setup between her and The Joker, played by....
Johnny Depp (hear me out).
I'd have him filmed from behind/shoot from his perspective so that you would never see his face (Depp would do his best to nail Ledger's take on the voice). I think there'd be an excellent duality in having both characters played by the same guy - as long as it was someone like Depp.
**An alternative is to use the 'Silence of the Lambs' scenario to twist "Ed Nigma" from police helper to the character he would become. "Ed Nigma" would use The Joker to try and 'get inside the mind of Batman' as Joker seems to understand what drives and motivates Batman. During these meetings Joker can subtley turn "Ed" into The Riddler.**
Penguin
An idea for Penguin would be to have him reform the Mob before becoming Mayor of Gotham. The people of Gotham are willing to vote anybody into power that they feel can stop the vigilante known as Batman. This comes as a knee jerk reaction tothe events of The Dark Knight (i.e. Batman "killing" Dent).
This however is a little too close to Batman Returns for my liking so an alternative would be to mix the two scenarios above and have The Riddler become Mayor - seeking Batman as the powerful Mayor "Nigma" as well as tormenting Bruce Wayne as The Riddler. Just for kicks of course.
Other Villains
I'm not too keen on Catwoman, Bane or a returning Ras BUT I can see how they could be done. Clayface should be steered completely away from - unless he's just a guy suffering from a disfigurative facial disease (akin to the Elephant Man) that somehow has some power in the Mob or something. I dunno, not really interested tbh.
This is where I lose you all...
Robin
At first I thought the idea of "The Boy Wonder" appearing in the Nolan created Batman Universe was a big no-no but now I've come to like the idea. However, there would need to be some major changes...
- I would at no point use the name Robin (unless it just so happened to be the characters middle name that could be referenced as a little injoke towards the end of the film).
- I'd also drop the circus background that we've seen before. Far too campy.
- He wouldn't be Batman's sidekick and wouldn't get a costume.
Batman would use "Robin" as a go between so that he could still communicate with Commissioner Gordon without risking Gordan's position. I'd have the character be some kinda streetwise teenager who at some point sees Batman save someone from a mugger (or something similar) thus learning that Batman is not the bad guy he's being made out to be.
Now comes the single reason I'd have "Robin" in the film: his method of getting around the city...parkour (freerunning). I think a chase secene with him running across rooftops, flipping, rolling, diving from ledge to ledge, etc would be kinda cool. Even have the chase be against Batman.
Anyways, there's my take on a few things. Feel free to rip it apart. Or better yet try to tie together the loose strands that I've left.
Savio
12-30-2008, 02:51 AM
I can't think of too many guys that are both incredible actors and convincingly intimidating.
Except... well, Debo. And he's already been in a Batman movie.http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/6452/pbonline2067ece40e3qb.jpg
This guy is pretty intimidating he wasn't bad on prison break either.
.44 Magdalene
12-30-2008, 03:07 AM
Well, I think we've established that Bane would have to be black
thedamndest
12-30-2008, 03:14 AM
I think Bane should be a black guy.
Rammsteinmad
12-30-2008, 10:05 AM
XL's got a pretty good idea for Robin there. A Street-wise free-running teenager who is Batman's "middle man" type guy so he can communicate with Jim Gordan. Good idea right there. :y:
El Fangel
12-30-2008, 11:40 AM
I have to agree. That Robin idea would be decent.
My 0.03
Robin - NO. Darkwing. YES. Have Dick Grayson play the Darkwing character, he could be inserted as a second vigilante in the city, however he is deemed the "Good One" to Batmans "Bad Guy" In the movie we could have The Riddler tormenting Batman, and like XL said the thing about Nigma visiting Nigma in prison.
I would change that, eventually Nigma helps The Joker escape played by Depp of course, who I think could pull off the voice, has the acting and undoubtingly could pull of the look.
This leads to the city being in a rather bad predicament seeing as the one person that could help they have cast out, Darkwing is contacted to find and bring down The Riddler, unknowingly to him or anyone for that matter at the moment, The Joker has escaped and is working with The Riddler. Darkwing succeeds in finding The Riddler who is at the top of an office tower. He is blindsided by The Joker with a crowbar, Joker has a Knife to his neck and back turned, all of a sudden the windows shatter and Batman grabs The Riddler and drops him off the building (You see him being dropped, you dont however see that there is a rope around his ankle until later) This leads to a confrontation with the Joker, he is playing his manipulative card then all of a sudden, he pulls a mask out and puts it on. Batman asks in his voice "whats the mask for"
The Joker replies in a raspy voice "Nightmares..." enter huge serum bomb and Scarecrow
There you have a fight people.
Blitz
12-30-2008, 02:55 PM
You mean Nightwing.
Kalyx triaD
12-30-2008, 02:55 PM
My Robin riffs are well documented.
Kapoutman
12-30-2008, 03:03 PM
I'm probably the only one, but I think that Edward Norton would be a good Riddler.
El Fangel
12-30-2008, 03:03 PM
You mean Nightwing.
Haha, yeah. I knew Darkwing didnt sound right.
Kalyx triaD
12-30-2008, 03:04 PM
I'm probably the only one, but I think that Edward Norton would be a good Riddler.
That would be interesting.
thedamndest
12-30-2008, 03:20 PM
When there's trouble you call DW. LET'S GET DANGEROUS.
DaveWadding
12-30-2008, 03:30 PM
http://www.geocities.com/athens/delphi/2376/darkwingduck.jpg
Kalyx triaD
12-30-2008, 03:39 PM
I had a crush on Gozling for some reason.
FourFifty
12-30-2008, 08:11 PM
I'd like to see Robin in the next Batman movie.... and then kill him off in the one after that.
Heyman
12-30-2008, 08:19 PM
Some retarded and possibly humorous ideas
-Jason Alexander a.k.a. "George Kastanza" = Penguin
-Brock Lesnar = Bane
-Johnny Depp = Riddler
-Angelina Jolie or Jessica
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.